Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Privacy Act Subverted {Ron Smith}
WBAL AM 1090 Baltimore ^ | Friday, January 30, 2004 | Ron Smith

Posted on 01/31/2004 6:35:52 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park

WBAL AM Radio 1090 {11} Baltimore

Ron Smith's
"Something to Say"
Commentary


Weekday Mornings at 6:50AM on WBAL Radio

The Privacy Act Subverted
Friday, January 30, 2004
Ron Smith

Last week, the Washington Times reported that a giant corporation that owns all sorts of hotels, mortgage lenders, real-estate companies, and tax accounting services is “getting into other businesses. Yours.”

The Cendant Corp. is working on compiling a database of its millions of customers, one that would include more than 200 pieces of personal information. According to the newspaper story, this is perfectly legal, and furthermore it is a “standard practice among virtually every large company around the world to use databases to better serve their customers.”

These portraits of a person’s consumer habits include all sorts of information useful to marketing: credit card numbers, mortgage balances, occupation, household income and a purchasing-power index.

Since you probably are at least somewhat aware that such data collection is the heart and soul of the direct marketing industry, and that we are all tracked pretty closely all our lives, why am I bothering to tell you this?

For one reason: Deep in the story by Audrey Hudson is this paragraph:

“Although the Privacy Act prevents the federal government from gathering information in citizens, critics say it hasn’t stopped federal agencies from seeking privately generated data, a practice that continues to grow.”

Big Brother watches us all the time, Privacy act or no Privacy Act. Surprised?

THIS article at WBAL AM 1090 Baltimore


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: nwo; privacy; ronsmith
All, Whoda thunkit? Peace and love, George.
1 posted on 01/31/2004 6:35:52 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
Government isn't stupid, why bother setting up giant databases that can be outlawed when all you have to do is allow your corporate partners to collect the info and then govt just pays for a query?
2 posted on 01/31/2004 6:41:05 AM PST by agitator (The 9th Amendment says what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; *"NWO"; farmfriend; editor-surveyor; harpseal; A. Pole; Willie Green
"critics say it hasn’t stopped federal agencies from seeking privately generated data"

Guys, "Public Private Partnerships {PPPs} in action. Big MAMA is WATCHING!! Peace and love, George.

3 posted on 01/31/2004 6:42:01 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park (FREEDOM!!!!!!!!! GO PAT GO!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
“Although the Privacy Act prevents the federal government from gathering information in citizens, critics say it hasn’t stopped federal agencies from seeking privately generated data, a practice that continues to grow.”

I've worked quite a bit with third-party data. In a way, personal privacy is a lot like personal security - don't count on the government to provide either.

Just as you are best off providing your own security by arming yourself, you are also best off protecting your personal information by taking a few simple steps:

Pay cash when possible

Don't list your phone number

If you do get a telemarketing call, be very uncooperative and demand that they take you off their list. Telemarketers are not in the business of wasting their time.

Use a PO Box for magazines and other non-essential mail.

Take every opportunity to remove yourself from any marketing lists that you happen to land upon.

Demand that companies such as your telephone service provider not sell your name to hot lists.

Make sure that any stores where you sign up for discount cards will not sell their data to third parties.

If you get a magazine subscription, screw up the spelling of your first name or use a different middle initial for each subscription. This also allows you to track how your name is sold.

I only actively do steps 1 through 3, and I hardly ever get junk mail or telemarketing calls. Likewise, I've worked with third-party data, and I LOOOVE it when I have credit card numbers to work with - it makes matching the data a cinch.

4 posted on 01/31/2004 6:46:31 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard Dean - all bike and no path)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Government isn't stupid, why bother setting up giant databases that can be outlawed when all you have to do is allow your corporate partners to collect the info and then govt just pays for a query?

I've got to revisit the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 to see if there are any implications for government use of third-party data. I just finished a stint as a contractor at a large bank, and we had serious limitations as to how we could view the data - so we had to house marketing databases at a third-party vendor such as Acxiom. I imagine the government exempted itself from GLBA, but it would be interesting to check.

5 posted on 01/31/2004 6:49:30 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard Dean - all bike and no path)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Answered my own question. GLBA doesn't have any direct impact on government use of third-party data. However, it does require financial institutions to allow customers an "opt-out" for information sharing with third parties. I would encourage anyone who is concerned about their own privacy to contact any financial institution with which they conduct business and sign up for any opt-out provisions that are available.
6 posted on 01/31/2004 6:59:16 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard Dean - all bike and no path)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Add to your list: use Ad-Aware to scan your computer for spyware and use a "hosts" file to block ad sites from invading your computer (do a search on Google for details). And as you surf know that every keystroke is being watched by somebody.
7 posted on 01/31/2004 7:17:59 AM PST by Ronly Bonly Jones (The more things change...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: agitator
"...corporate partners to collect the info and then govt just pays for a query?"

"Government just pays" is the key phrase.

The 5th amendment requires that.

"...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."

So, that is one brake that can and should be applied to our government attempting unfettered access to the data.

The other brake to apply to the transfer of this data from corporations to government is for we as consumers to be aware of corporations that would be willing to share that data and begin economic boycotts of such corporations.

Corporations always respond quickly and appropriately when faced with potential lost revenues and subsequent lost profits.

8 posted on 01/31/2004 7:23:33 AM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tahiti
"...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."

Won't work. The data is the property of third party vendors (or second-party sellers), and the government pays those parties for it.

9 posted on 01/31/2004 7:25:55 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard Dean - all bike and no path)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tahiti
Police state snooping exists because government has too much time and money on their hands.

When I stand in line behind some stupid broad paying for a single tube of lipstick with a credit card, I have very little hope that either the data or govt access to it is going to diminish any time soon.
10 posted on 02/01/2004 4:53:35 AM PST by agitator (The 9th Amendment says what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
You said it, cash - cash - cash - cash - cash
11 posted on 02/01/2004 4:56:25 AM PST by agitator (The 9th Amendment says what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson