Zot!! 9 Reasons Conservatives Should Vote For Bush

Photo ^ | 1-28-04

[VRWCmember]

Normal FR(BushBot) response to anything negative about Bush.
1: Ignore what user has posted.
2: Insult User
3: Point out signup date:
4: Refuse to debate.
5: Ping others to harass user.
6: Still refuse to answer questions raised by poster.

Care to address post #6? It's a pretty thorough answer to the hyperbole contained in the original "article".

[King Black Robe]

Ah...someone who knows how to debate (post #6)without invective. Cool. Nice job. Very smart.

[Swanks]

I guess I ought to listen to someone whose screen name is the same as that of a defunct porn magazine.

really? I've had my name for 40 years and until now didn't know there was a Porn mag with the same name. It took you to enlighten me on that tier of porn mags below Penthouse and Playboy. Are there others you read...

[finnman69]

[apillar]

Can also add to this list under Second Amendment

Signed the 2004 Omnibus Budget 1/26/2004 that required background check information be destroyed within 24 hours of the completion of the check.

[kidd]

I support the Constitution Party, but this list is composed almost entirely of domestic issues. And it doesn't consider how bad a democrat might be.

Except for maybe Lieberman, all of the potential democrat candidates would be miserable dangerous failures on all international issues. And none of the democrat candidates would be any better than Bush on domestic issues - and would be much worse in regards to the appointment of Federal judges.

I will vote for the CP if it doesn't help the DEMs, but I'm afraid that its more important to cast an anti-DEM vote.

[mhking]

Care to address post #6?

Psssst.... He can't. He's not here.

[Jim Robinson]

And some of the reasons why we should vote to re-elect President Bush are:

Bush won't hand over U.S. sovereignty to the U.N. like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush will defend America rather than surrendering to the French, et al, like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush won't sign onto America killers like Kyoto or the so-called world court, world government, etc., like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

Bush is pro-life, pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-America, pro-God and will NOT appoint liberal activist judges like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, et al, will.

If you are at all interested in stopping the Marxist liberal take-over of America, then here's the place to draw the line.

[MJY1288]

Ann Coulter is voting for George W. Bush, not one of your unelectable candidates from what ever fringe group you hail from. Got it Noobee?

[lilylangtree]

From the photo, they look like variations on the same theme. Cloned!

[Moby Grape]

Churchill once said that appeasement, while not actually treason, often has the same result....similarly, A VOTE FOR THE CONSTITUTION PARTY, or a non vote, IS A VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT CANDIDATE....spin your wheels in your mud if you wish, but that is EXACTLY what it is. (and demcrats are appeasement and treason)

When, and if, the Constitution Party ACTUALLY has a snow balls' chance in hell of winning, then, and ONLY then will it not be a vote for the democrat.

[ConservativeDude]

a constant theme here is that GWB is better than the alternative....

is he really - at least on the domestic front? (I think we have to concede that a Gore war on terrorism would result in millions dead).

wouldn't the GOP have fought the spending had it been proposed by Gore?

wouldn't the GOP have fought our return to UNESCO?

the post about Bush achievements had some real ones in there, not to mention the intangibles of integrity (these are real, also). Things like medical savings accounts. Ban on PBA. These are REAL.

But his failings are REAL, also. Signing a bill which he said is unconstitutional (let's leave it to the courts) should, legally speaking, be an impeachable offense....

So I am obviously a mixed opinion on this. Iam supporting GWB. But I am fed up with always choosing the lesser of two evils. Especially when I'm not entirely certain that just having one of our guys in there is the lesser of two evils, seeing as we fight a whole lot harder in divided government.

[Conspiracy Guy]

Focus

Keep the faith and hang in there,
We need you, don’t lose sight.
Your support and yes your vote,
Will make this come out right.
It’s early yet but time moves fast,
So please don’t wait too long.
Let’s pull together once again,
To keep our country strong.
Kerry, Clark, or Howard Dean,
Who knows which one will be.
The one the democrats will pick,
To be their nominee.
The lucky winner gets to run,
A race he must not win.
Yes come November Oh Oh Four,
George Bush it is again!

Conspiracy Guy 1/27/04

[.cnI redruM]

So let's deconstruct this brilliant list of your's.

1: Ignore what user has posted - You have clearly invented a device that allows you to trace someone's web connection, look through a computer screen and dteremine whether they really read what other users are posting. I salute you on your enginuity and look forward to seeing your picture grace the cover of Money magazine.

2: Insult User - You'd never do that. You're way too much of a humanitarian.

3: Point out signup date:You've picked all that up in your one week here, huh?

4: Refuse to debate. - Please feel free to respond. I eagerly await your response.

5: Ping others to harass user. - You ping your goons, I'll ping mine.

6: Still refuse to answer questions raised by poster. - Find me a statement in this individual's post that wasn't declarative.

[deport]

Given what has occured during the posting of this thread...

---

Make your case...... You have the opportunity to tell us who to vote for and more importantly who does 'Conservative Coulter' suggest we vote for other than President Bush? Name someone she suggest and provide a link......

You are front and center.... in the lime light.... the stage is yours.......

[thoughtomator]

The danger in that argument is far less than the danger of a Democrat President. Here's something to refresh your memory.

[GoGoMax]

WHY WAS THE ORIGINAL POST REMOVED!?!?!???

Are we afraid of ideas? Can we not look squarely at the arguments, and articulate our own responses??

I have long respected FR, but this kinda crap is downright libral-esce!!!!

This is frightening.... if we are only going to allow opinions that we agree with, than WTF are we doing here? Stroking our egos?

[Johnny Gage]

[mhking]

WHY WAS THE ORIGINAL POST REMOVED!?!?!???

If you want to see the original post, click on "History" in the header. It's still there.

[EllaMinnow]

Note apillar's post, #65. If it's not on the list, it should be.