[par4]

Can anyone say that an accusation of BREAKING the law is anyway less offensive than an accusation of lying under oath?

Non sequiter of the day...An accusation is nothing more than one man or a group's assumption that another committed a crime - it is not proof, it's not even close to reasonable doubt. When actual charges are filed and real evidence of a crime is presented, then, and only then, can anyone even begin to assume that Rush made a mistake. Based on the evidence so far presented, taking 8 or 9 prescription pain killers a day is hardly comparable to committing perjury in court, and it's darn well less offensice than firing cruise missils at a pharmeceutical plant to distract attention from accusations of sexual harassment of an intern.

[ClintonBeGone]

Based on the evidence so far presented

Hee hee, so my evidence is no good, but yours is fine to use in this discussion? Can you say EXTREEMLY biased?

[lawdude]

"...and it's darn well less offensice than firing cruise missils at a pharmeceutical plant to distract attention from accusations of sexual harassment of an intern."

But, don't you know that these missles totally destroyed all of Saddam H's stockpiles of WMD. That's why we have been unable to find them. He is my hero. [sigh]

GAG!