Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Centuries-Old Murals Revealed (Discovered) In Mission Dolores (San Francisco)
SF Chronicle ^ | 1-29-2004 | Carl Nolte

Posted on 01/29/2004 3:58:09 PM PST by blam

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:38 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Two young men, one an artist, the other an archaeologist, crawled over the ancient redwood beams of San Francisco's Mission Dolores earlier this month, opened a trap door, lowered an electric light into a space behind the main altar -- and stared into the 18th century.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: art; artifacts; centuries; church; dolores; godsgravesglyphs; mission; murals; old
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Varda
English of course in their hatred for all things Spanish and Catholic

The Brits also have a very strong doctrine of "Yanks were always bad to the red-indians".  It distorts much they write in science, news, history, literature, etc.

21 posted on 01/30/2004 5:11:37 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
When I was in college, I had to read a number of English reports and papers about various subjects including the New World. They really don't have the idea of separating their personal philosophies/advocacy's from their professional work. It made for really irritating reading after a while.
22 posted on 01/30/2004 5:42:11 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam
At what site are the images available for viewing? The Chronicle? elsewhere?
23 posted on 01/30/2004 5:53:29 AM PST by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
BUMP
24 posted on 01/30/2004 6:03:34 AM PST by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
I was on my way to court and didn't have time to look for a better link - really shouldn't have taken the time I did take to look for the one image I found but was still drinking my coffee trying to clear the cobwebs.

Just got back, won my motion, am now going to work on a settlement demand - cha-ching! - walking on air.

It's clear to me that the artists worked from common images that they had already seen around the mission. In the far-off passages of my memory, under the cobwebs, the image which is stirring is from a travelling show of Spanish sacred architecture from Peru that I saw at the Delgado Art Museum in New Orleans several decades ago.

In other words, they didn't create the image, they reproduced it. Which is how church paintings and sculptures work, in general, everybody copies something they've already seen, but in their own way.
25 posted on 01/30/2004 9:43:38 AM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
The party line may have changed

I have no idea what "party line" you're talking about, but I don't think it's germane to the subject at hand. I do agree that the images appear to be motivated by the wish to express religious beliefs.

26 posted on 01/30/2004 9:57:04 AM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
I have no idea what "party line" you're talking about, but I don't think it's germane to the subject at hand. 

It's a shorthand for the 'academic standards' that spotlight (IMHO) a well deserved connotation of virtual soviet style political control.  History and Archeology are alive and changing because of evolving contemporary filters that open vistas to some areas of a new find, and close off others.

But maybe I'm rambling on about stuff you already know about.    You probably agree with me that the Mission Dolores Mural article, like all such reports, has to be read with an understanding of which academic bias exists.  In this case, the article seems to fall into the old 'native Americans were slaves' doctrine.  It's wrong (again IMHO) to suggest that the drawings were forced and not, as you (and I) believe, "motivated by the wish to express religious beliefs."

27 posted on 01/30/2004 12:01:58 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
It may well be that the reference to slavery was gratuitous. I don't know much about California Indians, recall from a book titled "Ishi" that they were basically wiped out.
http://www.ucsf.edu/about_ucsf/history_philosophy/ishi.html
28 posted on 01/30/2004 12:53:32 PM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer
ping
29 posted on 01/30/2004 2:12:06 PM PST by msdrby (US Veterans: All give some, but some give all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue; Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona; NYer; Salvation; Litany
ping
30 posted on 01/30/2004 2:47:10 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Political factions will imply that indigenous people were ‘basically wiped out’ when they justify grants for reparations, create new government agencies, increase agency payrolls, etc.. When they want to receive benefits or increase representation, then Census numbers (http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=04000US06&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_DP1&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U) showing about a million living in California alone are used. That doesn’t even count additional millions of people who are unaware that they may be also descended from the original tribes.

Many died when native and western cultures mixed, but most died from diseases (like Ishi) from ‘friends’. Once immunities were developed, native populations have apparently increased to levels higher than had been before first contact.

31 posted on 01/30/2004 3:47:30 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
bump
32 posted on 01/30/2004 5:17:35 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: blam
" painted in red, black and yellow by Native Americans in 1791"

And just how the hell does anyone know WHO painted the figures? What are they signed "Jose Blanketass" or something?

33 posted on 01/30/2004 5:38:26 PM PST by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Of course, I know that the Indians in San Francisco were not Aztecs. (That made me laugh.) However, we both know that no culture lives in isolation. Ideas and influence flow freely, often absorbing into one another. That's why it struck me that there MIGHT be a correlation here.

(This definition isn't for you, just thought I'd insert it here ... "Correlation: capacity of being converted into, or of giving place to, one another, under certain conditions.")

BTW, congratulations on your court case. Hope you make lots of money. ;)
34 posted on 01/31/2004 12:58:13 AM PST by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
It would be interesting to study whether Native American culture somehow influenced the Spaniards and Portuguese in Latin America.

I do know that North American culture was influenced by Native Americans. Well, we all do, of course. We all know about Squanto, for example. And many of us know about how our Constitution was in part influenced by the Five Civilized Tribes.

For example, the word "caucus" is Algonquian in derivation.

Sorry if I am laying it on too thick, I am presently working on the genealogy of my Chippewa great-grandmother. I've got a stack of photos of relatives with strong Indian features, but no names on the back, and a stack of documents from the National Archives about ancestors who went to the Carlisle Indian School and the Fort Totten Indian School.

According to family history, around World War I, the US government was giving land to my family but my great grandfather, who was of German heritage, did not want anybody to know that he was married to a "squaw."

I don't think she was better than anybody else, and I don't think she was worse than anybody else. She had a story to tell, and I mean to find it out and tell it. The family was Catholic, perhaps because they intermarried with French Canadians, perhaps because the Indian School in Fort Totten was run by nuns. I know she was devout because she was alive until I was grown, but I never thought to ask her about her past while she was alive, and now she's gone forever.
35 posted on 01/31/2004 1:29:47 AM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Blind said, anyone can see them"....WHAT???
36 posted on 01/31/2004 6:36:28 PM PST by Henchman (I Hench, therefore I am!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
" but I never thought to ask her about her past while she was alive, and now she's gone forever."

I think that happens to us all. My grandfather spend a year in prison during the 20's for making 'moonshine' during prohibition. I should have talked with him about that. His name was Otis Strength, my mom's father.

37 posted on 01/31/2004 8:29:34 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson