Skip to comments.
Wesley Clark Admits Targeting Civilians In Yugoslavia
Democracy Now ^
| 2004-01-26
| JEREMY SCAHILL
Posted on 01/26/2004 12:56:38 PM PST by DTA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
-unindicted war criminal in his own words-
1
posted on
01/26/2004 12:56:39 PM PST
by
DTA
To: Alamo-Girl; dennisw; Destro; getoffmylawn; *balkans; joan
Wesley Clark interview - a must read.
2
posted on
01/26/2004 12:59:13 PM PST
by
DTA
(you ain't seen nothing yet)
To: DTA
And he's Michael Moore's guy.
3
posted on
01/26/2004 12:59:50 PM PST
by
Rocko
(Michael Moore is a big fat idiot.)
To: DTA
Look, if a liberal Democratic president can sexually abuse, fondle and rape women with impunity, then a liberal Democratic presidential candidate is certainly entitled to 'off' a few innocent people and lie about it.
4
posted on
01/26/2004 1:01:00 PM PST
by
Spok
To: Ann Coulter
Wesley Clark interview ping
5
posted on
01/26/2004 1:01:36 PM PST
by
DTA
(you ain't seen nothing yet)
To: DTA
Great find. The more Clark speaks, the more he hangs himself.
6
posted on
01/26/2004 1:03:00 PM PST
by
Quilla
To: DTA
bump
7
posted on
01/26/2004 1:04:12 PM PST
by
murdoog
(i just changed my tag line)
To: DTA
Indeed. Thanks for the ping!
To: GOP_Thug_Mom
PING
9
posted on
01/26/2004 1:05:27 PM PST
by
pax_et_bonum
(Always finish what you st)
To: DTA
Very interesting contrast of the Clinton/Bush schools of wielding American military power.
Thanks for posting.
10
posted on
01/26/2004 1:06:49 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: DTA
You knew he wouldn't last.
He'll finish fourth tonight, if that.
To: Rocko
The irony of Michael Moore supporting Clark is that he wrote a scathing, right on the mark, attack of the way the war was prosecuted.
Why he is now ignoring his own words is a puzzlement.
12
posted on
01/26/2004 1:07:19 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
To: DTA
"I did not know that the tape was accelerated. I don't think it was three times. I think it was one-and-a-half times."
Well which is it - not accelerated or one and a half times? Clark can't hold a candle to Clinton's lying abilities.
13
posted on
01/26/2004 1:09:47 PM PST
by
Quilla
To: DTA
"Wesley Clark Admits Targeting Civilians In Yugoslavia"
Now all we have to do is get Clark to admit that he and the Clinton regime also targeted American civilians in the US.
14
posted on
01/26/2004 1:11:22 PM PST
by
Toespi
To: OldFriend
It's not a puzzlement, Moore just hates Republicans so much.
15
posted on
01/26/2004 1:12:11 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: Toespi
>>>>>Now all we have to do is get Clark to admit that he and the Clinton regime also targeted American civilians in the US<<<<
Wesley Clark and Clintoon drew first blood in Waco, Tx. Serbia was a follow up for them.
16
posted on
01/26/2004 1:18:19 PM PST
by
DTA
(you ain't seen nothing yet)
To: OldFriend; dfwgator
Moore hates Bush and Republicans so much that he'll choose a dork like Clark just for his stars. Clark embodies that military image that lefties wish they could have. Conservatives are strong on nat'l defense, military, etc. and this is their way of saying "me too!". Too bad for them, the only guy they can get is such a cornball.
To: DTA
Wow!
18
posted on
01/26/2004 1:21:28 PM PST
by
DBrow
To: AnnaZ
I cannot believe this guy is tunning for office.
19
posted on
01/26/2004 1:25:56 PM PST
by
Feiny
(Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.)
To: DTA
Ex-Dutch PM questioned in NATO bombing trial | 17:55 -> 19:20 | B92, Reuters
THE HAGUE -- Monday Ex-Dutch Prime Minister Wim Kok told a court on Monday his government did not have any influence over pinpointing specific NATO bomb targets in Serbia five years ago in a damages claim by relatives of victims.
A lawyer representing relatives of those killed in NATO raids on a Serbian state television station in Belgrade and the Nis region quizzed the elder statesman at a hearing which they hope could eventually lead to a civil damages case.
Kok was premier of the Netherlands - a founding member of NATO - during 1999 air strikes by the alliance against the former Yugoslavia in a bid to force it to withdraw from Kosovo where its troops were blamed for driving out the majority ethnic Albanian population.
At a preliminary hearing in the Hague district court, Kok said that while NATO member states agreed to air strikes against certain types of targets, "the Netherlands did not have any influence on the choice of individual targets".
More than a dozen victims and relatives of victims from NATO attacks on the RTS television station on April 23 and on Nis on May 7, 1999, initiated the hearing to determine whether there is evidence the air strikes breached humanitarian law.
"They (the plaintiffs) are considering civil proceedings against the state and eventually also against the people, who according to them were responsible for decision making on the attacks," the Hague court said.
Also testifying today, former Dutch Foreign Minister Jozias van Aartsen said the national television station was an important communication tool of the Serb side. It was the private property of Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic and his family, he told the court.
Kok admitted there had been a lot of technical problems during the bombing of Nis on May 7, in which cluster bombs are said to have killed 15 people in the towns market place. The former PM said this did not mean the use of cluster bombs was illegal.
The head of the Association of Peace Lawyers, one of the groups behind the charges, said the preliminary hearing had established the need for a full trial.
I think its been established that the Dutch government was involved in the decision-making within NATO and that it was responsible for the selection of targets and the attacks that ensued, said Meindert Stelling.
B92 learns from unofficial sources that some relatives of the victims dismissed Dutch lawyer Nik Steinen over his involvement in the defence of Milosevic at the UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson