Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RS
read them first,

I do read them, but in context. The "any records" in the paragraph you quoted is limited and qualified by the earlier paragraph I quoted above, limiting it to "any records of his staff's communications with the media."

So far, you have been unable to support your allegation that the State's Attorney notified the Defendant't attorney of the request by the media.

I am not debating with you what is public information under Florida law - the information disclosed may or may not be covered. I have no opinion on that, and I have no need to "get up to speed on it". I am only questioning one factual allegation made by you.

57 posted on 01/28/2004 7:55:11 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35
"I do read them, but in context."

Perhaps you need to read them in reality - to state that the request is limited by a phrase that NEVER appears in it is simply absurd.

There is no mention of "any records of his staff's communications with the media." -
( in fact the shortend phrase "any records" does not even appear )

http://www.landmarklegal.org/latest_developments.cfm?webpage_id=564

Although there IS -

"Landmark also seeks any and all internal SAO communications and records that are not exempt from disclosure."
64 posted on 01/28/2004 8:46:46 PM PST by RS (Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson