I did NOT say, not once, that there was " zero " surveillance going on by the government. Please get someone to explain what each post says; you're either having far too much difficulty with comprehending the written word, or are just an outright LIAR !
And,you are so confused, that it is beyond belief! If Rush was unaware of government installed " trigger points ", then why did he take the amount that would NOT " trigger " an investigation ?
You don't know what you're talking about, are backpedaling as fast as you can, and still losing mightily! You know what they say about stop digging that hole, don't you ? If you don't stop now, you're going to look even worse than you do already! JUST GIVE UP, BACK AWAY,AND FIND ANOTHER THREAD TO PLAY THE FOOL ON.
You see posted what you want/imagine; NOT what is actually posted.From that, you go on to extrapolate, based on your own perceived delusion, and try to ignore the continued refutations. THIS WILL NOT STAND SCRUTINY !
GO find a mirror and argue with yourself, because it's useless to keep attempting to argue with me, about things I did not say nor imply!
I am so sorry. I got you mixed up with another poster (the originator of this whole string of posts) who claimed the 'zero' thing. Your psots were to my response to that post and I erroneously thought you were him (I've been posting a fair amount today and the string of 'my comments', including assorted bumps, is getting quite long and difficult to reference. I understand how we have been on entirely different subjects now. I again apologize for the confusion, it's apparently all or mostly my fault. It isn't lies, it's carelessness and I must have sounded seriously confused to you at best (which I definitely was).
BTW, do we agree that goverment surveilance is objectionable to a free people and not a conservative principle? That's what my position is, nothing else.