Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tdadams
It's impossible to discuss with you because your foundation seems to be (correct me if I'm wrong) that there's nothing harmful or inherently destructive about same sex behavior, there is no "gay" agenda, and the morality and immorality don't exist. And that if I or anyone else disagrees with this platform, we're vitriolic and "anti-gay".

P.S. What do you mean by "anti-gay"?
19 posted on 01/27/2004 1:34:18 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
your foundation seems to be (correct me if I'm wrong) that there's nothing harmful or inherently destructive about same sex behavior

That's correct. I don't think there is. I would also disagree with your characterization that homosexuality is nothing more than a "behavior". Are you only heterosexual while you're having sex, or is it part of the person you are? And notwithstanding all the hysteria and chest-thumping around here, I've heard no convincing argument that there is anything harmful or destructive about it.

there is no "gay" agenda

Incorrect. There definitely is a 'gay agenda' and anyone with two eyes can see it. But that doesn't mean gays as a whole subscribe to it or necessarily support it. Nor is every gay person the flamboyant drag queen dancing on a parade float. Mostly, there's the person working in the office next to you minding their own business.

and the morality and immorality don't exist

Of course morality and immorality exist. I don't happen to consider a voluntary relationship between two adults to be immoral. I consider denigration and vitriol against your fellow human being to be immoral.

23 posted on 01/27/2004 2:06:32 PM PST by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson