Replies

your foundation seems to be (correct me if I'm wrong) that there's nothing harmful or inherently destructive about same sex behavior

That's correct. I don't think there is. I would also disagree with your characterization that homosexuality is nothing more than a "behavior". Are you only heterosexual while you're having sex, or is it part of the person you are? And notwithstanding all the hysteria and chest-thumping around here, I've heard no convincing argument that there is anything harmful or destructive about it.

there is no "gay" agenda

Incorrect. There definitely is a 'gay agenda' and anyone with two eyes can see it. But that doesn't mean gays as a whole subscribe to it or necessarily support it. Nor is every gay person the flamboyant drag queen dancing on a parade float. Mostly, there's the person working in the office next to you minding their own business.

and the morality and immorality don't exist

Of course morality and immorality exist. I don't happen to consider a voluntary relationship between two adults to be immoral. I consider denigration and vitriol against your fellow human being to be immoral.

(me) Your foundation seems to be (correct me if I'm wrong) that there's nothing harmful or inherently destructive about same sex behavior.

(you) That's correct. I don't think there is. I would also disagree with your characterization that homosexuality is nothing more than a "behavior".

There you go. We'd have to settle this issue before any further discussion. So, have you read any of scripter's database of articles explaining the correlation between homosexual behavior and disease?

(And as far as homosexuality being more than behavior, that is a very mysterious assertion. Homosexuality MEANS two men having sex together, or two women. Or I guess more than two. But that is the definition!