Skip to comments.
IRAQ MINISTER SAYS SADDAM WMD CAREFULLY HIDDEN
Reuters ^
| 1/29/04
Posted on 01/29/2004 6:40:30 AM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 321-336 next last
To: Dave S
The parcelling out theory is nothing but BS. You haven't a clue as to whether or not it's BS.
81
posted on
01/29/2004 7:22:38 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: thinktwice
The workers on the Taj Mahal had their hands cut off after their work was finished.
82
posted on
01/29/2004 7:23:13 AM PST
by
sarasota
To: Dog
Both are correct. IMO.
To: dogbyte12
We have over a hundred thousand boots on the ground,
This reminded me of a local incident where a guy liked to keep snakes in his trailer and a cobra escaped in the neighborhood. The whole area was combing looking for this snake. To me, it seemed incredible they couldn't find it. I then drove over to the "neighborhood" which bordered on extremely dense woods more akin to jungle. After seeing this I realized - they ain't ever gonna find this snake! And they never did. I think it's the same thing with trying to find thimble-fulls of bio agents in desert the size of California.
To: areafiftyone
Folks we are in the economic fight for our survival. Murdering a few thousand people with WMD's is child's play compared to the fallout of an energy crisis. Let's keep our eye on the ball and accept the political posturing as a means to an end.
To: dogbyte12
If you genuinely believe that of the hundreds of people who would be required to work on a WMD program, all of them are either dead, or not motivated by a multimillion dollar payoff, I think you are wrong. A lot of them HAVE come forward. A lot of the programs HAVE been identified and reported on. It's just the actual supplies we're looking for now. And as I said, even the "large stockpile" in question is quite small in terms of square footage.
86
posted on
01/29/2004 7:24:28 AM PST
by
wizardoz
("Crikey! I've lost my mojo!")
To: Coop
That's not accurate. We've located many facilities and personnel involved with the WMD programs. We located facilities and personnel involved in WMD programs that were active?
I thought Dr. Kay's testimony was that the scientists were taking the money for the programs, but not actually making any weapons. And that all the Generals all thought some other General actually had the weapons, but none actually did. Maybe I missed something.
To: HankReardon
Also, we're not going to find "stock piles" of chemical weapons laying around! From my limited understanding, the chemicals have to be mixed right before firing. So, the idea of us stumbling across some war heads fully loaded is a misconception -- one you'd think the Dem candidates would be aware of if they were being truthful.
88
posted on
01/29/2004 7:25:12 AM PST
by
reegs
To: plain talk
Genghis Khan (saw this on the History Channel last week)
When he died, a group of 50 soldiers and many maids made the trek into the steppes, killing anyone they came across. After they buried Attila, then 50 soldiers killed those soldiers and maids and those 50 soldiers were killed...
Madmen do not care about life.
No one has ever been able to find the burial tombs/sites of the Khans. They did a good job of hiding them.
89
posted on
01/29/2004 7:26:08 AM PST
by
eyespysomething
(Another American optimist!)
To: eyespysomething
Baathist Broadcasting Company
90
posted on
01/29/2004 7:26:15 AM PST
by
GigaDittos
(Bumper sticker: "Vote Democrat, it's easier than getting a job.")
To: areafiftyone
Anyone anywhere near to the hiding of saddam's weapons would be very dead. You can bet on that.
91
posted on
01/29/2004 7:26:17 AM PST
by
dc-zoo
To: petercooper
While he had months and months and years to hide them, where was our intelligence? We should have been able to track em down.
As Kay said, this is a collosal failure on the part of US Intelligence, primarily the CIA. Many of these failures have taken place under George Tenet.
Why GW Bush won't sack Tenet is something I really fail to understand. The guy has not been working for Bush and it shows.
The Bush Administrations biggest mistakes during these years has been the failure to clean house in the State Department, Intelligence apparatus and the Joint Chiefs. The failure to aggressively use Spec. Ops, the failure of having US diplomats vocally opposing the President's initiatives and the failure of the intelligence community are, right now, severely hurting this President. I hope he understands that.
92
posted on
01/29/2004 7:27:07 AM PST
by
Solson
(Our work is the presentation of our capabilities. - Von Goethe)
To: Dave S
Very dangerous to use WMD's. We are winning this war, the people trained to properly disperse chemical or biological weapons are probably gone. Besides, the low level insurgients that are left would not have been told where the WMD's have been taken, hidden or whatever.
To: hopespringseternal
On the other hand, if he didn't have them why didn't he cooperate fully to show that? He could have kept his palaces and all. So he's a fool or didn't know that he didn't have any.
94
posted on
01/29/2004 7:29:45 AM PST
by
GigaDittos
(Bumper sticker: "Vote Democrat, it's easier than getting a job.")
To: reegs
From my limited understanding, the chemicals have to be mixed right before firing. I heard that too but I cannot remember which chemical. Mustard?
95
posted on
01/29/2004 7:30:49 AM PST
by
hobson
(If you don't like the news, go out and make some.)
To: HankReardon
Heavy water. It is used to moderate a nuclear reaction the same way that the US scientists used carbon bricks in Chicago. The German scientists believed that it was the only way to control a reaction so once their source was lost the project was basicly stopped.
96
posted on
01/29/2004 7:31:15 AM PST
by
Kadric
To: dogbyte12
I am in the no WMD camp. Face it. A janitor in a WMD facility could become a very wealthy man right now by telling us where the stuff was buried. Some scientist who drank too much, could have told his wife where they are. To have a very active program, there are way too many people who know things. One person would have blabbed right now, either out of greed, out of spite, or out of fear of a very mean looking CIA field agent. It would have happened by now unless only a few dozen people knew where stuff was buried, and then they were almost all murderedI agree with all of this.
To: dogbyte12
You are exactly right.
If there are huge piles of WMDs hidden somewhere, there are numerous people out there who know about them and at least one of those people would find it worth the reward (either money or a free pass out of prison) to tell. It hasn't happened because the WMD stockpiles aren't there, pure and simple. Does anybody really believe these scumbags are so honorable and loyal that they'll rot in prison or rat holes rather than give it up?
98
posted on
01/29/2004 7:32:25 AM PST
by
kegler4
To: Coop
What evidence do you have other than in your mind?
99
posted on
01/29/2004 7:32:27 AM PST
by
Dave S
To: Atlantic Friend
No, the question of whether there ever was any WMD's in Iraq is NOT still hanging.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 321-336 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson