Hugh & Series, Critical & Pulled by JimRob
Special to FreeRepublic | 17 December 2003 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)
This is nothing like the usual whine by someone whose post was pulled. JimRob pulled my previous thread for a good reason. "If direct fund-raising were permitted on FR, it would soon be wall-to-wall fund-raising."
So, let's start again correctly. This is about civil disobedience to support the First Amendment and challenge the TERRIBLE CFR decision of the Supreme Court to uphold a terrible law passed by Congress and signed by President Bush.
All who are interested in an in-your-face challenge to the 30- and 60-day ad ban in the Campaign Finance "Reform" Act, please join in. The pattern is this: I'm looking for at least 1,000 people to help the effort. I will run the ad, and risk fines or jail time to make it work -- AND get national support.
But there should be NO mentions of money in this thread, and not in Freepmail either. This is JimRob's electronic home, and we should all abide his concerns.
Put your comments here. Click on the link above, and send me your e-mail addresses. I will get back to you by regular e-mail with the practical details.
This CAN be done. This SHOULD be done. But it MUST be done in accord with JimRob's guidelines.
Fair enough?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1042394/posts
Update
I've already tested the idea of my in-your-face challenge ads, first in the print media and then deliberately illegal on TV, with certain editors I have a long relationship with. I could trust these two gentlemen, one in the print media and the other in the broadcast media, with a "heads up" on what I am planning. Both said they wanted to know, in advance, when I am about to do this.
The bottom line is clear. If I am willing to put my neck on the line, with the possibilities of a fine and jail time, THAT effort will put CFR back on the front page in all media. And that is part of the point. There's not much value of going in-your-face against the enemies of the First Amendment unless the press takes up the story and spreads the word. It is now clear they will do exactly that.
Update 2
QUICK PROGRESS REPORT, ANSWERING A SUPPORTER'S QUESTION:
We have about 15% of the needed 1,000 sign-ups.
Spread the word, direct folks to the front page link on my website.
Google-bomb the phrase "anti-CFR" directing readers to that page and link. (We're already #2 and #4 on Google.)
Target date is now August, since the NC primary looks to be put back to September. (Remember, the ad isn't illegal until the 29th day before the election.)
Cordially,
John / Billybob
Note if you are interested in more on this please contact myself or Congressman Billybob
PPS I am looking for others to do some of these. In order to bring different prospectives to this subject
"Law" that is never promulgated--i.e., is never made known to the public--is not really law, and is not binding on the conscience. A law that is so complex that it is by its very nature incomprehensible is IN PRINCIPLE incapable of being promulgated. Thus, it is by its very nature not binding on the conscience. It should be obeyed, and will be obeyed, only out of fear of the police.
"Matsui, the California representative who heads the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, confesses, "I didn't realize what all was in it."
This is so disingenuous. He knew; they ALL knew. There isn't a politician alive that will vote for a bill purporting to limit their access to campaign funds without thoroughly understanding every single word in it.
They are all still playing "pass-the-buck" politics to avoid accepting responsibility for angering voters by passing a VERY VERY BAD LAW. This is the same ploy they use to give themselves a pay raise and then tell us they didn't vote for it. Well, sure, they didn't. Years ago, Congress passed a nifty little rule that allows them to get away with this. Here's how it works: if a bill sits on the docket with NO action taken on it for 72 hours (not sent to committee or called for a floor vote) it is considered automatically passed and sent to the President for his signature.
Does anyone actually believe that the Congress doesn't know what Bill has their pay raise in it? Does anyone actually believe that these thieves didn't know what was in CFR (McCain-Feingold)? They knew; ALL of them. Remember, these people lie for a living.