Skip to comments.
Ashcroft thinks Patriot Act will stand
Mercury News ^
| 1/29/04
| Curt Anderson - AP
Posted on 01/29/2004 11:16:53 AM PST by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:49:30 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration issued a veto threat Thursday against legislation introduced in Congress that would scale back key parts of the anti-terrorism Patriot Act.
In a letter to Senate leaders, Attorney General John Ashcroft said the changes contemplated by the Security and Freedom Ensured Act, or SAFE, would "undermine our ongoing campaign to detect and prevent catastrophic terrorist attacks."
(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ashcroft; patriotact; safeact; sneakandpeek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: azhenfud
If the bill reaches President Bush's desk in its current form, Ashcroft said, "the president's senior advisers will recommend that it be vetoed."It's becoming quite evident that:
A)the President's 'advisors' could give a dern less about the Constitution or the citizens of the respective states if it gets in the way of their power trip and
B)they're no more conservative than the man they're 'advising'
21
posted on
01/29/2004 1:48:42 PM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice.)
To: freeeee
Yep, so very similar to the NFA-34 act, the belief that we need a "license" in order to drive, the Fed. income tax, the death tax........
Incremental erosion of liberty, how to destroy a republic!
22
posted on
01/29/2004 1:51:08 PM PST
by
Richard-SIA
(Nuke the U.N!)
To: Recovering_Democrat
The actual application of the act is irrelevant -- just because someone has a loaded weapon pointed at your head "but hasn't fired YET" is no reason to feel at ease.
The PA, pure and simple, is a whittling away of constitutional protections...the FBI being allowed to have a "free look" into your home without your knowledge and without a warrant is just one example.
The PA is a governmental power grab. As another poster mentioned, our borders are like Swiss cheese yet the Depts of Homeland Security and Justice feel no need to address that. That in itself gives the lie to the motivation behind the PA.
23
posted on
01/29/2004 1:55:04 PM PST
by
LN2Campy
To: Recovering_Democrat
the war against terror is won An essential condition. Name the theoretical conditions for a declared victory in the WoT.
I submit that there are none. The WoT is the typical 'perpetual war' described in '1984': Low intensity conflict at home, shifting opponents, infiltrators and sabateurs under every stone. It's got it all.
Measures within the PA deemed appropriate for continued law enforcement and national security are kept
The PA is going to expire, but they're going to keep parts???
You have an odd notion of 'expire'.
24
posted on
01/29/2004 1:55:30 PM PST
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
To: billbears
I'm weighing closely which would be better; 1) an unimpeded administration whose every action is to enlarge government beyond its necessary measure and to destroy an entire segment of society, or 2) a political quagmire where the status is quo, where politicians can do nothing but quibble, and where absolutely nothing of significance gets done.
25
posted on
01/29/2004 1:57:10 PM PST
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: freeeee
Since I haven't the time or inclination to currently address the concerns raised, I refer the right honorable FREEPer to the aforementioned threads. :)
26
posted on
01/29/2004 2:02:02 PM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: LN2Campy
All of this has been previously addressed. See my post #26.
27
posted on
01/29/2004 2:02:52 PM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: Recovering_Democrat
Do you have a link?
28
posted on
01/29/2004 2:04:29 PM PST
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
To: george wythe
According to Ashcroft, you were right the first time
29
posted on
01/29/2004 2:33:16 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(It is always tempting to impute unlikely virtues to the cute)
To: george wythe
If the Patriot Act was meant to "prevent catastrophic terrorist attacks," then why is the Patriot Act used to investigate and prosecute strip joint owners? For the same reason why RICO meant to fight organised crime is being used agaist pro-life activists.
"People who are willing to give up freedom for the sake of short term security, deserve neither freedom nor security." -Benjamin Franklin
30
posted on
01/29/2004 5:33:00 PM PST
by
A. Pole
(pay no attention to the man behind the curtain , the hand of free market must be invisible)
To: Richard-SIA
It is far more devastating to the foundations of America than the murder of a few thousand citizens and the destruction of a few buildings. Few more buildings, few thousand more deaths and freedom is gone.
31
posted on
01/29/2004 5:35:35 PM PST
by
A. Pole
(pay no attention to the man behind the curtain , the hand of free market must be invisible)
To: george wythe
Touching a woman's breast might be immoral, even sinful, but it's not a terrorist activity So protesting abortion does not equal mafia activity (RICO).
32
posted on
01/29/2004 5:37:58 PM PST
by
A. Pole
(pay no attention to the man behind the curtain , the hand of free market must be invisible)
To: A. Pole
>Few more buildings, few thousand more deaths and freedom is gone.True freedom went down for the count when property and income taxes became accepted facts of life. It's been downhill ever since. But your point is valid. That would be the final nails in the coffin.
33
posted on
01/29/2004 5:59:17 PM PST
by
u-89
(war is peace, slavery is freedom, shut up and salute)
To: A. Pole
....at which point the terrorist will have won!
34
posted on
01/29/2004 6:53:00 PM PST
by
Richard-SIA
(Nuke the U.N!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson