To: LenS
Ms. Stewart was a stockbroker. She knows the rules and she willingly broke them. You don't have a clue as to what she is charged with do you? I will give you a hint...she isn't charged with insider trading.
Facts are such a pain in the ass, but I insist you go get some if you wish to continue this conversation.
To: antaresequity
She is being charged with securities fraud and obstruction of justice. So tell me would she not be charged for securities fraud if she did not participate in insider trading?
14 posted on
01/23/2004 12:54:59 PM PST by
AbsoluteJustice
(By the time you read this 100 other Freepers will have posted what I have said here!)
To: antaresequity
Ms. Stewart was a stockbroker. She knows the rules and she willingly broke them.
You don't have a clue as to what she is charged with do you? I will give you a hint...she isn't charged with insider trading.
Facts are such a pain in the ass, but I insist you go get some if you wish to continue this conversation.
Wouldn't it be easier to just tell everyone she's charged with obstruction of justice rather than bitch about how superior you are to everyone else?
43 posted on
01/23/2004 1:24:53 PM PST by
brownsfan
(I didn't leave the democratic party, the democratic party left me.)
To: antaresequity
Gee, go buy some clues!
Yes, Martha wsas a broker and one for a BOILER ROOM outfit, long ago, but she was a MEDMBER OF THE NYSE BOARD, when she LIED about have a standing order, to sell ImClone at 60, with her broker, which she DID NOT and THAT is a fact. :-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson