Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Austrians stunned by Nobel prize-winner's Nazi ideology
Scotland on Sunday ^ | 25 Jan 2004 | CLARE CHAPMAN

Posted on 01/30/2004 3:38:01 AM PST by gd124

AN EMINENT Austrian scientist who specialised in genetics and won the Nobel prize for his work on malaria has been revealed as an exponent of racial purity who advocated the forced sterilisation for people regarded as genetically impure.

The discovery that Julius Wagner-Jauregg was a member of the Nazi party and backed Hitler’s ideas about racial purity has shocked Austrians, who have named schools, roads and hospitals after the respected former physician and psychiatrist.

Wagner-Jauregg, considered one of the leading scientists of his time, was honoured with the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1927 for his work in the field of malaria inoculation.

He died in 1940, but, instead of being discredited after the war, his role promoting Nazi ideology and close links with them were swept under the carpet.

The truth came to light after a Vienna city councillor, David Ellensohn, called for a review of all people awarded honorary status at the city’s central cemetery in the period under Nazi occupation.

A team of historians was commissioned to examine the lives of more than 200 Austrians in this category. They found Wagner-Jauregg was a proponent of racial purity before the country became part of Hitler’s Third Reich in 1938.

Member of the commission, Wolfgang Neugebauer from the Documentation Centre of the Austrian Resistance, has presented the findings to the Vienna City Council.

Wagner-Jauregg applied to become a member of the National Socialist Party (NSDAP) in 1939 after calling for a ban on "people with mental diseases and people with criminal genes" from reproducing.

According to his biographer, Madga Whitrow, his first attempt to join the party failed on account of "race". Whitrow said Wagner-Jauregg’s first wife, Balbine Frumkin, was Jewish. But in her biography she wrote: "It isn’t clear if his unhappy marriage to Frumkin fuelled his anti-Semitic sentiments."

Nevertheless, Wagner-Jauregg continued to promote his theories and said people with mental diseases or criminal genes were "individuals who, because of lasting genetic mental defects, are a danger to the community and unable to fit in".

He also backed a proposal for a law to carry out sterilisations for "eugenic purposes", which was rejected by the pre-war parliament. Working women were also commented upon by Wagner-Jauregg. He described them as "degenerate" and said they would be unable "to bear children or breast feed".

Head of the commission, Kurt Scholz, said: "I cannot recommend Wagner-Jauregg’s honorary status is maintained. His statements concerning ‘racial care’ and attitude after 1938 alone are enough."

He added that a public debate on academics’ participation in Nazi doctrines following the end of the Second World War was absolutely non-existent, and Wagner-Jauregg’s role had been a whitewash.

Green councillor Ellensohn said not only should Wagner-Jauregg’s honorary status be withdrawn, but "in face of the facts - both about his activities in illegal Nazi circles and his membership in the NSDAP - all public places named after him should be renamed".

Vienna City Council has promised a full review and expects to make a decision in summer.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: austria; doctor; ideology; nazi; nobelprize

1 posted on 01/30/2004 3:38:02 AM PST by gd124
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gd124
He's dead, Jim
2 posted on 01/30/2004 4:21:37 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (It is always tempting to impute unlikely virtues to the cute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
His viewpoint is identical to Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood.
3 posted on 01/30/2004 4:31:40 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
Well, duh! They give the "peace" prize to genocidal terrorist murderers. Why should a little eugenics disqualify a scientist?
4 posted on 01/30/2004 4:51:48 AM PST by Norman Conquest (We're all puppets. I'm just a puppet who can see the strings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gd124
His Nobel Prize work had nothing to do with his sentiments regarding either eugenics or the Nazi Party (which didn't exist until after he won the Prize). It's worth keeping in mind that Julius Wagner von Jauregg was born in 1857; he must have been pushing (or towing) 80 when he joined the Nazi Party, fully 20 years after his crucial 1917 work on malaria and ten years after finally getting recognized by the Prize. At the time he joined the Nazi Party already had a death grip on the academic and scientific establishments and it would have been difficult, perhaps impossible, for him to continue research or teaching or maybe even being mentioned in textbooks if he hadn't gotten on the good side of the Nazi Party. He died in 1940, at age 83, probably completely unaware of the magnitude of Nazi crimes.
5 posted on 01/30/2004 5:54:59 AM PST by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson