Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
You still have not answer the substance of the arguement.
56 posted on 01/26/2004 1:49:36 PM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: RiflemanSharpe
There is no substance to the argument. Bush is not as conservative as some may wish. Some things go against their wishes. But the gist and purpose of this article is to fuel the argument that George Bush vs. Pick-your-favorite-Democrat is no choice.

It is pointless to argue to your deaf ears, but I think there are numerous points that defy this claim and if you were honest, you would admit it.

Just for starters, why don't you explain how Al Gore would have been no worse for America, post 9-11, and how an anti-war kook in the WH next year will make no difference.

Or maybe it's that you actually have no problem with partial birth abortion.

Wait.....maybe it's that silly old Supreme Court. Yeah, that's it. It makes no difference who appoints justices to the SCOTUS; they're all the same. Right?

58 posted on 01/26/2004 2:04:30 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson