Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheGeezer
The wealthy in the United States are far more liberal than the people as a whole. When they complain about the Bush tax cuts, they manage to define rich to mean family incomes as low as $50,000. Even at $200,000 a year a family is not rich. Indeed, a presidential salary of $400,000 barely qualified Clinton.
12 posted on 01/31/2004 12:19:19 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
Yep...and to think of all those millions of dollars going to the Party elite, that could be better used to help the poor and homeless that compassionate liberals remind us of so often:) The very people who wanted to get money out of politics are now the ones working to keep it in. I can only take so much of this hypocrisy.
20 posted on 01/31/2004 1:45:59 PM PST by cwb (Dean = Dr. Jeckyll exposing his Hyde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS
Yes, but if you break down the rich by how the money was acquired, generally, self-made businessmen tend towards being conservative whereas those who became wealthy without the years of toil lean more towards liberalism.
21 posted on 01/31/2004 2:11:55 PM PST by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson