[RS]

"...we also discussed the possibility that a court might refuse to authorize release based on constitutional concerns."

Is she also the resident expert on what a court MIGHT do ?

If she SUSPECTS that something MIGHT happen is he obligated by any law or ethics to agree with or act upon it ?

She says they discussed it... but she dosen't say that they came to any sort of conclusion, or even if, besides simply considering it, in her opinion he SHOULD ask a court to decide.

Is he supposed to include all of her speculations in his report, or simply as she says, that they BOTH AGREED on what he asked her about, and what she is the expert on ?

"Now tell my why is she "disappointed in him personally and professionally"???????? "

You want me to speculate again ?

[Cubs Fan]

"Now tell my why is she "disappointed in him personally and professionally"???????? "

--You want me to speculate again ?---

You can answer any time now (I hope you'll do better than she's part of a vast right wing conspiracy to mess up your liberal states attorney friend)

[Cubs Fan]

--Is she also the resident expert on what a court MIGHT do ? yada yada---

The AG is clearly saying that just because she knows of no specific exemptions for releasing plea bargain documents in the sunshine law THAT THAT DOES NOT MEAN ITS OKAY TO JUST GO AHEAD AND RELEASE THEM.

Like the AG said the SA deliberately omitted part of her opinion in order to make it look as if she backed up his decision entirely. She of course did not, and was angry at him for trying to make it look like she did (again DUH!!!!!).

FACT:He's a liar and you're his OJ juror apologist, tell me is it fun doing the liberals dirty work for them?