Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Budget To Predict FY '04 Deficit Over $500B (Is Big Spender Bush trying to lose the election?)
Quicken.com ^ | January 30, 2004 | Unknown

Posted on 01/30/2004 8:17:30 PM PST by TheEaglehasLanded

Bush Budget To Predict FY '04 Deficit Over $500B Thursday, January 29, 2004 04:01 PM ET Printer-friendly version

WASHINGTON [AP]--U.S. President George W. Bush's new budget will project that the just-enacted prescription drug program and Medicare overhaul will cost one- third more than previously estimated and will predict a deficit exceeding $500 billion for this year, congressional aides said Thursday.

Bush's new budget will estimate this year's budget deficit at about $520 billion, the congressional sources said. That would easily surpass the $375 billion shortfall of last year, the highest deficit ever in dollar terms.

Just Monday, the Congressional Budget Office projected this year's red ink would total $477 billion.

The new estimate comes as Bush braces for a difficult election-season fight with Congress over spending - after a budget year that he can hardly expect to top.

Instead of a $400 billion 10-year price tag, Bush's 2005 budget will estimate the Medicare bill's cost at about $540 billion, said aides who spoke on condition of anonymity. Bush will submit on Monday a federal budget for the fiscal year 2005, which starts next Oct. 1.

Bush just signed the Medicare measure into law last month. While it was moving through Congress, Bush, White House officials and congressional Republican leaders had assured doubting conservatives that the bill's costs would stay within the $400 billion estimate.

Some conservatives voted against the legislation anyway, and many of them are already angry that Bush has presided over excessive increases in spending and budget deficits.

"I'm not the least bit surprised," said conservative Rep. John Shadegg, R- Ariz., who voted against the Medicare bill in November and who said he had heard that the cost estimate would rise. "Historically, our estimates of what these programs will cost have been so far off as to be meaningless."

White House budget office spokesman Chad Kolton wouldn't comment on the Medicare figures. But an administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, acknowledged that the estimate would rise to nearly $540 billion.

"Both numbers provide what you can call a reasonable range of possible future costs for Medicare," the official said. "These are complex estimates, based on hundreds of individual programs, decisions and potential actions over an extended period of time."

CBO, Congress' nonpartisan fiscal analyst, estimated the bill's 10-year cost at $395 billion. But administration officials repeatedly stood by the $400 billion figure, which Bush had included in the budget he proposed last February.

Although Bush sends his 2005 budget to Congress next week, lawmakers only last week completed their spending work for 2004. That process saw Bush win virtually all his major priorities including a tax cut, new Medicare prescription drug coverage, funds to fight a war with Iraq, and overall spending restraint.

"He wanted a carpet that looked like X, and generally speaking he got a carpet that looked like X," said Richard Kogan, who analyzes the budget for the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

The Republican-run Congress avoided overt clashes with Bush but didn't roll over completely.

Lawmakers trimmed his defense plans while boosting funds for highways, Amtrak and veterans. They ignored Bush's plan to make tax cuts permanent, scaled back his proposal to stop taxing corporate dividends, derailed his energy bill and added thousands of home-district projects to spending measures.

Even so, the results were a far cry from the "dead on arrival" label applied to the spending blueprints of some of Bush's recent predecessors. Democrats and moderate Republicans often gave that assessment to plans written by the first President Bush and President Ronald Reagan, who were forced to accept both tax and spending increases.

On the other hand, despite the GOP takeover of Congress two years into his tenure, President Bill Clinton won frequent spending concessions from lawmakers wary of battling him. Bush has followed a similar pattern.

"It would be hard to say he's not getting what he wants," Stan Collender, a senior vice president who follows the budget for the accounting firm Fleischman- Hillard.

Bush has yet to cast a veto after three years in office. He often uses the threat of a veto to get his way, issuing 19 as Congress considered the 13 annual spending bills for this year. In the end, lawmakers dropped challenges on issues like administration plans to change overtime pay rules and divert more government work to private contractors.

Major priorities Bush proposed last year included:

- Tax reductions of $1.3 trillion over 10 years. The bill he signed had $330 billion in tax cuts. That number is expected to grow should lawmakers, as anticipated, make some of its temporary reductions permanent. Congress added $20 billion he didn't seek for financially strapped states.

- $400 billion over a decade for revamping Medicare and adding prescription drug coverage. Bush last month signed a bill resembling his proposal.

- $87 billion this year for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, $500 million less than he got. The final bill gave him $1.7 billion less than the $18.6 billion he wanted to rebuild Iraq and less flexibility than he wanted for controlling the money.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 520billiondeficit; bigspender; bush; fy2005
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: PhiKapMom; onyx; nopardons; Texasforever; MissAmericanPie
Can someone tell me how a group of Anti-Bush Freepers that claim to be "Libs" can go on immigration threads and Bash Bush when their own Party is for open borders and welcome to all?

Because they are too stoned to read the party platform? Just a guess. The second guess is sheer stupidity and/or a taste for suicide.

41 posted on 01/31/2004 12:01:11 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
LOL!!!! You definitely have a way with words. BTW, I agree!
42 posted on 01/31/2004 12:03:20 AM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; nopardons
This might be closer:

Registrant:
Cragg, Daniel (FEAEAVCUKD)
943 Wild Rose Court
Eagan, MN 55123
US

Domain Name: CONSERVATIVESAGAINSTBUSH.COM

Administrative Contact:
Cragg, Daniel (APHRNPIUGI) djcragg@mac.com
943 Wild Rose Court
Eagan, MN 55123
US
651-994-9525
43 posted on 01/31/2004 12:04:37 AM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Four hours is too long for a Democrat to sit in the Oval Office, let alone four years. Vote W '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
That's even worse isn't it. Wonder what George Washington would have to say about a President that refuses to acknowledge U.S. sovereignty and borders, much less refuses to defend them?
44 posted on 01/31/2004 12:04:48 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
DITTO.
45 posted on 01/31/2004 12:05:46 AM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Wonder what George Washington would have to say about a President that refuses to acknowledge U.S. sovereignty and borders, much less refuses to defend them?

What in blue blazes does that have to do with veteran retirement benefits?

46 posted on 01/31/2004 12:08:32 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
Sorry Bush...but you can't win by gaining lefties and losing your base. The left already has a party. You are destroying yours.
47 posted on 01/31/2004 12:09:43 AM PST by Capitalism2003 (Got principles? http://www.LP.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...and what do we know/can find out about Danny, I wonder. :-)
48 posted on 01/31/2004 12:10:13 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
Sorry Bush...but you can't win by gaining lefties and losing your base. The left already has a party. You are destroying yours.

WE ARE DOOOOOMED!

49 posted on 01/31/2004 12:10:53 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; deport
Maybe we could get deport on the case. He's a heck of a researcher.
50 posted on 01/31/2004 12:11:23 AM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Four hours is too long for a Democrat to sit in the Oval Office, let alone four years. Vote W '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Not by much. LOL
51 posted on 01/31/2004 12:11:32 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003

Ha ha. Like you're the base. Give me a break. LP.org.
52 posted on 01/31/2004 12:11:40 AM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I already made as much sense of that as I could. LOL
53 posted on 01/31/2004 12:13:02 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Wonder what George Washington would have to say about a President that refuses to acknowledge U.S. sovereignty and borders, much less refuses to defend them?

He'd say,"Bill Clinton you are eternally damned,as are the rest of your Rat comrades and those who would facilitate them coming into office, like the narrow-minded,uncomprehending ,third party loons who hate an honest man with courage and clarity of vision and soul."

I think that would cover it, don't you?

54 posted on 01/31/2004 12:13:39 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Ha ha. Like you're the base

But he worked so hard on that screen name.

55 posted on 01/31/2004 12:14:45 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Makes absolutely zero sense to me. I was going to post the Executive Summary but figured I would wait until a bunch of them were on a thread and then hit them with their own platform since they want Pres Bush to give them 100% of what they want!
56 posted on 01/31/2004 12:15:21 AM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
LOL, keep going, your not finished yet are you?
57 posted on 01/31/2004 12:15:23 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Good idea ! :-)
58 posted on 01/31/2004 12:15:24 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
He's a student.

Also, here's something from Pacifica (how lovely):

Conservative critics of President Bush launch website

Increasingly, criticism of the Bush administration and specifically its policies in Iraq is coming from people outside of traditional Democratic and peace activist circles. Recent polls have indicated that the President's overall approval rating has dropped to its lowest point since the terrorist attacks of September 11th-two years ago. A USA Today/ CNN/ Gallup poll taken earlier this month shows that barely more than half of Americans approve of Bush's on-the-job rating, and if the election were held today, he would hold only a 4-point lead over a yet-to-be-named Democratic rival.

Of particular concern to Republican strategists is the growing disenchantment with Bush, even among much of his usual, conservative base of support. According to a recent survey of American voters, nearly a quarter of self-described conservatives nationwide gave a thumbs-down to the President. One such critic has even created a website - www.conservativesagainstbush.com to "propound the conservative principals this administration has forsaken."

Tape: Daniel Cragg is the creator of the website www.conservativesagainstbush.com

59 posted on 01/31/2004 12:15:24 AM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Four hours is too long for a Democrat to sit in the Oval Office, let alone four years. Vote W '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Nothing just thinking out loud.
60 posted on 01/31/2004 12:15:53 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson