Replies

"Now tell my why is she "disappointed in him personally and professionally"???????? "

--You want me to speculate again ?---

You can answer any time now (I hope you'll do better than she's part of a vast right wing conspiracy to mess up your liberal states attorney friend)

Her last paragraph -

"Both your file memorandum and e-mail emphasize that you did not tell me who the defendant was in this situation. However, that should not and cannot matter."

Why is this even here ? ( Hint - I didn't know who it was about, don't get me involved )

"Over the years, I have had many conversations with assistant state attorneys about pressing public records issues These conversations have been candid and in my view have helped the state to resolve public records issues and focus on the upcoming trial,..."

Duh - that's WHY he called you - and you BOTH AGREED on the public records issue.

"In this case. however, it seems to me that the purpose in contacting me about this issue may not have been to obtain impartial advice on an open government issue, but rather to use a part of our conversation to justify your office's decision that the documents should be released."

EXACTLY CORRECT - He did NOT call for advice on an open governmental issue - he asked for specific information in a facet that she is the expert on, and they BOTH AGREED.

"This is disappointing to me personally and professionally."

Sorry that you are disappointed both personally and professionally that he did value your suggestions on things which you are not the known expert on enough to act on them.