Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Food For Thought From The Chuck Wagon
Chuck Baldwin Live ^ | 1/30/2004 | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 01/31/2004 8:22:26 AM PST by AuthenticLiberal

Why I Write These Columns: An Open Letter To Christian Conservatives


By Chuck Baldwin

Food For Thought From The Chuck Wagon

January 30, 2004



My purpose in writing these columns is to make people think, to confront current events and trends with an intense appreciation for truth. My desire is also to awaken a lethargic population to an ever increasing societal, cultural, political, and spiritual departure from America's historic Christian roots and from a commitment to constitutional government.

When I confronted the foibles and fallacies of President Bill Clinton, Christian conservatives hailed me a hero. I was deluged with congratulatory emails and letters. Their appreciation for my work could not be expressed loudly or often enough.

However, when I confront the foibles and fallacies of President George W. Bush, those same Christian conservatives call me every dirty name in the book. I am suddenly their enemy. Their songs of praise for my work have turned into a cacophony of hate. But amazingly, I am saying the same things now that I said then. So, what has changed?

I submit that what has changed are the attitudes and principles of vast numbers of Christian conservatives. Where once they stood for truth, they now stand for political parties. Where once they gave their loyalty and allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and even the Bible, they now swear loyalty and allegiance to G. W. Bush and the Republican Party. It seems that many Christians have become little more than spineless lackeys for a political machine. They seem to have lost the ability to think critically and objectively.

Scores of readers have chastised me for criticizing President Bush, calling him God's "anointed." Countless numbers of Christians seem to believe that G.W. Bush deserves the kind of unquestioned loyalty that they would give to the Apostle Paul or even to Christ Himself. Of course, such thinking is beyond foolishness; it borders on blasphemy!

G. W. Bush is an elected politician. He was elected President of these United States. Nothing more; nothing less. He has no more divine "anointing" than any other elected politician.

Where was all this "anointing" talk when Bill Clinton was elected President? The same God that permitted Bush to become President permitted Clinton to become President. Yet, Christian conservatives called Clinton the Anti-Christ, whereas they now want to add Bush to the Holy Trinity. However, they can't have it both ways: If Bush is God's "anointed," so was Clinton.

While we are on the subject, it seems lost to most Christian conservatives that G.W. Bush is a member of the same church denomination as Senator Hillary Clinton. Yet, I doubt that we will hear many of them referring to Hillary's divine "anointing."

The fact is, under our form of government, God has given to "we the people" the right and responsibility of selecting our leaders. Therefore, we have the President, the Congress, the courts, and the state and local leaders that we elect.

There is no king or monarch in America! There is no "divine right" to any political party or to any politician to any public office in this country! In America, the people must rule themselves. They do this through their elected lawmakers and elected chief executives.

When the people's elected leaders stray from their oaths of office, when they violate their contracts with the people, when they govern unjustly or unconstitutionally, it is the right and duty of the people to openly criticize them, scold them, and replace them.

One of America's finer presidents, Theodore Roosevelt, said, "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or anyone else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."

My criticisms of President Bush are consistent with my criticisms of President Clinton. They are based on his policies, statements, and administrative decisions. I never attempt to judge his heart, for only God has judgment and authority there. However, I will continue to judge his actions, or inactions, as is my constitutional right and duty to do.

Accordingly, I charge G. W. Bush with posturing himself as a conservative while giving us bigger government than did even Bill Clinton. I charge him with creating the machinery with which a police state may emerge. Furthermore, I charge President Bush with attempting to take more freedoms away from the American people than any president in modern memory.

I also believe that Mr. Bush has redundantly violated his oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and that he has given nothing but lip service to the pro-life and pro-family agendas. It is also my contention that President Bush has jeopardized the security of these United States and has made a mockery of our nation's laws by his treacherous illegal alien amnesty proposal. He also lied to the American people by saying he supported the Second Amendment only later to endorse the Clinton gun ban.

Even worse, I charge Christian conservatives with willingly surrendering their independent thinking as well as their American heritage in order to accommodate President Bush and the Republican Party. I further charge them with selling their spiritual birthright for a mess of political pottage!

We should expect more of our leaders than lip service. Indeed, if any elected office holder talks the Christian talk, he should be held to a higher, not lesser, standard. Beyond that, the one standard that really matters for any elected politician is not his rhetoric, but his loyalty and commitment to America's founding principles. This should be the overriding determinate as to whether he or she is re- elected or un-elected, party affiliation or denominational affiliation notwithstanding.

Therefore, I stand by my criticisms of President Bush. And I will continue to warn the American people of his big government, pseudo-conservative policies. I will not be partaker of his political sins.

Whether readers react with anger or appreciation to these columns is not my responsibility. If, however, these columns can somehow create a hunger for truth, a thirst for freedom, and a reverence for America's founding principles, they will have attained their intended purpose.

© Chuck Baldwin

NOTE TO THE READER:


Chuck Baldwin's commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished, reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does not charge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column is copied intact and that full credit is given and that Chuck's web site address is included.

Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions or advertising who want to run these columns must contact Chuck Baldwin for permission. Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling an interview with Chuck should contact chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com.

Please visit Chuck's web site at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com. When responding, please include your name, city and state.

To subsribe to these columns, send a message to:
majordomo@chuckbaldwinlive.com
with the words subscribe chuckwagon in the body of the message. To unsubsribe, type unsubscribe chuckwagon in the body of the message.



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: baldwin; bush; chuck; chuckbaldwin; conservatism; conservative; socialism; usedfood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
On a different note, for anyone who wants to easily post a story in full I highly suggest you switch from IE to Mozilla Firebird from mozilla.org. It has a feature where you can select a bunch of text on a page, right click on it and it'll let you "view selection source" which'll open a window with the HTML for that are already highlighted for you to copy.
1 posted on 01/31/2004 8:22:27 AM PST by AuthenticLiberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AuthenticLiberal
And I will continue to warn the American people of his big government, pseudo-conservative policies.

Thank you, Mr. Baldwin.

2 posted on 01/31/2004 8:36:33 AM PST by The_Eaglet (Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Soft Money and the Presidental Campaign System-Campaign Finance Reform thread-day 51

3 posted on 01/31/2004 8:37:55 AM PST by The_Eaglet (Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AuthenticLiberal
"Their songs of praise for my work have turned into a cacophony of hate."

Sounds like this boy may suffer a bit from Dixie Chicks Syndrome.
4 posted on 01/31/2004 9:47:44 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuthenticLiberal
two factors yet leave me leaning toward a vote for Bush in
the next election. #1 he is not a Democrat;#2 those two
little words Supreme Court.The first consideration is
important because the policies of the Democratic Party
are more consistant with Soviet Communism than they are the
Christian principles upon which this nation was established.
Unfortunatly his actions suggest Bush has been led to attempt to out Democrat the DNC via the policies he has
proposed. My second point is weakoned by the fact that the
Supreme Court jurists appointed by Republicans are no gaurentee the Constitution will be upheld.SO its an open vote.
5 posted on 01/31/2004 9:48:51 AM PST by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuthenticLiberal
This clown is still mad at Bush for executing Karla Faye Tucker.
6 posted on 01/31/2004 2:15:49 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuthenticLiberal
While we are on the subject, it seems lost to most Christian conservatives that G.W. Bush is a member of the same church denomination as Senator Hillary Clinton.

Has Hitlery even stepped foot in her church? W has, and means it when he goes. It's not a photo-op for him.

7 posted on 01/31/2004 10:22:22 PM PST by Dasaji (Just keep swimming....just keep swimming...just keep swimming, swimming, swimming...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuthenticLiberal; All
Accordingly, I charge G. W. Bush with posturing himself as a conservative while giving us bigger government than did even Bill Clinton. I charge him with creating the machinery with which a police state may emerge. Furthermore, I charge President Bush with attempting to take more freedoms away from the American people than any president in modern memory.

OK, Chukie, let me spell it out for you: 9-1-1

8 posted on 01/31/2004 10:25:51 PM PST by Dasaji (Just keep swimming....just keep swimming...just keep swimming, swimming, swimming...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuthenticLiberal
I also believe that Mr. Bush has redundantly violated his oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and that he has given nothing but lip service to the pro-life and pro-family agendas

Gee, when he put on those brass balls and declared War on Terrorism and actually followed through with it, seems to me he is VERY pro-life and VERY pro-family by protecting the lives on American soil.

9 posted on 01/31/2004 10:28:57 PM PST by Dasaji (Just keep swimming....just keep swimming...just keep swimming, swimming, swimming...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
Sounds like you don't know what you're talking about.

CB has once again exposed the hypocrasy in the so-called Conservative movement.

You should have actually read the article.
10 posted on 02/01/2004 4:43:29 AM PST by Eagle Eye ( Saddam-Who's your Bagh-Daddy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dasaji
Bush just can't keep his hand out of the cash register.
11 posted on 02/01/2004 4:51:18 AM PST by FSPress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
"This clown" as you put it, has done more for real Conservatism than 99% of freepers who post or lurk, you included. When was the last time you hosted a meeting with Jesse Lee Petersen? Chuck's church is where I met that man. The same for Howard Phillips.

CB is unabashedly prolife and pro 2A, and has no room for compromise on those issues.

Yeah, I can see that when you don't have anything of value to say, you resort to personal attacks (name calling) on the messenger instead of having anything intelligent to say against the message.

Yeah, I know this guy and would entrust him with my life any day. He's got something unheard of in today's Conservative circles: principles and stones.
12 posted on 02/01/2004 4:51:55 AM PST by Eagle Eye ( Saddam-Who's your Bagh-Daddy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AuthenticLiberal; hellinahandcart
Theodore Roosevelt, said, "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or anyone else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."

A very good quote. I'm saving this one.

13 posted on 02/01/2004 5:37:55 AM PST by sauropod (Better to have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Theodore Roosevelt had a way with words. He generated a lot of "keepers".

Chuck Baldwin, on the other hand...if he doesn't bother to correct his own errors and misstatements, his stated objective of creating "an intense appreciation of the truth" is laughable.
14 posted on 02/01/2004 5:45:29 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
If you noticed dahling, I wasn't praising CB ;-).
15 posted on 02/01/2004 5:53:47 AM PST by sauropod (Better to have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
But it turns out that you don't know what you're talking about; while I agree with this guy on many points, I don't agree with "minister" Baldwin on is his celebrity-like need to be exempt from criticism.
16 posted on 02/01/2004 8:19:25 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AuthenticLiberal
Countless numbers of Christians seem to believe that G.W. Bush deserves the kind of unquestioned loyalty that they would give to the Apostle Paul or even to Christ Himself.

We do? I must of missed that memo.



And thanks for the tip on posting.
17 posted on 02/01/2004 9:12:09 AM PST by Valin (Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Hey, I call 'em as I see 'em. Baldwin's a member of the Constitution Party, and is ultimately encouraging his supporters to waste their votes on his party, thus bringing us another Democrat as president. Am I supposed to say "Yippee" to that? And look at his old articles on his site -- it's clear he does harbor resentment against Bush for executing Karla Faye Tucker. Sorry if I insulted your great hero.
18 posted on 02/01/2004 10:02:33 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
BTW, the Roosevelt quote (which the Dixie Chicks had on their website) was not from when TR was president. It was from 1912, when he ran against the incumbent, Howard Taft. And, of course, Roosevelt running as a third party candidate cost Taft the election, and brought us Democrat Woodrow Wilson as president.
19 posted on 02/01/2004 10:06:25 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
Howard Taft=William Howard Taft
20 posted on 02/01/2004 10:31:54 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson