To: roses of sharon
Their logic and melo-dramatics sound like the Dems. Yep.......so much so that I wouldn't be surprised to find some moles in these groups. After all, many are working against the re-election of Bush - translation - for the election of a Democrat.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
>>Yep.......so much so that I wouldn't be surprised to find some moles in these groups. After all, many are working against the re-election of Bush - translation - for the election of a Democrat.
Who cares? Bush has embraced so much of the Democrat's agenda that it's getting more and more difficult to tell them apart. I actually look forward to the days of gridlock when one party controls Congress and the other party controls the White House. With gridlock in place, it's more difficult for politicians to spend my money. Furthermore, Bush has even surpassed Slick Willie in the area of spending and expanding big government. I'm certainly not voting for Bush because of his efforts to give amnesty to illegal aliens, his signing of "campaign finance reform" into law, his Clintonian Medicare bill, his creation of vast new government bureaucracies such as the "Homeland Security" department, his support for the so-called "Patriot Act", his support of the pork-ladden farm bill, his support for the reauthorization of the "assault weapons ban", his lies about WMD in Iraq, etc. To hell with Bush!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson