Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zot!! 9 Reasons Conservatives Should Vote For Bush
Photo ^ | 1-28-04

Posted on 01/28/2004 11:17:09 AM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan

Edited on 01/28/2004 11:24:51 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

The nine candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination line up for a debate in Detroit. From left: the Rev. Al Sharpton; U.S. Rep. Richard Gephardt, Mo., retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark; Sen. Joe Lieberman, Conn.; Sen. John Edwards, N.C.; U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Ohio; former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun; and Sen. John Kerry, Mass


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10acrebutt; albatross; bush; conservatism; drownedincoolaid; election2004; jaroftrollsouls; topten; trollsinmyshorts; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-249 next last
To: DMCA
Normal FR(BushBot) response to anything negative about Bush.
1: Ignore what user has posted.
2: Insult User
3: Point out signup date:
4: Refuse to debate.
5: Ping others to harass user.
6: Still refuse to answer questions raised by poster.

Care to address post #6? It's a pretty thorough answer to the hyperbole contained in the original "article".

61 posted on 01/28/2004 11:33:08 AM PST by VRWCmember (Dick Gephardt is a <a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure </a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Ah...someone who knows how to debate (post #6)without invective. Cool. Nice job. Very smart.
62 posted on 01/28/2004 11:33:22 AM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I guess I ought to listen to someone whose screen name is the same as that of a defunct porn magazine.

really? I've had my name for 40 years and until now didn't know there was a Porn mag with the same name. It took you to enlighten me on that tier of porn mags below Penthouse and Playboy. Are there others you read...

63 posted on 01/28/2004 11:33:26 AM PST by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

64 posted on 01/28/2004 11:33:30 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Can also add to this list under Second Amendment

Signed the 2004 Omnibus Budget 1/26/2004 that required background check information be destroyed within 24 hours of the completion of the check.
65 posted on 01/28/2004 11:33:44 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
I support the Constitution Party, but this list is composed almost entirely of domestic issues. And it doesn't consider how bad a democrat might be.

Except for maybe Lieberman, all of the potential democrat candidates would be miserable dangerous failures on all international issues. And none of the democrat candidates would be any better than Bush on domestic issues - and would be much worse in regards to the appointment of Federal judges.

I will vote for the CP if it doesn't help the DEMs, but I'm afraid that its more important to cast an anti-DEM vote.
66 posted on 01/28/2004 11:34:15 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Care to address post #6?

Psssst.... He can't. He's not here.

67 posted on 01/28/2004 11:34:32 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
And some of the reasons why we should vote to re-elect President Bush are:

Bush won't hand over U.S. sovereignty to the U.N. like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush will defend America rather than surrendering to the French, et al, like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush won't sign onto America killers like Kyoto or the so-called world court, world government, etc., like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush is pro-life, pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-America, pro-God and will NOT appoint liberal activist judges like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

If you are at all interested in stopping the Marxist liberal take-over of America, then here's the place to draw the line.
68 posted on 01/28/2004 11:34:38 AM PST by Jim Robinson (I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Ann Coulter is voting for George W. Bush, not one of your unelectable candidates from what ever fringe group you hail from. Got it Noobee?
69 posted on 01/28/2004 11:34:39 AM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
From the photo, they look like variations on the same theme. Cloned!
70 posted on 01/28/2004 11:34:49 AM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winston Smith Jr.
Churchill once said that appeasement, while not actually treason, often has the same result....similarly, A VOTE FOR THE CONSTITUTION PARTY, or a non vote, IS A VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE....spin your wheels in your mud if you wish, but that is EXACTLY what it is. (and demcrats are appeasement and treason)

When, and if, the Constitution Party ACTUALLY has a snow balls' chance in hell of winning, then, and ONLY then will it not be a vote for the democrat.
71 posted on 01/28/2004 11:34:54 AM PST by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freetolive
a constant theme here is that GWB is better than the alternative....

is he really - at least on the domestic front? (I think we have to concede that a Gore war on terrorism would result in millions dead).

wouldn't the GOP have fought the spending had it been proposed by Gore?

wouldn't the GOP have fought our return to UNESCO?

the post about Bush achievements had some real ones in there, not to mention the intangibles of integrity (these are real, also). Things like medical savings accounts. Ban on PBA. These are REAL.

But his failings are REAL, also. Signing a bill which he said is unconstitutional (let's leave it to the courts) should, legally speaking, be an impeachable offense....

So I am obviously a mixed opinion on this. Iam supporting GWB. But I am fed up with always choosing the lesser of two evils. Especially when I'm not entirely certain that just having one of our guys in there is the lesser of two evils, seeing as we fight a whole lot harder in divided government.

72 posted on 01/28/2004 11:34:56 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Focus

Keep the faith and hang in there,
We need you, don’t lose sight.
Your support and yes your vote,
Will make this come out right.
It’s early yet but time moves fast,
So please don’t wait too long.
Let’s pull together once again,
To keep our country strong.
Kerry, Clark, or Howard Dean,
Who knows which one will be.
The one the democrats will pick,
To be their nominee.
The lucky winner gets to run,
A race he must not win.
Yes come November Oh Oh Four,
George Bush it is again!

Conspiracy Guy 1/27/04
73 posted on 01/28/2004 11:34:57 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Conspiracy Guy's comments may not reflect his own opinions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DMCA
So let's deconstruct this brilliant list of your's.

1: Ignore what user has posted - You have clearly invented a device that allows you to trace someone's web connection, look through a computer screen and dteremine whether they really read what other users are posting. I salute you on your enginuity and look forward to seeing your picture grace the cover of Money magazine.

2: Insult User - You'd never do that. You're way too much of a humanitarian.

3: Point out signup date:You've picked all that up in your one week here, huh?

4: Refuse to debate. - Please feel free to respond. I eagerly await your response.

5: Ping others to harass user. - You ping your goons, I'll ping mine.

6: Still refuse to answer questions raised by poster. - Find me a statement in this individual's post that wasn't declarative.
74 posted on 01/28/2004 11:35:04 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Texas; more churches than any other state in the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Given what has occured during the posting of this thread...


Make your case...... You have the opportunity to tell us who to vote for and more importantly who does 'Conservative Coulter' suggest we vote for other than President Bush? Name someone she suggest and provide a link......

You are front and center.... in the lime light.... the stage is yours.......
75 posted on 01/28/2004 11:35:14 AM PST by deport (BUSH - CHENEY 2004.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Swanks
The danger in that argument is far less than the danger of a Democrat President. Here's something to refresh your memory.
76 posted on 01/28/2004 11:35:41 AM PST by thoughtomator ("I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid"-Qadafi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
WHY WAS THE ORIGINAL POST REMOVED!?!?!???

Are we afraid of ideas? Can we not look squarely at the arguments, and articulate our own responses??

I have long respected FR, but this kinda crap is downright libral-esce!!!!

This is frightening.... if we are only going to allow opinions that we agree with, than WTF are we doing here? Stroking our egos?
77 posted on 01/28/2004 11:35:43 AM PST by GoGoMax (What the Hell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

78 posted on 01/28/2004 11:35:53 AM PST by Johnny Gage (Why do people make rubber duckies yellow, when real ducks are green, or brown?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoGoMax
WHY WAS THE ORIGINAL POST REMOVED!?!?!???

If you want to see the original post, click on "History" in the header. It's still there.

79 posted on 01/28/2004 11:36:37 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: apillar; Wolfstar; Southack
Note apillar's post, #65. If it's not on the list, it should be.
80 posted on 01/28/2004 11:36:42 AM PST by EllaMinnow (If you want to send a message, call Western Union.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson