Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Is Said to Seek More Money for Arts [$15 million to $20 million for NEA]
New York Times ^ | January 29, 2004 | ROBERT PEAR

Posted on 01/28/2004 8:29:35 PM PST by yonif

WASHINGTON, Jan. 28 — President Bush will seek a big increase in the budget of the National Endowment for the Arts, the largest single source of support for the arts in the United States, administration officials said on Wednesday.

The proposal is part of a turnaround for the agency, which was once fighting for its life, attacked by some Republicans as a threat to the nation's moral standards.

Laura Bush plans to announce the request on Thursday, in remarks intended to show the administration's commitment to the arts, aides said.

Administration officials, including White House budget experts, said that Mr. Bush would propose an increase of $15 million to $20 million for the coming fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1. That would be the largest rise in two decades and far more than the most recent increases, about $500,000 for 2003 and $5 million for this year.

The agency has a budget of $121 million this year, 31 percent lower than its peak of $176 million in 1992. After Republicans gained control of Congress in 1995, they cut the agency's budget to slightly less than $100 million, and the budget was essentially flat for five years.

In an e-mail message inviting arts advocates to a news briefing with Mrs. Bush, Dana Gioia, the poet who is chairman of the endowment, says, "You will be present for an important day in N.E.A. history."

Mr. Gioia (pronounced JOY-uh) has tried to move beyond the culture wars that swirled around the agency for years. He has nurtured support among influential members of Congress, including conservative Republicans like Representatives Charles H. Taylor and Sue Myrick of North Carolina. He has held workshops around the country to explain how local arts organizations can apply for assistance.

Public support for the arts was hotly debated in the 1990's. Conservatives complained that the agency was financing obscene or sacrilegious works by artists like Robert Mapplethorpe and Andres Serrano. Former Senator Jesse Helms, Republican of North Carolina, repeatedly tried to eliminate the agency.

Some new money sought by Mr. Bush would expand initiatives with broad bipartisan support, like performances of Shakespeare's plays and "Jazz Masters" concert tours.

Mrs. Bush also plans to introduce a new initiative, "American Masterpieces: Three Centuries of Artistic Genius." This would combine art presentations — from painting and literature to music and dance — with education programs. The program would give large numbers of students around the country a chance to see exhibitions and performances.

New York receives a large share of the endowment's grants. But under federal law, the agency also gives priority to projects that cater to "underserved populations," including members of minority groups in urban neighborhoods with high poverty rates.

The president's proposal faces an uncertain future at a time of large budget deficits.

Melissa Schwartz, a spokeswoman for the Association of Performing Arts Presenters, an advocacy group, said, "We'll be fighting tooth and nail for the increase."

Some conservatives, like Representative Tom Tancredo, Republican of Colorado, vowed to oppose the increase. Even without support from the government, he said, "art would thrive in America."

Representative Louise M. Slaughter, a New York Democrat who is co-chairwoman of the Congressional Arts Caucus, said she was delighted to learn of Mr. Bush's proposal.

"There's nothing in the world that helps economic development more than arts programs," Ms. Slaughter said. "It was foolish for Congress to choke them and starve them. We should cherish the people who can tell us who we are, where we came from and where we hope to go."

Mr. Tancredo expressed dismay. "We are looking at record deficit and potential cuts in all kinds of programs," he said. "How can I tell constituents that I'll take money away from them to pay for somebody else's idea of good art? I have no more right to do that than to finance somebody else's ideas about religion."

The agency has long had support from some Republicans, like Representatives Christopher Shays of Connecticut and Jim Leach of Iowa.

"Government involvement is designed to take the arts from the grand citadel of the privileged and bring them to the public at large," Mr. Leach said. "This democratization of the arts ennobles the American experience."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; laurabush; nea; notconservatism; presidentbush; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,001-1,004 next last
To: Diddle E. Squat
C'mon, think it through. Like it or not, his reelection may very well be decided by the moderate female vote in states like PA. This increase is about taking away one of the daggers the Dems always wield each election, the mantra that the GOP is going to kill this program and that program. Killing the arts is one of the issues they always throw out, and like it or not, it is popular with many moderates, esp. Northeast female moderates(think Philly suburbs), CA, FL, etc.

Utter nonsense. I've lived in the Philly suburbs, and the NEA just doesn't resonate outside of the tiny Mainline corridor.

So for what amounts to peanuts compared to the actual budget, he defuses that arguments, showing that he is 'safe' and not 'extreme'. We may need a swing of only 5-10,000 votes may be the deciding margin in as many as a dozen states, just like in 2000.

Bush will destroy any democrat in the field. It's disingenuous to suggest this issue will swing any voters, or even to suggest it'll be necessary come November.

341 posted on 01/29/2004 4:47:49 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: conspiratoristo
It is time to turn the tables on the Bush administration.
Like was said before but kinda different.

"It's time for U.S., the conservative republicans to say:
"I double dog dare ya, President Bush, to not rescind and retract your Alien Amnesty. We can do anything, and We will put your tail between your legs and kick you out of the White House, because We hate the alternative so much.

Lets remember it won't be our fault if Bush loses. It will be Bush's fault. Because:

It is not the people - that need to represent the will of the President.
It is the President - that needs to represent the will of the people.
342 posted on 01/29/2004 4:48:27 AM PST by TomasUSMC (from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
You don't know Philly suburban moderate females well, do ya?

If you think this resonates with them, neither do you.

343 posted on 01/29/2004 4:50:54 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Since the budget is essentially flat in all non-defense and security areas, I imagine that is what is was done.

LOL! What numbers are YOU looking at? Apparently not the same as the rest of us...

344 posted on 01/29/2004 4:52:33 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: yonif
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents ... " BUMP.
345 posted on 01/29/2004 4:52:37 AM PST by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OWK
This site is absolutely unreal. Anymore I come to these threads for little more than the humor derived from watching "conservatives" contort themselves in support of anything and everything this administration proposes. These people have no shame.
346 posted on 01/29/2004 4:54:11 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
It is most peculiar...

There's no way the defenders of this leftist tripe can actually believe their own propaganda...

No way.

347 posted on 01/29/2004 4:56:02 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: OWK
Er, how about actually discussing this instead of coming up with an insult? I think you have just proved my point.
348 posted on 01/29/2004 4:56:06 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
The destruction of the Bush presidency is a self destruction. It is not our duty to be loyal to a President it is the duty of a President to be loyal to us. He represents US, not vice versa. He can't beat Kerry now because Millions of US have decided not to vote for him unless he turns around and represents US. Bush is committing suicide.
349 posted on 01/29/2004 4:56:37 AM PST by TomasUSMC (from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Please see my response to OWK. It applies to your post, too.
350 posted on 01/29/2004 4:57:04 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
It is not our duty to be loyal to a President it is the duty of a President to be loyal to us. He represents US, not vice versa.

A critical distinction that will be lost on the majority of posters present on this thread.

351 posted on 01/29/2004 5:01:07 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: livius
De facto amnesty v. de jure amnesty? Not much difference, actually. If you want your kind of art to replace the Vagina Monologues then go donate to your local arts society. Don't force me at the pain of imprisonment to pay for your genorosity.
352 posted on 01/29/2004 5:03:24 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: livius
You want discussion?

Here's some discussion.

The current president is a bigger socialist than Clinton was.

He spends OUR money (money we don't even have, but must enslave our children to repay) like a drunken sailor.

He's left of center on EVERY issue in front of him.

And when conservatives voice a complaint, a virtual army of apologists like yourself scurry out of the wordwork to tell them how they just don't understand how "necessary" it all is.

Well it isn't necessary.

It's wrong... and it will be the final nail in the coffin of the republic.

But so long as the idiot destroying the republic has an "R" on his team jersey.. you think that's just swell...

That makes you part of the problem in my book.

You're an advocate of socialism.

An enemy of me and mine.

353 posted on 01/29/2004 5:04:19 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
This will buy Bush Zero Votes. What was the purpose, anyone, Beuller, Beuller?
354 posted on 01/29/2004 5:05:05 AM PST by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri
Can someone please tell me, WTF is Bush doing? I thought we had a fiscal conservative in there...he hasn't been that from day 1. This act is starting to get really tired.

The medicare thing was bad enough and immigration amnesty, but now THIS!!??
355 posted on 01/29/2004 5:05:29 AM PST by Nagilum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
This will buy Bush Zero Votes.

If it bought him 10 million votes.. it would STILL be wrong.

356 posted on 01/29/2004 5:06:35 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: livius
Er, how about actually discussing this instead of coming up with an insult? I think you have just proved my point.

How did OWK just "prove your point?"
357 posted on 01/29/2004 5:12:26 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
You also need to forget that none of us have ever paid for the deficits of any administration, we work and pay our taxes, and the last time I looked my taxes are much lower than the were on January 19th, 2001

Your ignorance of economics is duly noted.

358 posted on 01/29/2004 5:15:19 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
A further thought: would it not be best, if the upwelling of dissent about the President's recent liberal leanings were given free rein, here? I try not to over or underestimate FR's influence, but surely if the message went out that such a large website, which had been previously supportive, was now united in dismay, that would add weight to the other messages of dissatisfaction GWB must be receiving. Let's face it nopardons, unless the President stops burning his base the election's going to be a nailbiting cliffhanger, and the debates here on FR won't be any picnic either.
359 posted on 01/29/2004 5:15:37 AM PST by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
I was being sarcastic. I and others have been accused of being single issue voters and this is why we oppose GWB. I am not and I totally agree with your list and the fact that GWB needs to wake up a smell the coffee. Hopefully he will.
360 posted on 01/29/2004 5:16:47 AM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,001-1,004 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson