Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Couple lose their home over $120 debt
The Sacramento Bee ^ | January 24, 2004 | Michael Kolber -- Bee Staff Writer

Posted on 01/25/2004 5:49:41 AM PST by DelaWhere

Edited on 04/12/2004 6:04:31 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Couple lose their home over $120 debt By Michael Kolber -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 a.m. PST Saturday, January 24, 2004 Get weekday updates of Sacramento Bee headlines and breaking news. Sign up here.

COPPEROPOLIS -- A retired couple's dispute with their homeowners association has spiraled out of control in this Calaveras County community -- and now they have lost their home less than a year after failing to pay $120 in annual dues.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: abuse; association; constitution; homeowner; property; propertyrights; radcliff; rights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-399 next last
To: Godfollow
except to say that the house was auctioned for $70,000... I can't imagine a house worth $250,000 being auctioned off for 70.

Houses sold at foreclosure sales (any kind of foreclosure) routinely sell at deep discount, because the buyer knows to expect years of expensive litigation before they take possession.

361 posted on 01/26/2004 2:42:59 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
But how can you enter into a contract which abridges inherent, intrinsic rights given by God and recognized under the Constitution? How can government justly enforce such contracts? Are you saying that you can contractually sign away your rights? I was always told you can't, but it happens all the time.

Every contract abridges some of your rights. If you sign an employment contract, you give up your right to stay home and loaf. If that contract requires weekend work, you give up your right to observe the Sabbath. If you take a job as a truckdriver, you are waiving your right to drink alcohol whenever you choose. Etc., etc., etc.

362 posted on 01/26/2004 2:53:24 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
What is the english translation of your tagline?
Inquiring minds and all that. :)
363 posted on 01/26/2004 2:56:36 PM PST by MaryFromMichigan (If a man says something in the woods and there are no women there, is he still wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: Tooters
What is the english translation of your tagline?

"Not under man, but [only] under God and the law." It's a quote from an old English judge named Coke; I picked it up in law school.

364 posted on 01/26/2004 3:00:02 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Thank you.
I enjoy reading your posts.
365 posted on 01/26/2004 3:03:24 PM PST by MaryFromMichigan (If a man says something in the woods and there are no women there, is he still wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Tooters
I enjoy reading your posts.

Thanks!

BTW, I tried your tagline on my wife. She says, "yes, he is still wrong."

366 posted on 01/26/2004 3:06:20 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
Well then, my work here is done...
367 posted on 01/26/2004 3:09:32 PM PST by MaryFromMichigan (If a man says something in the woods and there are no women there, is he still wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: DelaWhere
jeesh, sounds like Victor Hugo's Les Miserables.
I sentence thee to twenty years of hard labor for stealing that loaf of bread.
368 posted on 01/26/2004 3:13:57 PM PST by tang-soo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DelaWhere
A couple of "senseless shootings" here and there will put a timely end to this kind of thing. The ASSociation and their attorney have pushed their luck and gone beyond the bounds of decency in beating up on an old couple when a simple small claims court judgement would have done the trick.

"He had a knee replaced and then was bitten by a spider, which required months of recuperation."

Spider. Did you say spider?

Now where's a good lawyer when you need him to find the Association liable for failing to properly control arthropod pests. Sounds like a case that's ripe for about slam-dunk $250,000 settlement out of court.

After all, the ASSociation's negligence caused the old guy pain and suffering and the loss of his house.

I may yet go to law school at age 55 -- being a hitman is work for dummies who will work for $500 an hour on a sporadic basis..... *~) (with fingers crossed behind my back)

369 posted on 01/26/2004 3:17:17 PM PST by tracer (ay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny_Cipher
I read what your all saying but you don't seem to have the whole story so here it is. When this all started happening both Mr. and Mrs.Radcliff where having health problems. Now the H.O.A. claims to have provided the Radcliffs with all means at their disposal to notify the them of their lein. All except taking a 1(ONE) minute drive to knock on the door. They call themselves a HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIOIN which from the concept of what H.O.A.'s are supposed to represent means AN ASSOCIATION OF HOMEOWNERS COMING TOGETHER TO PRESERVE THE LIFE STYLE OF THE COMMUNITY AND SUPPORT EACH OTHER. Where was the neighborly help in this situation? All the neighbors I've talked to totally support the Radcliffs. As far as the son's not helping. You can't help someone if you don't know they are in trouble. Especially when they don't even know they are in trouble.
370 posted on 01/26/2004 4:11:24 PM PST by JDAS1969 (Cyber Activist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
What's there to litigate... the bank can't resell the house till it is cleared of any encumbrances can it? Anyway, we're a little scant on facts to make much of an issue one way or the other... perhaps the people in the story were not as destitute as made out to be... who knows...
371 posted on 01/26/2004 4:43:12 PM PST by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Let's try another example.

You seek employment with a private corporation or partnership.

As part of the contract for employment you sign a non-compete, non-disclosure contract which includes the statement that your telephone use of the company telephone system will be monitored, at anytime, for any reason, by anyone, without you being made aware of when it is being monitored.

You have no 4th amendment right to object to and prevent that stated corporate procedure.

372 posted on 01/26/2004 4:50:13 PM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Malacoda
The HOA probably needs a load of horse manure dumped on its front steps.
373 posted on 01/26/2004 5:10:21 PM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pointsal
IN REGARDS TO THE RADCLIFFS HORROR STORY
I tried to get a copy of the CC&R's at Copper Cove Lake Tullochs Owners Association Office. I told them I was interested in buying a house down the street and would like to review the CC&r,s before I purchased and was told that they "WOULD NOT GIVE ME A COPY. " I was directed to any local real estate office that they would have a copy I could obtain. The real estate office told the only thing they had on the Association was the original charter from 1969 and that if I wanted a current copy I would recieve it from the sellers of the property or title company AFTER I purchased the property.
374 posted on 01/26/2004 5:53:24 PM PST by JDAS1969 (Cyber Activist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Well - yes property taxes stink - and as a retiree the "no state income tax" is not a draw.

I suppose it's where you settle as to the HOA fees - ours are a pittance really - 48.00 a YEAR - not a month... and if you're lucky enough to find a lot in Unit One - it's only 24.00 a year.. laugh...

As to property taxes - we moved here from North Carolina, where we paid a state income tax - as well as property tax. I'm sure there are better states out there - but as the bumper stickers here say... "I wasn't born in Texas, but got here as fast as I could" ... or " Not a Texan by birth, but a Texan by the grace of God" ... haha
375 posted on 01/26/2004 6:02:34 PM PST by pamlet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
You do realize the benefits of living in a development with a HOA, right? You see, the HOA works to insure that property values remain high through various things - making sure lawns are uniformly cut, your mailbox is of a pre-approved design, you only have certain types of trees and plants, you never ever park in the grass or leave your boat in the driveway, you only paint your house one of four approved colors, you never add a shed or any other detached structures, etc.

Sounds like a dictatorship. What if you want to go on vacation when someone thinks your grass is too high? You can't plant the trees you want but what the others dictate? I'd pay more for a house outside an HOA just to have a little breathing room. But then I wouldn't live in a cult either for the same reasons.

376 posted on 01/26/2004 6:14:42 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: JDAS1969
I think the CC&Rs are filed at the recorders office, too. Wonder if they still charge a buck a page for copies?
377 posted on 01/26/2004 6:37:55 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: DelaWhere
Sounds like a bunch of misery-minded busybodies trying to gouge some old folks...
378 posted on 01/26/2004 6:41:19 PM PST by maxwell (Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDAS1969
In addition those agents are wrong on the CC&Rs coming after you close escrow, if that's what they meant. You as the buyer must have ample time to approve of the title report and CC&R's before closing escrow on property in California. It's in the standard purchase contract. The documents will be provided to you upon the opening of escrow. Which means you have to have a pending contract on the property so, in a way, the agents could have been right.
379 posted on 01/26/2004 6:44:59 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
I see thank you
380 posted on 01/26/2004 7:56:47 PM PST by JDAS1969 (Cyber Activist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-399 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson