Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/27/2004 9:03:35 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pokey78
I think more libs are hearing it then it appears. Another website that I am a member of has forums that are like clones of DU. So far, not one of the rabid Bush haters or the large collection of U.S. hating Eurotrash has said a word about Kay's statements. Normally, anything bad about Bush is posted as fast as it would be at DU.
2 posted on 01/27/2004 9:06:24 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
So Where's the WMD?

In Syria where else??
3 posted on 01/27/2004 9:07:26 PM PST by chicagolady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
John Kerry of all people now claims that, because Mr. Kay's Iraq Study Group has not found stockpiles of WMD or a mature nuclear program, President Bush somehow "misled" the country

Sounds very close to George Romney's campaign-killer, "I was brainwashed."

4 posted on 01/27/2004 9:07:41 PM PST by TheLibrarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
A fine article to juxtapose with tomorrow morning's NYT editorial
5 posted on 01/27/2004 9:22:21 PM PST by Cosmo (Liberalism is for Girls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Again, it is worthwhile to crack a history book. Was Hitler dangerous before he invaded Poland and started World War II? All he had then was "conventional weapons." Not a "weapon of mass distruction" in sight.

Of course, after the war began he developed V-2 rockets, a prototype of jet planes, and was working on the atomic bomb. And it was Hitler's intent to seek an atomic bomb that led Einstein and others to write their famous letter to FDR which led to the Manhattan Project.

Should the world have waited until Hitler DID have confirmable WMDs before acting against him? If so, what level of proof would have been sufficient for the doubters? The murder of half of the citizens of London? The murder of all of them?

I know that most of the Democrat candidates and most of their voters would flee in terror from a history book. Facts are just a record of right-wing conspiracies of the past, don't you know. But isn't there just a single, lame-stream media reporter who can find the history section in the nearest library and wants to get a scoop?

If that one reporter is lurking here, he/she should look under "Third Reich," and then under "technological development." Nobody else in the press has the story. It's the scoop of a lifetime.

Congressman Billybob

Click here, then click the blue CFR button, to join the anti-CFR effort (or visit the "Hugh & Series, Critical & Pulled by JimRob" thread).

6 posted on 01/27/2004 9:35:34 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Remember what the Dems were telling us during the cold war.....that the Soviets were nice people and it was all our fault.
11 posted on 01/28/2004 2:09:37 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
But Mr. Kay's Study Group has also discovered plenty to suggest that Saddam couldn't come clean because he knew he wasn't. In his interim report last year, Mr. Kay disclosed a previously unknown Iraq program for long-range missiles; this was a direct violation of U.N. resolutions....

By all means let Congress explore why the CIA overestimated Saddam's WMD stockpiles this time around. But let's do so while recalling that the CIA had underestimated the progress of his nuclear, chemical and biological programs before the first Gulf War. We are also now learning that the CIA has long underestimated the extent and progress of nuclear programs in both Libya and Iran. Why aren't Democrats and liberals just as alarmed about those intelligence failures?

Intelligence is as much art and judgment as it is science, and it is inherently uncertain. We elect Presidents and legislators to consider the evidence and then make difficult policy judgments that the voters can later hold them responsible for. Mr. Kay told National Public Radio that, based on the evidence he has seen from Iraq, "I think it was reasonable to reach the conclusion that Iraq posed an imminent threat." He added that "I must say I actually think what we learned during the inspection made Iraq a more dangerous place potentially, than in fact we thought it was even before the war."

This may be too complex for most Dems to grasp. Even the Dem candidates acquired their epithet "naive" the old fashioned way; they earned it.

14 posted on 01/28/2004 5:45:48 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
If GOP'ers were as dishonest as the Dems and their media psychophants these would be the headlines:

KERRY MISLED COUNTRY INTO WAR!
Cited Hussein's possession of WMD as reason for war vote

KERRY LIED!
Alleged WMD stockpiles not found despite senator's assurances

15 posted on 01/28/2004 7:15:57 AM PST by HenryLeeII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

18 posted on 01/28/2004 7:06:06 PM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson