You have, in effect, proposed that today's long, hard, thought-out 'laws' are ineffectual and are not applicable nor capable of explaining 'zero point' energy and free energy technology.
That, in my book, is poo pooing.
THE FACT that we have split the atom seems to underwhelm you; splitting the atom is today the lone, sole source of AMAZING amounts of energy, but, that is underwhelming news. No, you instead point to the modern day alchemist who promises to turn _________ into 'free energy'.
BAD science. Misinterpretation of lab work, incapability of performing valid, technical experiments and tests I say ...