To: Southflanknorthpawsis
>>Yep.......so much so that I wouldn't be surprised to find some moles in these groups. After all, many are working against the re-election of Bush - translation - for the election of a Democrat.
Who cares? Bush has embraced so much of the Democrat's agenda that it's getting more and more difficult to tell them apart. I actually look forward to the days of gridlock when one party controls Congress and the other party controls the White House. With gridlock in place, it's more difficult for politicians to spend my money. Furthermore, Bush has even surpassed Slick Willie in the area of spending and expanding big government. I'm certainly not voting for Bush because of his efforts to give amnesty to illegal aliens, his signing of "campaign finance reform" into law, his Clintonian Medicare bill, his creation of vast new government bureaucracies such as the "Homeland Security" department, his support for the so-called "Patriot Act", his support of the pork-ladden farm bill, his support for the reauthorization of the "assault weapons ban", his lies about WMD in Iraq, etc. To hell with Bush!
To: dixiepatriot
You nailed it.
30 posted on
01/27/2004 1:03:29 PM PST by
The Toll
To: dixiepatriot
I sadly agree.
31 posted on
01/27/2004 1:05:35 PM PST by
RiflemanSharpe
(An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
To: dixiepatriot
Amen!
I'm surprised that the Bushbots here haven't posted Southack's "Litany of Wonderful Things President Bush has Done", which anyone could do about any President. It is a mindless exercise. If a President happened to be liberal, and using that laundry list format, he could be made to sound like a right winger, and vice versa.
Blind loyalty is dangerous.
63 posted on
01/27/2004 2:50:29 PM PST by
VMI70
(...but two Wrights made an airplane)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson