Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reagan: It's time to strike back
DodgeGlobe.com ^ | January 30, 2004 | By Michael Reagan

Posted on 01/30/2004 10:00:31 PM PST by 11th_VA

Hatred of President Bush is what drives the Democratic candidates for their party's presidential nomination, says Larry Sabato, the widely respected political observer at the University of Virginia ­ and he thinks it's time for President Bush to wake up to that fact and go on the offensive. "The Democrats have dominated the news media ­ every channel, every hour, with the exception of the State of the Union address," he says. "Democrats' unity of opposition to Bush on every issue has kept the campaign a symphony rather than a cacophony, building toward a crescendo of anti-Bush fervor. The Democrats are pumped. The Bush White House appears blissfully ignorant of that reality, at least early in the campaign season."

He's right. Back in 1996, when Bill Clinton was running for re-election, the Democrats started very early in the campaign to spend a lot of money to derail any Republican's chance of winning. It was the smart thing to do and it worked.

This year it's important that people be reminded that there are two primary campaigns going on, side-by-side with the Democratic primaries there are also Republican primaries.

But it's the Democrats who get all the media attention. Every day. Edwards gives his same speech, Kerry gives his same speech, and Dean gives his same speech: "down with America, down with the president" and all the rest of that demagogic claptrap.

The President of the United States, however, gets almost no time at all. If I were the President at this stage, I'd be showing up for the primaries. I would have been in Iowa and New Hampshire, and I'd be in Missouri and South Carolina and every other state holding primaries.

He should show up on primary nights, thank the Republicans who voted for him. and discount what all these people are saying. Instead, what have we been getting? Six hours of "America sucks, the president is a stupid idiot, America sucks." Six solid hours of that filth.

You get around that by having the President show up on primary night, thank the people who voted for him and set the record straight. Being President, he will get air time and we won't have to listen to six unbroken hours of slander against him and his party. He can start now to demolish all the untruths, blatant lies and distortions about him being peddled by the Democratic demagogues.

When Senator Kerry attacks the President for being allegedly dominated by all those evil special interests President Bush would have an opportunity to point out that Kerry's party is totally owned by special interests. They couldn't exist for one minute without the financial and political support of the trial lawyers, the abortion industry, big labor, the teacher's unions, the radical environmentalist movement and the rest of the motley crew who own the Democratic party lock, stock and barrel.

What Kerry is saying is that the Republican "special interests," which is growth and the economy, must go so he can bring his special interests to the White House and pay off the trial lawyers and the abortion industry and all the rest for their support.

All this garbage is all going unanswered and it needs to be rebutted by the President. Five Democrats, three of whom shouldn't even be in the race, are getting all the publicity bad mouthing the President. He's getting none.

The American people must be warned that if they vote for John Kerry or any other Democrat the war in the Middle East will end there and begin here. You won't have to worry about body bags coming back from Iraq because they'll be coming home from the mall.

Vote for the Democrats and the economy will turn sour. They are anti-business which is where the 401K' s of millions of middle class Americans are invested. But the Democrats attack the very source of our 401K retirement funds ­ business. Most of our financial resources are invested in the market, and these people want to ruin the market, ruin the economy and lose the war.

And nobody is in a better position to tell these truths to the American people that President Bush. He should get out there on the campaign trail now.

Mike Reagan, the eldest son of former president Ronald Reagan, is heard on more than 200 talk radio stations nationally as part of the Radio America Network. Comments to mereagan@hotmail.com for Mike.


TOPICS: Editorial; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush2004; gwb2004; michaelreagan; sabato
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: CyberAnt
I LOVE THIS POP-UP AD !!!
61 posted on 01/30/2004 11:40:03 PM PST by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Pitchfork
"We had 8 years of fantastic economic performance it was just so good we stopped watching out for scumbags like Eron's CEO"

1) The 8 years started under Bush I 18 months before Clinton was elected.
2) Enron's CEO was one of Clintons best friends. He went all over the world with Ron Brown on a Gov't plane. The Dems changed the laws on reporting in 1994 (Joey Liberman) and let companies report bogus numbers.

The facts are out there if you want to really see them !

62 posted on 01/30/2004 11:42:57 PM PST by america-rules (It's US or THEM so what part don't you understand ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: whadizit
Well .. if your ideas were so good .. you would be in charge! What does that tell you ..??
63 posted on 01/30/2004 11:43:10 PM PST by CyberAnt ("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pitchfork
Statistics can be made to prove anything at all.

I and others have explained and explained and EXPLAINED everything you need to know...you just ignore it.

Carter's and Clinton's first terms were ruinous for the economy and the markets, almost immediately. Clinton's unConstitutional, retroactive tax raises hit hard.

Reagan and Bush's TAX CUTS raised all boats.

Some things take a long time to hit, others don't and sustained growth is only possible with tax cuts!

You're back to that bulldozer and you'll NEVER get out of that hole now. LOL

64 posted on 01/30/2004 11:43:35 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
You should print the thread out for hubby... give him an after-dinner chuckle ;-)
65 posted on 01/30/2004 11:44:55 PM PST by Tamzee (W '04..... America may not survive a Democrat at this point in our history....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Pitchfork
Just out of curiosity ,, how old are you and where were you educated?
66 posted on 01/30/2004 11:46:49 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ...... /~normsrevenge - FoR California Propositions/Initiatives info...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Anybody who thinks raising taxes is the way to cure the deficit, can be easily compared to the Physicians of the 1800's who believed the only way to cure Yellow Fever was to drain all the blood out of the patient

We could just call this Butter-On-Burns Bogus Boom Bloviation.... or No-Benjamins, for short ;-)

67 posted on 01/30/2004 11:49:35 PM PST by Tamzee (W '04..... America may not survive a Democrat at this point in our history....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw...he hates stupidity worse than I do. He wouldn't find it funny at all. :-(
68 posted on 01/30/2004 11:52:33 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
Well, frankly I'm a big fan of index funds and a huge fan of 'spydrs' so I didn't see a big hit until after Bush took office. You must have been deep in the NASDAQ.

Here is a link to the S&P 500 chart from 85 to the present. More empirical evidence of 90's growth in this countries 500 largest companies (I doubt pets.com is in this index).

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=^GSPC&t=my&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=

69 posted on 01/30/2004 11:52:47 PM PST by Pitchfork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Pitchfork
You're playing with SPOOS ? No wonder your 401K's in trouble. Leave that to the BIG BOYS. :-)
70 posted on 01/30/2004 11:55:27 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
You are so right about Microsoft. I have always thought that the attack on Microsoft is what set off the beginning of the end of the 90's bubble.

In the liberals hunt for monsters, they became monsters themselves.
71 posted on 01/31/2004 12:00:18 AM PST by CyberAnt ("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pitchfork
The S&P 500 is not a good barometer for the overall economy. The Nasdaq was crashing like the Hindenberg while the S&P was steady from 1998 thru 2000
72 posted on 01/31/2004 12:02:43 AM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
"Ernest Goes to Wall Street" ;-)
73 posted on 01/31/2004 12:03:25 AM PST by Tamzee (W '04..... America may not survive a Democrat at this point in our history....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
I usually am...right. LOL

Rubin didn't rein algore in, that WAS the start of the BUBBLE being burst.

74 posted on 01/31/2004 12:06:35 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
What are you on drugs? The 500 largest companies in the US with a capitalization that reflects 80% of the value of the stock market is a poor indication of the economy? Ok..what color is the sky on your planet?

BTW I invest in spydrs (SPY) S&P 500 depository recipts which acts like an index fund with no loads, fees or crooked fund managers. Not SPOOS. I'm no options day trader. But, hold, dollar cost average, faith in the overall strength of the US economy.
75 posted on 01/31/2004 12:07:17 AM PST by Pitchfork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Yeah, something like that. LOL
76 posted on 01/31/2004 12:07:26 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Pitchfork
I said the overall economy, not how the top companies are doing. just as Jobs are a lagging indicator in a recovery, the S&P is the last to feel the impact of a fall
77 posted on 01/31/2004 12:14:28 AM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
If you are referring to the Nasdaq or Enron, Worldcom, you are correct. But to attribute the economic boom of the '90s to the dotcoms is to ignore the incredible jump in the S & P or the Dow, "the old economy". The Dow was just above 3800 when the Republicans took control of Congress at the beginning of 1995. Today, it finished at 10,488. This is an 11.2% annual rate of return on price alone. With dividends reinvested, it is probably 13 to 14%, well ahead of the historical averages. My 401K and IRAs did quite well in the past 5 years, being primarily invested in real estate and small cap value stock funds. The investors who chased the dotcoms got burned. Some made out well - my old college roommate is the Chief Medical Officer of a biotech, and sold $1.8 million of his stock at $72 per share in March of 2000, just below its peak of $75 - its now at about $5.
78 posted on 01/31/2004 1:00:16 AM PST by KAUAIBOUND (Hawaii - a Socialist paradise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pitchfork
I love how you folks can argue two opposite ideas simultaneously

You forgot this one:

1. The entire boom of the 90s was complete BS. It was all smoke and mirrors....

BUT...

2. It was all thanks to Ronald Reagan...

or alternatively...

3. It was thanks to the GOP takeover of Congress.

LOL. Well, if it was BS, and we have Reagan and the GOP to blame, uh....

79 posted on 01/31/2004 3:06:42 AM PST by Huck (Hold on to your wallet--the President's awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Pitchfork
Listen, I think it's great that someone is having this debate. Stay clear of personal attacks and stick with it. I would like to see this continue. Hopefully, some substantive debaters will show up and you guys can hash it out. I will be lurking because I think it is interesting.
80 posted on 01/31/2004 3:17:10 AM PST by Huck (Hold on to your wallet--the President's awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson