To: RS
found it for you - No, you didn't.
Landmark was looking for correspondence between the media and the State's attorneys office, not not correspondence in furtherence of settlement between the attorneys involved. Two completely different animals.
A conservative nonprofit law firm filed a request Thursday with Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krischer seeking any records of his staff's communications with the media relating to his office's investigation into Rush Limbaugh's prescription drug use.
40 posted on
01/28/2004 5:53:52 PM PST by
PAR35
To: PAR35
OK - I'll spoon feed it for you - (emphasis mine )
"This request seeks ALL public records in the custody of the State Attorney's Office ("SAO") for the County of Palm Beach, or in the custody of any individual working for said office, which name or IN ANY WAY REFERENCE Rush Limbaugh, and which cover the period of January 1, 2000 to present."
Please, I provide links where I can unlike others here, read them first, then I welcome your impressions.
Now there seems to be some debate over what is public information - Landmark even threatened to sue 2 days later if they did not like the SAO's definition, but you can't say that Black did not know that everything that was public information was coming out - he even specifically wanted to see it.
There are plenty of threads already on just what "public information" is or should be if you need to get up to speed on it.
42 posted on
01/28/2004 6:12:32 PM PST by
RS
(Just because they're out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson