Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open space mission total waste of money
Aberdeen American News ^ | Jan. 25, 2004 | Donna Marmorstein

Posted on 01/25/2004 9:12:37 PM PST by jwalburg

Prescott: Have you heard what the president is proposing now?

Howell: Something about exploration, isn't it?

Prescott: Right. He wants to send a crew out into the great beyond to explore uncharted territory. Have you seen the price tag?

Howell: Yeah. And I understand that much of the funding goes into the pockets of the president's close buddies. One of the guys in charge served as his personal secretary for years, and the other is his good friend, William Clark.

Prescott: There should be an investigation.

Howell: Definitely!

Prescott: It's almost as bad as that Louisiana Purchase deal earlier in the year.

Howell: Talk about wasting taxpayer money on frivolities! No one was even asked about this. The president just went ahead and squandered all this money on a bunch of wasteland no one will ever use!

Prescott: You're telling me!

Howell: How much was it? Twelve million dollars??? Man, you could do a lot of important things with 12 million dollars.

Prescott: Our sailors are being starved from Navy cutbacks and we are going to send 47 men to scamper around the wilderness at government expense? And you know what? Everyone thinks this exploration deal was because of the Louisiana Purchase, but I happen to know that the president was making plans for this back in January, BEFORE there was even talk about purchasing the territory.

Howell: That's pretty incriminating stuff! The Congressional Budget Office should get on this right away.

Prescott: No, I think we'll need a special investigator for this one. The thing is, it isn't 12 million. The public is being told it's 12 million - as if that wasn't enough - but really it's 27 million, with interest figured in. Talk about deficit spending!

Howell: You're kidding me!

Prescott: No. I've looked at the figures. This stupid idea is costing taxpayers 27 million dollars! And for what? It's all a public relations move for Jefferson.

Howell: I heard he thinks that by adding all this land we'll seem big and bad to the Europeans. They won't want to mess with us.

Prescott: That, and the stupid Northwest Passage idea. Northwest Passage! Only pea-brains believe in that Northwest Passage theory. But there's Jefferson for you.

Howell: I understand the vice president has some shady motives for this expedition, too.

Prescott: Aaron Burr! That guy's got ulterior motives in everything he does. And this Lewis and Clark thing is no exception. You knew he lost his seat in the New York Assembly when suspicious financial dealings were leaked to the public, didn't you?

Howell: I heard something about that.

Prescott: Well, now I hear he's been scheming to build up a Trans-Appalachian Empire using new land from this Louisiana Purchase.

Howell: Talk about conflict of interest!

Prescott: I wouldn't be surprised if this whole deal was secretly engineered between Burr and the French. Jefferson is just a puppet, you know. He's been a failure at diplomacy on his own. Burr's behind everything.

Howell: Well, just look at the mess Jefferson made of the Declaration. "Endowed by our Creator!" You'd think the new Republic was run by Church of England fanatics, with language like that inserted in the thing!

Prescott: Did you know that Burr's grandfather was that preacher, Jonathan Edwards? The two of them are in the pocket of the religious right, that's for sure. The explorers have already started this asinine trip, with no real public input, no hearings, no committee debate, no environmental impact reports - nothing! They're taking 6 tons of supplies along, mostly to bribe Indians with. Six tons! And much of it on a stupid keelboat.

Howell: Wonder how far they'll get.

Prescott: I don't know, but there are sure better things to be done with that kind of money. You know what Fisher Ames says about the Louisiana Purchase? "Now - we rush like a comet into infinite space!" He's right! This is a crazy idea. And the Lewis and Clark business is even crazier.

Howell: About as crazy an idea as going to Mars! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Donna Marmorstein writes and lives in Aberdeen. You can contact her at dkmarmorstein@yahoo.com.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; jefferson; lewisandclark; mars; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: Lokibob
This spending will translate into jobs, manufacturing, and prosperity.

How many? How much? I've heard your mantra before and it applies equally well to any large domestic spending project. And since we all know that all domestic spending projects are not equal, your claim has no validity. Without tangibles and quantifiables, instead of grandiose claims, it is a worthless argument.
21 posted on 01/25/2004 9:43:13 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
I think we should just keep using the Stargate for the time being.
22 posted on 01/25/2004 9:43:26 PM PST by JohnnyZ ("This is our most desperate hour. Help me Diane Sawyer. You're my only hope." -- Howard Dean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
I think it was a mistake for Ferdinand and Isabella to waste their money on some Genoese guy named Columbus. Far better to spend money on the domestic front.
23 posted on 01/25/2004 9:45:09 PM PST by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
How many? How much? I've heard your mantra before and it applies equally well to any large domestic spending project. And since we all know that all domestic spending projects are not equal, your claim has no validity. Without tangibles and quantifiables, instead of grandiose claims, it is a worthless argument.

Please don't have any children - since you can't quantify their relative worth and productivity over their potential lifespan, the risk is far too great for you to take.

24 posted on 01/25/2004 9:46:57 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
Your claim is not well founded. No one knew the extent of the natural resources available - thus it was a gamble...just like "Fulton's Folly".

The purchase of a large piece of terrestrial real estate is not even comparable to a blank check for a single-minded technological forray with questionable benefits for the citizens at large. If you think they are equivalent, you are delusional and can't be trusted with public monies. And your argument as to "know the value of" is a red herring. Have you drilled under your property to check to see if there are any hydrocarbons down there? Knowing is a matter of degree. We knew enough to know it was a good deal.
25 posted on 01/25/2004 9:48:59 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
You mean that there may actually be valuable technological breakthroughs and natural resource discovery that are directly related to space exploration??
26 posted on 01/25/2004 9:49:28 PM PST by Porterville (Traitors against God, country, family, and benefactors lament their sins in the deepest part of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
"Undaunted Courage" is a great book on Lewis and Clark if you are into history. Written by the late, ivory-tower, ultra-liberal, McGovern-lover, Nixon-hater Stephen Ambrose... but I don't hold that against him. I can get past that and appreciate what he wrote. His research staff didn't get enough credit though for his success.
27 posted on 01/25/2004 9:50:38 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
Please don't have any children

Oh I get it. Government expenditures on projects should be considered using the same human value system that parents use to justify having offspring. It must be hyperbolic Sunday.
28 posted on 01/25/2004 9:54:40 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Excellent debating method, ask questions that, of course have no quantifiable answers.

The Presidents proposal isn't that expensive, when you look at the details.

It involves a $1 billion increase in NASA's budget, prorated over 10 years. That comes to $100 million per year. To you and I, that is a lot of money, to the gov't, a very small portion of the budget. The Presidents propsal is more a re-direction of the present assets and budget.
29 posted on 01/25/2004 9:57:22 PM PST by Lokibob (All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
Communication between NASA and the rovers only requires 10 minutes...where'd you come up with the "days, months, and years" ????

-------------------

Going to Mars is good showy public relations chatter to impress halfwits, but it is, in fact, a bust. It is so cold there that there are carbon dioxide, dry ice, storms. It's a useless death trap. As long as I'm not one of the people chosen to go there, I don't care.

The nearest star is Alpha Centauri, if I remember correctly. It might have livable and productive planets similar to earth. It would be a potentially worthwhile trip. However, at 4 1/2 light years away it would require most of an adult lifetime to get there traveling 10,000 miles a second. If you hit a piece of space debris the suze of a pea at that speed, it would go through the space ship like a nuclear explosion.

It's one thing to be a man of vision and to talk about space travel. It's a far different to be a man of ignorant fantasy and hallucination. George Bush should have taken a course in Physics instead of guts courses.

30 posted on 01/25/2004 9:58:05 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
The purchase of a large piece of terrestrial real estate is not even comparable to a blank check for a single-minded technological forray with questionable benefits for the citizens at large.

Please see the following link: The Best of NASA Spinoffs. If you disagree so strongly with the money spent to date on a "single-minded technological forray with questionable benefits for the citizens at large", please do not use the technologies developed from such research.

If you think they are equivalent, you are delusional and can't be trusted with public monies.

In fact, I personally have saved the U.S. Taxpayer over $14,000.00 during the course of a very small research project for the U.S. Geological Survey. Can you say the same?

And your argument as to "know the value of" is a red herring.

A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic.

I propose that you do not understand what consitutes a "red herring". The relative value and potential of acquired real estate (in this case the Louisiana Purchase) is hardly an irrelevant topic in connection with your previous statements.

Have you drilled under your property to check to see if there are any hydrocarbons down there?

A classic example of a "red herring" - thank you for providing it. BTW, we own our property down to a depth of 200-feet...fairly standard within suburban residential real estate. I know because this was one of my first questions at closing.

31 posted on 01/25/2004 10:04:18 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Thank you. You are the first person in this thread to actually quote numbers. You are heads above those who have portrayed me as "anti-progress" or simply suggest that we must do it because it's there. A billion over ten years doesn't seem so bad. A drop in the bucket really.
32 posted on 01/25/2004 10:06:10 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
You wrote in Post #21 the following:

any large domestic spending project

I can't think of any larger domestic spending project than having and raising children.

33 posted on 01/25/2004 10:07:39 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
They said the same things when we bought Alaska.
34 posted on 01/25/2004 10:09:12 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Going to Mars is good showy public relations chatter to impress halfwits

You have just insulted every geologist, geomorphologist, geophysicist, astrophysicist, planetary scientist, astronomer, assorted engineers, and the interested public on the planet. How does it feel?

35 posted on 01/25/2004 10:11:30 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
Having worked in a sister organisation within the Department of the Interior, I am well aquainted with all the praddling that goes on at the USGS. You could have saved taxpayers even more by quitting and getting a job in the private sector. Did you publish some deep thinking circular that no one will read? Never in my life have I seen more useless overeducated people contribute so little with so much waste and spend so much time justifying their own existance than in the federal government.
36 posted on 01/25/2004 10:16:09 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RLK
as you say, using 4.5 light years as the distance to Alpha Centauri, and only going 10,000 miles per second, instead of the 186,000 miles per second light travels, it would take roughly 83.7 years to reach Alpha Centauri ...

the highest (roughly) velocity I'm aware of is the TLI burn to the Moon for Apollo which was about 25,000mph, or about 6.94 miles per second. At TLI speed, it would take 120,528 years to reach Alpha Centauri.

I think the temperature range on Mars ranges from about 100 Fareheit to about 185 below at night. Of course this varies all over the planet. The first is comfortable, but the latter is virtually unsurvivable ...

Space travel is a neat and exciting idea ... but we're a long way from Star Trek ... too bad ... it would be pretty cool ...
37 posted on 01/25/2004 10:16:51 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Well, I do have news for you. The United States is roughly seven trillion clams in the hole at this time with no end in sight.

$7 Trillion Clams? I heard it was a 100 Bajillion zillion. Where on earth did you get such a number? Let me lend you a hand space head, your off by a factor of about 14. It's not chump change, but it is not 7 trillion either. If your going to say crap that's off the wall like that at least be accurate.
Since we're on the subject of silly assertions, let us propose that all Americans move back to the 13 original colonies, or better yet, let's move back to England, there is no need to move forward after all, Better yet, lets really roll back progress, 2000 years ago, my family was likely a part of Rome, lets go back to there.
progress is expensive, but it turned a tiny country like Portugal into a major league power for a couple of centuries. You know why is not anymore? It turned it's back on expansion and exploration, now I hear it is a lovely little tourist spot.
That is how the world works you expand or you die, there is no status quo. The Romans Quit expading and died, the portuguese, the British, and now you would have America do the same, no thank you. The benefits will far out weigh the costs. Lewis and Clark, the manhatten project, the apollo project, human genome. All these have or will bear fruits that will benefit all man in our lifetimes. We should have done this 20 years ago, we have been idle too long and frankly I think America is stagnant because it is not really moving forward like it is capable of. This is the kick in the pants human civilization needs. You can put a man on Mars it makes all the petty little wars man fights look like the insignifigant speck it is.

38 posted on 01/25/2004 10:17:07 PM PST by McCloud-Strife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman; marron; All
Finish goal set long ago, in galaxy far, far away***Born into the last great era of boys' tales, I was able to battle across Barsoom (Mars, in Martian-speak) with the Edgar Rice Burroughs character John Carter and decipher Wauxums, Delameters and other space weapons. I knew who spoke for Boskone, the mysterious force for evil in the Burroughs books. I roamed the jungle with Tarzan of the Apes and explored "hot and humid" Venus "hidden behind its clouds." That was before mamas started pushing their little darlings, teenage girls tarted up and pubescent males could concentrate on the important matters in life, like finding lost kingdoms, fighting savage tribes and rocket science instead of sex.

This was, of course, the Golden Age of Science Fiction, when we didn't know enough science to understand most of the fiction was impossible. There's no life on Mars or at least none able to invade Earth, and the Galactics, if any, don't call back. However, in the 1940s many of us believed we'd soon be mining the moon - already technically possible - and by 2000 have explored solar space. But you know what happened.

We went to the moon for the wrong reasons, without a backup plan and with no vision. The Little Earthers prevailed, those who say this planet is enough; who cares what's out there; and we should be content to cultivate our pastures, improve our lot and use our resources to make things better on earth. But I've never bought this; I do not believe the human race was made to ruminate and rusticate like sheep.

I believe we're made to push the envelope, climb mountains, cross the void, strive for heaven and raise hell in Hell if we could locate it. I recall the Little Englanders who could never see beyond their gardens and politics. It was the adventurers and misfits who braved the oceans in cockleshell ships, landed on hostile shores and made America in the first place. Providence provided enough people who paid the price of admiralty, to feed their seas with ships and bones. Without curiosity and bravado, our kind might still be cowering up African trees or in Ice Age caves.***

39 posted on 01/25/2004 10:19:28 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
You have just insulted every geologist, geomorphologist, geophysicist, astrophysicist, planetary scientist, astronomer, assorted engineers, and the interested public on the planet.

-----------------------------

Prove it.

Some of them have a vested interest in lifetime sinecures waiting for them if they make the sale. I don't.

-------------------

How does it feel?

------------------

It feels good. If I don't disturb the stupid complacency and attempts at fraud of at least 100 people a day, then I'm wasting the gifts I was born with.

40 posted on 01/25/2004 10:19:55 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson