Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RiflemanSharpe
There is no substance to the argument. Bush is not as conservative as some may wish. Some things go against their wishes. But the gist and purpose of this article is to fuel the argument that George Bush vs. Pick-your-favorite-Democrat is no choice.

It is pointless to argue to your deaf ears, but I think there are numerous points that defy this claim and if you were honest, you would admit it.

Just for starters, why don't you explain how Al Gore would have been no worse for America, post 9-11, and how an anti-war kook in the WH next year will make no difference.

Or maybe it's that you actually have no problem with partial birth abortion.

Wait.....maybe it's that silly old Supreme Court. Yeah, that's it. It makes no difference who appoints justices to the SCOTUS; they're all the same. Right?

58 posted on 01/26/2004 2:04:30 PM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Southflanknorthpawsis
The substance is Bush has signed and propose numerous items I consider very leftist. The pill bill, the amnesty, and runaway spending the list goes on. If a dem did this the I think the majority of the people on this board would be very vocally angry. Then why is it alright for Bush to abandon many things the right holds dear and shift to the left? GWB's shift to the left is why I have decided to vote for the Constitution Party. I am a conservative who will not vote for Bush because of this.
85 posted on 01/26/2004 3:10:44 PM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson