Skip to comments.
VANITY: The best way to keep America a sovereign free nation is to keep the Democrats out of power!
Free Republic
Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 1,261-1,271 next last
To: TruthNtegrity; Ophiucus
Please read post #53
201
posted on
01/29/2004 7:20:40 PM PST
by
Tempest
To: M Kehoe
If he doesn't vote.
Sitting out the election, and not exercising your right to vote is, IMO, being a lousy American.
202
posted on
01/29/2004 7:21:14 PM PST
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: onyx
Claims to reside here... like not being able to take the country out of a country boy, guess we can't take the DUH out of nanodik. Is that kind of vitriol really necessary? We're having a nice discussion here; people of differing opinions are being reasonably respectful. Then you come along with comments like these and incite a flamefest.
Perhaps you'd consider dialing the rhetoric back a notch? Thanks in advance.
To: yonif
But wouldn't a Democratic president be stopped by the GOP gridlock in Congress?That wouldn't stop them. They would just call on one of their appointed judges to legislate from the BENCH!
204
posted on
01/29/2004 7:21:23 PM PST
by
hobson
(Don't sweat the petty things. Don't pet the sweaty things.)
To: Jim Robinson
Thank you for posting this.
Though I don't agree with the President on all issues (who does?) I will NOT hand the reins of government over to the socialists!
Those who vote third-party or write-in as a "protest" of illegal immigration issues or spending issues are really saying it's OK to punish the American people with the likes of a Kerry or a Dean so the Republican party can be "sent a message".
What excuse will they give when there are terror-bombed cities, martial law, and the abolishment of personal property? "I didn't know it would be this bad"? "
It'll be way too late once the chains are fastened.
205
posted on
01/29/2004 7:21:50 PM PST
by
petuniasevan
(New Tagline Found! (S)teal (I)gnore (C)orrect spelling ?)
To: Jim Robinson
As you well know, Jim, we have a higher percentage of Freepers who are inclined to vote third party than exist in the general population.
As a result, we're going to see more conservative opposition to Bush expressed here at this forum than is representative of the nation.
There's nothing we can do or should do about that. Conservatives do not have to be Republicans.
However, if they want to prevent Democrats from running this country, they do have to support and vote for Republicans in state and national elections.
If not, they are wasting their vote, no matter how hard they whine that they're not.
No third party will ever win a national election until they've been successful consistently at the local or state level.
A victory for Bush is critical to the future of this country. Supreme Court justices serve for 30 years or more, and we're facing a bunch of upcoming vacancies.
This should be a no-brainer for any conservative. Perhaps it is. Perhaps the whiners post one way and vote another. I hope so.
To: NittanyLion
It does to me! I want to know if someone posting on this thread about our election in November is eligible to vote in our elections. What's wrong with that?
207
posted on
01/29/2004 7:22:07 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
To: Nanodik
And after all that, why would you want to give the Dems even more opportunity to push their socialism on us? Doesn't make any sense.
Vote the Dems out and keep them out. That's what has never been done.
208
posted on
01/29/2004 7:22:19 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
To: Jim Robinson
How close is this election in your opinion?
209
posted on
01/29/2004 7:22:22 PM PST
by
yonif
("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
To: Nanodik
Funny how the Dems somehow managed to push socialism as far as they have without all the things the RP is asking for. Why not, give them the 60 senators they need and I will look forward to the creative excuses they will come up with for not rolling back govt. As I see your point about the 60 senators, I guess the only explanation I can give is that our side doesn't play dirty tricks like the Dems do.
Our side doesn't use and abuse our national security secrets to score political points like the Dems as we found out in the leaked Select Intell Memo
Our side doesn't abuse the justice systems like the Dems do as we found out in the leaked JC Memo
Are you saying we should throw our principals out the window and fight dirty like the Democrats do?
210
posted on
01/29/2004 7:22:25 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: NittanyLion
I broke no rules and YOU should be far more than " ashamed ", for whinging about my post and ignoring the post I was replying to.
And WHAT would you call YOUR post to me, other than a personal attack,baiting, an invitation to a flame war,and a senseless diatribe ? :-)
To: Brad's Gramma
Come on, do better than name calling. Just because a group of us agree on something, we're sheep? If it was any other FReeper besides Jim Robinson who created this Vanity thread my "sheep" comment would be a non-issue.
To: *Jim_Rob list
213
posted on
01/29/2004 7:23:09 PM PST
by
petuniasevan
(New Tagline Found! (S)teal (I)gnore (C)orrect spelling ?)
To: ohioWfan
doesn't know diddly squat about the President's efforts to get conservatives in the judiciary Efforts don't pass SCOTUS decisions. Based upon his inability to force through a latino conservative (by press accounts) to a federal appellate position, what makes you think he will provide us with the next Rehnquist to the SC? I have plenty of evidence the guy will cave to the Dems to get "something" passed. Remember the edumacation bill that was going to have school choice as a center piece? No school choice, but plenty of money for the DOE to toss around and penned by Kennedy no less! What are you guys going to do when he puts forth a middle of the road, swing vote to the Supreme Court? Claim it was the fact that he did not have 60 Rep senators to back him up?
214
posted on
01/29/2004 7:23:33 PM PST
by
Nanodik
(Bush! The next best thing to a real "conservative")
To: PhiKapMom
215
posted on
01/29/2004 7:23:40 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Have you prayed to President Bush today?)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Sorry Jim, you can convince the flock of sheep here to vote for Bush. But my vote's going to the Constitution Party. I find it hilarious that you, claiming great principles, feel the need to demean those of us who have different opinions than yours as sheep.
And since you're insisting that something is wrong with us unless we agree with YOU, what the HELL does that make you, other than a lockstepper?
216
posted on
01/29/2004 7:24:12 PM PST
by
Howlin
(http://www.icomm.ca/dragon/image/hbook3.gif)
To: ohioWfan
bump!
Thanks, ohio!
217
posted on
01/29/2004 7:24:41 PM PST
by
mamaduck
(I follow a New Age Guru . . . from 2000 years ago.)
To: PhiKapMom
It does to me! I want to know if someone posting on this thread about our election in November is eligible to vote in our elections. What's wrong with that? It neither supports nor invalidates the arguments he's made. Quite frankly, it makes absolutely no difference whatsoever. Hence the reason I asked whether his comments are any more or less valid based on his citizenship (the answer is no, just like you and I can hold strong opinions about the French while sitting here in the Good Ole US of A).
To: Jim Robinson
bump
To: The Shootist
I'll go for that. The sooner the better. But, in the meantime, we need to do all we can to keep the Demos out. It's important to keep majority power out of Democrat hands
220
posted on
01/29/2004 7:25:16 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 1,261-1,271 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson