Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open space mission total waste of money
Aberdeen American News ^ | Jan. 25, 2004 | Donna Marmorstein

Posted on 01/25/2004 9:12:37 PM PST by jwalburg

Prescott: Have you heard what the president is proposing now?

Howell: Something about exploration, isn't it?

Prescott: Right. He wants to send a crew out into the great beyond to explore uncharted territory. Have you seen the price tag?

Howell: Yeah. And I understand that much of the funding goes into the pockets of the president's close buddies. One of the guys in charge served as his personal secretary for years, and the other is his good friend, William Clark.

Prescott: There should be an investigation.

Howell: Definitely!

Prescott: It's almost as bad as that Louisiana Purchase deal earlier in the year.

Howell: Talk about wasting taxpayer money on frivolities! No one was even asked about this. The president just went ahead and squandered all this money on a bunch of wasteland no one will ever use!

Prescott: You're telling me!

Howell: How much was it? Twelve million dollars??? Man, you could do a lot of important things with 12 million dollars.

Prescott: Our sailors are being starved from Navy cutbacks and we are going to send 47 men to scamper around the wilderness at government expense? And you know what? Everyone thinks this exploration deal was because of the Louisiana Purchase, but I happen to know that the president was making plans for this back in January, BEFORE there was even talk about purchasing the territory.

Howell: That's pretty incriminating stuff! The Congressional Budget Office should get on this right away.

Prescott: No, I think we'll need a special investigator for this one. The thing is, it isn't 12 million. The public is being told it's 12 million - as if that wasn't enough - but really it's 27 million, with interest figured in. Talk about deficit spending!

Howell: You're kidding me!

Prescott: No. I've looked at the figures. This stupid idea is costing taxpayers 27 million dollars! And for what? It's all a public relations move for Jefferson.

Howell: I heard he thinks that by adding all this land we'll seem big and bad to the Europeans. They won't want to mess with us.

Prescott: That, and the stupid Northwest Passage idea. Northwest Passage! Only pea-brains believe in that Northwest Passage theory. But there's Jefferson for you.

Howell: I understand the vice president has some shady motives for this expedition, too.

Prescott: Aaron Burr! That guy's got ulterior motives in everything he does. And this Lewis and Clark thing is no exception. You knew he lost his seat in the New York Assembly when suspicious financial dealings were leaked to the public, didn't you?

Howell: I heard something about that.

Prescott: Well, now I hear he's been scheming to build up a Trans-Appalachian Empire using new land from this Louisiana Purchase.

Howell: Talk about conflict of interest!

Prescott: I wouldn't be surprised if this whole deal was secretly engineered between Burr and the French. Jefferson is just a puppet, you know. He's been a failure at diplomacy on his own. Burr's behind everything.

Howell: Well, just look at the mess Jefferson made of the Declaration. "Endowed by our Creator!" You'd think the new Republic was run by Church of England fanatics, with language like that inserted in the thing!

Prescott: Did you know that Burr's grandfather was that preacher, Jonathan Edwards? The two of them are in the pocket of the religious right, that's for sure. The explorers have already started this asinine trip, with no real public input, no hearings, no committee debate, no environmental impact reports - nothing! They're taking 6 tons of supplies along, mostly to bribe Indians with. Six tons! And much of it on a stupid keelboat.

Howell: Wonder how far they'll get.

Prescott: I don't know, but there are sure better things to be done with that kind of money. You know what Fisher Ames says about the Louisiana Purchase? "Now - we rush like a comet into infinite space!" He's right! This is a crazy idea. And the Lewis and Clark business is even crazier.

Howell: About as crazy an idea as going to Mars! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Donna Marmorstein writes and lives in Aberdeen. You can contact her at dkmarmorstein@yahoo.com.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; jefferson; lewisandclark; mars; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: RLK
stupid complacency and attempts at fraud

I see you have a high regard for our scientific and engineering community.

101 posted on 01/26/2004 12:08:29 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I agree. If you notice I said probably, not never. :-)
102 posted on 01/26/2004 12:09:57 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; RadioAstronomer
the possibility that there may still be solid mass inside Uranus (or Neptune, Jupiter, Saturn), even if it is otherwise gaseous.

Liquid nitrogen down there, if memory serves. .....But your point is well taken -- never say never.

103 posted on 01/26/2004 12:10:25 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
As for Venus, the Soviets were landing probes there back in the 1970s, which managed to return data and pictures for nearly an hour before going offline. I don't think it is too far fetched that we could build more powerful heat shields so that a surface visit could last for a much longer period of time.

Another possibility which could allow colonization of Venus would be some sort of method to breakup the cloud cover of Venus, which is responsible for the 800 degree greenhouse effect. Obviously, the technology to do this isn't with us yet, but I like to think about such possibilities.
104 posted on 01/26/2004 12:11:31 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
As for Venus, the Soviets were landing probes there back in the 1970s, which managed to return data and pictures for nearly an hour before going offline. I don't think it is too far fetched that we could build more powerful heat shields so that a surface visit could last for a much longer period of time.

Sigh! Please go back and re-read my post.

"(with the exception of Venus)"

105 posted on 01/26/2004 12:13:37 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
My contribution to this thread: 35 years after Columbus, Cortes, Lewis and Clark etc, thousands of trappers and settlers were following them on their own dime.

This is what happens when private money gets into the game. That won't happen until the technology matures a little and we start seeing some interesting core samples indicating the presence of who-knows-what. You are right, the explosion into space won't happen until that day. The best we can do in the meantime is keep pushing the technology forward, and start gathering those samples.

Robots can do the science, and 1% of the cost.

I don't think we're necessarily at odds here. I would like to see a series of robot probes checking out likely looking moons and asteroids. We need to be able to do some seismic surveying. If that can be done robotically, fine, if we need men with "boots on the ground(?)" then they will need to be there. As the samples get more interesting, and the technology advances, at some point the two curves cross and suddenly you have Exxon launching their own probes. Or whatever.

106 posted on 01/26/2004 12:14:38 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I see.. you're not a Venus doubter.

I'd like to see another probe to Venus. I doubt the air bag method would be feasible there since they'd likely melt before the probe ever hit the ground.
107 posted on 01/26/2004 12:16:12 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
However, the moons of those planets are truly inviting. :-)

"All these worlds are yours, except Europa. Attempt no landings there." - The Star Child :)

108 posted on 01/26/2004 12:18:54 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I heard of a theory that bacteria that utilize co2 could be seeded in the atmosphere of Venus. It seems to to fall apart when I consider what would happen when the bacteria end up fried in the lower atmosphere thereby returning their bodies to the atmosphere.
109 posted on 01/26/2004 12:19:46 AM PST by DeepDish (I no longer capitalize french or france, only things proper or significant are capitalized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
So I'll support a manned Mars mission, sure thing. Just as soon as the private moon bases are paying for themselves.

By the time the moon bases are paying for themselves, the moon will be pushing for independence, and throwing rocks if it doesn't get it!

My chief concern is that we will have lost our ability, technically and economically, which will leave other nations on Earth ahead of us, in particular, the Chinese. Who controls the seas will ultimately control the land, and this planetary island is no different. If you control and militarize space, who can do anything about it who is not there already?

If we are to remain first-world on our planet, we had best be up to speed off of our planet.

110 posted on 01/26/2004 12:20:25 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (This tagline manufactured in the U.S.A. and is certified prion-free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I too would like to send another probe there. It will be a while before humans can set foot on it however. I wonder if AI in robust machinery will play apart in future exploration.
111 posted on 01/26/2004 12:20:53 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
I agree wholeheartedly. Looking at photos and reading sample descriptions is no substitute for being there.
112 posted on 01/26/2004 12:22:12 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (This tagline manufactured in the U.S.A. and is certified prion-free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
:-)

Ganymede has always been a favorite of mine. It would be worth my life to step foot there.

113 posted on 01/26/2004 12:22:25 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I am off for the evening as well. Nite all.
114 posted on 01/26/2004 12:22:56 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I'm an Io fan myself. .....although it's not exactly a hospitable place.

What interests you about Ganymede? And how about the Saturnian moon, Titan? ....and Neptune's moon, Triton? Those places are pretty cool too.

115 posted on 01/26/2004 12:28:36 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: marron
When Kennedy announced a return to the Moon, the people were behind him - then the price was announced and like now, the polls dropped off. Leadership moves great and necessary goals along. Bush is a leader. The naysayers are partisans and/or unimaginative about the true importance of using resources off planet. To be able to do this will facilitate our expansion into the universe, exploding technology and space exploration. Up until now we've gone and looked, now we will use resources. The Moon is man's passageway into the solar system.
116 posted on 01/26/2004 12:30:20 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo


Titan - What We Know:
Titan is the only moon in the solar system with a thick atmosphere surrounding it.
The atmospheric pressure near Titan's surface is 60% greater than Earth at sea level.
The atmospheric temperature near Titan's surface is 95K (-178 C or -288 F).
As on Earth, the most abundant gas in Titan's atmosphere is nitrogen.
Methane is the second most abundant gas; more than a dozen other gases are present.
The thickness (extent) of Titan's atmosphere is about 10 times that of Earth.
A thick haze at 200 km (120 mi) altitude hides Titan's surface at visible wavelengths.
Titan's diameter is 5150 km (3200 mi), about 40% as large as Earth.
Titan is the second largest moon in the solar system; only Jupiter's Ganymede is larger.
Titan and Ganymede are both larger than the planets Mercury and Pluto.
Titan apparently keeps its same face toward Saturn as it orbits the planet.
Titan orbits Saturn at a distance of 1,221,830 km (759,210 mi) from Saturn's center.
Titan orbits Saturn in just under 16 days (orbital period = 15.9454 days).
Oceans (or lakes) of liquid ethane may cover a large fraction of Titan's surface.
Titan's surface is non-uniform at radar wavelengths.
Titan has a surface feature (continent?) that is bright at infrared wavelengths

Got this here:

http://www.ssd.rl.ac.uk/news/cassini/titan.html

I knew that it had a substantial atmosphere but did not know that it was thicker that Earth's
117 posted on 01/26/2004 12:36:54 AM PST by DeepDish (I no longer capitalize french or france, only things proper or significant are capitalized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
You are questioning the relative merits of research which can propel the US far into the future versus sitting on our arses accepting the status quo.

Did you have to take engineering economic analysis as part of your geochem curriculum? Every engineering project public or private undergoes a detailed analysis of costs and benefits in light of the time value of money. It is something that engineers especially those who work in private industry are accutely aware of. Physics, chem, math and other pure science majors don't have to take even an introductory course and most opt not to because it is both demanding, and seemingly off the path of pure science. But engineers do. It is required at both the undergraduate and graduate level. Pure scientists scoff at the notion of considering such pedestrian concepts as money where you only round to two decimal places, rarely get to use scientific notation, and don't need solutions to the hypergeometric differential equation to understand. Thus they feel immune to it. Besides, the bean counters take care of that stuff anyway, just as long as the grant money lasts. Modern space travel and exploration is applied engineering. It is an engineering project, not a "science project", and in the true spirit of engineering projects needs to be considered using the bottom line. I'm sorry to pop your bubble but the crustal abundance of oxygen isotopes or a pretty xrd of montmorillonite ain't the end all be all. Things cost. That's just a simple fact of the real world. If you weren't so hung up on your geochemist shoulder chip, you might see a real world instead of one that owes you a living in the form of research grants. You aren't the only one who knows who Goldberg was, or can use Phreeq, or knows about lattice packing, or how to prepare an xrd sample. There is a word for financial undertakings that have no demonstrable downstream revenue that offsets costs either known or reasonalby conjectured. They are called hobbies. Another thing that I find disingenous to those who have to foot the bill is all this romantic talk of space colonies and so forth. C'mon people, you don't get it? The exploration of space since the Russians put up Sputnik is all about the militarization of space, plain and simple. If they'd at least come clean and say that without all the romantacising to enchant the taxpaying public, I'd be a bit less skeptical. But that's all it is, a military engineering project. It just happens to be up there and not down here. When the spot price of cataclastic brecciated basalt appears on the London Metals Market I will think of investing. But I reserve the right to invest or not.
118 posted on 01/26/2004 12:55:11 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Piltdown_Woman
I can't wait for the film of you smelling rocks on Mars. LOL.

Yawn. Try harder.

119 posted on 01/26/2004 1:04:42 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
We now have a much broader mission to establish a base, harvest the moons resources,

Great! If it will pay, it will be no problem for private backers to create the Lunar Mining Company on the model of the East India or Hudson Bay Company.

But a hundred billion to gather more moon rocks on the public taxpayer? I don't think so.

120 posted on 01/26/2004 1:07:31 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson