To: PAR35
OK - I'll spoon feed it for you - (emphasis mine )
"This request seeks ALL public records in the custody of the State Attorney's Office ("SAO") for the County of Palm Beach, or in the custody of any individual working for said office, which name or IN ANY WAY REFERENCE Rush Limbaugh, and which cover the period of January 1, 2000 to present."
Please, I provide links where I can unlike others here, read them first, then I welcome your impressions.
Now there seems to be some debate over what is public information - Landmark even threatened to sue 2 days later if they did not like the SAO's definition, but you can't say that Black did not know that everything that was public information was coming out - he even specifically wanted to see it.
There are plenty of threads already on just what "public information" is or should be if you need to get up to speed on it.
42 posted on
01/28/2004 6:12:32 PM PST by
RS
(Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
To: RS
read them first, I do read them, but in context. The "any records" in the paragraph you quoted is limited and qualified by the earlier paragraph I quoted above, limiting it to "any records of his staff's communications with the media."
So far, you have been unable to support your allegation that the State's Attorney notified the Defendant't attorney of the request by the media.
I am not debating with you what is public information under Florida law - the information disclosed may or may not be covered. I have no opinion on that, and I have no need to "get up to speed on it". I am only questioning one factual allegation made by you.
57 posted on
01/28/2004 7:55:11 PM PST by
PAR35
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson