Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: par4
Based on the evidence so far presented

Hee hee, so my evidence is no good, but yours is fine to use in this discussion? Can you say EXTREEMLY biased?

5 posted on 01/30/2004 8:50:55 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ClintonBeGone
Hee hee, so my evidence is no good, but yours is fine to use in this discussion? Can you say EXTREEMLY biased?

Excuse me. What evidence have you presented?

15 posted on 01/30/2004 9:27:03 AM PST by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ClintonBeGone
Hee hee, so my evidence is no good, but yours is fine to use in this discussion? Can you say EXTREEMLY biased?

Sorry to disagree with your facts, but I must have missed them. The only evidence that I've seen so far is that he legally purchased around 2000 prescription pills over the course of 6 or so months. I have yet to see anything credible that indicates he purchased controlled substances from other than legitimate sources, ie: Pharmacies.

Since the prosecutor has apparently now limited his investigation to "Doctor Shopping", I also have to presume that there isn't a whole lot of evidence of Rush purchasing controlled substances from his housemaid or whomever else he was in cahoots with. If there were such evidence, then the prosecutor would have already taken that to a Grand Jury and used the subpoena powers of the grand jury to open the doctor and pharmaceutical records to look deeper, not the other way around.

Acually, I have no dog in this fight, I just would like to see something concrete before I'm willing to concede that anyone has comitted a crime. Innuendo isn't fact, but if you actually have facts, I'd like to see them.

No facts, no evidence, no crime...

17 posted on 01/30/2004 10:31:26 AM PST by par4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ClintonBeGone
Hee hee, so my evidence is no good, but yours is fine to use in this discussion? Can you say EXTREEMLY biased?

Are you talking about the evidence that Rush was running a drug ring? (I think that was a leak from the Palm Beach County Prosecutors' Office.)

Or the evidence that Rush was laundering money for his drug ring? (I think that was a leak from the Palm Beach County Prosecutors' Office. It consisted of allegations Rush had withdrawn some of his money from his bank account.)

Or perhaps the evidence that Rush was doctor shopping. (I think that was a leak from the Palm Beach County Prosecutors' Office. It consisted of the list of 4 doctors Rush had visited .. 2 surgeons' offices and 2 doctors at his primary physician's office.)
47 posted on 01/31/2004 5:20:11 PM PST by gitmo (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson