Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question: Why won’t Bush & Fox’s illegal-immigrant plan work?
The Orange County Weekly ^ | 01.23.04 | Gustavo Arellano

Posted on 01/23/2004 7:01:23 PM PST by Beck_isright

Answer: Because Mexicans Never Return to Mexico

Question: Why won’t Bush & Fox’s illegal-immigrant plan work?


by Gustavo Arellano

For years, the only phone in my mother’s hometown of El Cargadero, nestled high in the mountains of the desiccated central Mexican state of Zacatecas, was in the house of Salvador Barrios. Whenever someone received a call, Salvador had to jog up and down El Cargadero’s hilly streets and let the person know that someone wanted to talk to them. It didn’t matter if it was night or day, heat or rain: Salvador ran. But thanks to the thousands of dollars that my mother’s fellow expatriate cargaderenses wired to their birthplace over the decades, the Mexican government finally installed telephones in El Cargadero two years ago—and Salvador’s aching legs finally get a rest.

President Bush cites this modernization of El Cargadero and countless other Mexican ranchos as justification for his half-assed revamping of American immigration policy. Bush is calling for the abolishment of the U.S.-Mexico border—but only for Mexicans who register with American companies willing to employee them for a maximum of six years. There is no call for amnesty in Bush’s proposal. Instead, all participants would only attain the minimal rights guaranteed to American workers, such as minimum wage, safety-regulations and sick leave. As a churro on a stick, Bush also suggests the establishment of a lucrative pension fund that workers can only cash in on when they return to Mexico.

Bush presented his program by arguing that Mexican immigrants come to this country only to earn enough cash that can be lived off in Mexico, a view seconded by President Vicente Fox of Mexico. "[Mexicans] are not going to become American citizens, nor do they want U.S. citizenship," Fox told the Associated Press on Jan. 9. "They want to have their rights respected, to get good pay for their work and to be able to visit their families in Mexico."

But El Cargadero’s reality betrays Fox and Bush’s vision. Despite the rancho’s assumption of suburban infrastructure while retaining its pastoral charm, it is dead. Only the elderly, the young, and the drunk remain. Anyone able to migrate did years ago, with more than 1,000 of us residing in Anaheim alone. And while the capital investments in El Cargadero are spectacular—there are even lawns and sprinklers in some yards nowadays—these are monuments to immigrant entrepreneurship experienced only weeks at a time. The rest of the year, the hard labor of a generation stands deserted, a staid museum display rather than a living, breathing community. Even Salvador Barrios’ house is largely empty: all his children migrated when they turned 18.

My ancestral village’s depressing case isn’t exclusive at all. Modern Mexico has come to this: hamlets eagerly embracing the 21st century but with the majority of its children toiling away in el Norte. They’ve been leaving now for a good century, transforming Latinos into the largest American ethnic group. With Mexico’s economy continuing to stagnate, this phenomenon won’t let up anytime soon.

Immigrants send back money to Mexico by the billions—an estimated $14 billion in 2003—and visit come vacation time, residing in now-lavish houses funded by years of sweat. But that’s all Mexico is to them now, a vacation spot. They invariably trek back to the States after realizing life in Mexico is inferior. They imbibe from the damned American cup of success—the higher wages, better living conditions and modern-day comforts—and find it attractive. They have children, who then assimilate to the point where Mexico means nothing other than food and music and where grandma lives.

Bush’s plan ignores this relevant fact, however, since its implementation would be a victory for the American and Mexican governments. Bush’s big business buddies can now legally fill employment shortages that Americans would easily assume if it wasn’t for the insulting pay. These Mexicans never have a chance of becoming citizens, thereby absolving the United States of any true responsibility toward them. Fox, in turn, doesn’t have to improve his own country and allows his paisanos to leave, ensuring that the restless Mexican nation doesn’t heed its centurial call to revolution. The billions sent back maintain Mexico’s economy—and the Mexican government doesn’t even have to worry about taking care of this money spout.

The losers, of course, are the Mexican immigrants—aren’t they always? "Dear and beloved Mexico/If I die far away from you/May they say that I’m sleeping/And that they return me to you," the immortal charro Jorge Negrete sang in "México, Lindo y Querido." All Mexican immigrants—legal and illegal—maintain the illusion of returning one day to Mexico. But they rarely return permanently, and without any possibility for amnesty, illegal immigrants will continue to live in the shadows. All they will have is an empty house in Mexico, a house that keeps their nostalgia but little else.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; crime; illegalalien; immigrantlist; immigration; immigrationplan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last
To: Beck_isright
Not yet. If he executes an E.O. forcing this "proposal" as the law of the land, then yes, he is.

Nice back pedal there.

61 posted on 01/23/2004 8:05:39 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
No backpedal. If he executes his Executive powers or has been proven to knowingly do so in violation of his Constitutional duties, then yes, he's a traitor. It will never be proven in this matter unless he executes an E.O.
62 posted on 01/23/2004 8:07:25 PM PST by Beck_isright ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
It is called strategy, if you really care about the illegal immigrant issue you have to consider tact. Bush is a pro, he has only let me down with the Campaign Finance... but with foreign nations he hasn't let me down once.
63 posted on 01/23/2004 8:09:21 PM PST by Porterville (Traitors against God, country, family, and benefactors lament their sins in the deepest part of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
"What is it about the Reagan era that you are referring to?"

Be a conservative of principle. He had the hutspa to admit he made a mistake with the amnesty he granted.
64 posted on 01/23/2004 8:09:54 PM PST by Beck_isright ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
Though you wouldn't consider Reagan a traitor, would you?
65 posted on 01/23/2004 8:10:46 PM PST by new cruelty (Better the devil you know than the devil don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Ah, so strategery is more important than Homeland Security or principle? We've sunk to the level of demorats to gain power? At what cost? San Diego? Denver? Little Rock?
66 posted on 01/23/2004 8:10:54 PM PST by Beck_isright ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
If he executes his Executive powers or has been proven to knowingly do so in violation of his Constitutional duties, then yes, he's a traitor. It will never be proven in this matter unless he executes an E.O.

Nope, he could issue an EO on perfectly constitutionally sound grounds. The ONLy remedy opponents would have is either Congressional over ride or court challenge. Your opinion that it is treason cannot be supported by law or history.

67 posted on 01/23/2004 8:11:26 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
"Though you wouldn't consider Reagan a traitor, would you?"

No. He had the power to grant "amnesty" to criminals. That is in the Constitution. His failure to enforce the laws of the land and seal the borders though is an issue up to powers greater than I to discuss or enforce. The failure to do that is "traitorous". The escape from that was amnesty and he admitted his mistakes on both counts after he left office. I disagree with both; the laws must be enforced and the borders sealed.
68 posted on 01/23/2004 8:13:26 PM PST by Beck_isright ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA
~ Take the FReeper Immigration Reform Poll ~

A FReeper's Guide To Immigration Reform

"What remains to be seen is if this country has the capacity to accommodate, and assimilate, an unending wave of mass immigration ¯ because failure to do so will result in a balkanized, fragmented, strife-torn and dysfunctional America."

69 posted on 01/23/2004 8:13:57 PM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Press as long as you like... The fact remains, that Senor Bush is not living up to his Oath of Office.
70 posted on 01/23/2004 8:14:29 PM PST by StatesEnemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Yes, he could. And keep in mind the same Congress could charge him with such (unlikely). However my opinion is just that. Whether anyone agrees with that opinion, I really don't care.
71 posted on 01/23/2004 8:14:34 PM PST by Beck_isright ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
Never mind, you're getting hit by to many angles to be rational.
72 posted on 01/23/2004 8:17:33 PM PST by Porterville (Traitors against God, country, family, and benefactors lament their sins in the deepest part of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
You mean like your inability to logically answer one question:

What is the biggest detriment to the US economy due to the current policy and the proposed one?
73 posted on 01/23/2004 8:19:07 PM PST by Beck_isright ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Ya know, you and your ilk are a heap of hypocritical heathens... No beliefs, No principles, no common sense.

We ALL KNOW DAMN WELL that if this TREASONOUS ACT was perpetrated by ClintOOn this board would be RIFE with calls for his head - and rightfully so!.

74 posted on 01/23/2004 8:21:14 PM PST by StatesEnemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA
Are you attending your county precinct meeting?"

I'm holding our precinct meeting. We will pass a VERY Conservative set of planks. These will then go on to the county, and then the state. Each will also pass a VERY conservative platform. Then at the national Convention, an equally Conservative platform will emerge.

And then do you know what happens? That's the last you'll hear of it for the next four years. The Republicans elected will totally ignore the platforms and do as they darned well please.

I have been a Republican PC for over 40 years, and I've yet to see the Republicans abide by, live by and/or fight for the principles that the grass roots wanted. The politicians get back to Washington and from then on, they get their marching orders from the national party, the lobbyests, and the biggest donors, and the rest of us are expected to be good little sheeple, shut up, and work hard to put get them reelected when the time comes. Am I cynical? You bet I am!

75 posted on 01/23/2004 8:22:47 PM PST by holyscroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yooper; NoControllingLegalAuthority
"So, we have identified the problem, Mexico. The solution therefore must logically take place in Mexico. Until Fox and the power structure undertake to improve the lot of the average Mexican, they will continue to flow to that which betters their lives, NO MATTER WHAT WE DO IN THIS COUNTRY."

 
Mexican governors meet at border to discuss U.S. immigration proposals
 

76 posted on 01/23/2004 8:23:01 PM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
Like I said, I believe it is a long term strategy to solve the issue.
77 posted on 01/23/2004 8:23:05 PM PST by Porterville (Traitors against God, country, family, and benefactors lament their sins in the deepest part of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Beck_isright
His failure to enforce the laws of the land and seal the borders though is an issue up to powers greater than I to discuss or enforce.

(sarsacm) My how you feel us normal middle class american citizens are unworthy to discuss situations that affect our very futures and the future of this nation. That's so socialist of you...

78 posted on 01/23/2004 8:23:12 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: StatesEnemy
We ALL KNOW DAMN WELL that if this TREASONOUS AC

Make your case for TREASON as it applies to this proposal.

79 posted on 01/23/2004 8:23:34 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller
"I have been a Republican PC for over 40 years, and I've yet to see the Republicans abide by, live by and/or fight for the principles that the grass roots wanted. The politicians get back to Washington and from then on, they get their marching orders from the national party, the lobbyests, and the biggest donors, and the rest of us are expected to be good little sheeple, shut up, and work hard to put get them reelected when the time comes. Am I cynical? You bet I am!"

Exactly why I quit the party.
80 posted on 01/23/2004 8:24:16 PM PST by Beck_isright ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson