[sauropod]

"Defendant GWB has purported to the American People, this Court and the Plaintiff that the infamous attacks of “911” were directly masterminded by Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda Network terrorists (hereinafter “OBL”), almost immediately after the attacks. Yet, Defendant GWB has not been forthright and honest with regard to his administration’s pre-knowledge of the potential of the “911” attacks...

and Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendant GWB to justify why her husband Louis Neil Mariani died on “911.’ Plaintiff believes Defendant GWB is invoking a long standard operating procedure of invoking national security and executive privilege claims to suppress the basis of this lawsuit that Defendant GWB, et al., failed to act and prevent the “911” attacks. This Court must see through this and Plaintiff argues from the onset, the reasons why “911” occurred are no longer a national security risk, but, a national security disgrace and tragedy.

How can somebody say this in legal documents? Isn't this slander or libel?

[sauropod]

Question to you too.

[hellinahandcart]

I suppose you could say anything you wanted, if you didn't care about it being taken seriously.

Hard to believe this guy makes a living as a lawyer.

I think they just wanted this "out there", so they could get their faces on television, and so anti-Bush websites would have something to link to...