Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BureaucratusMaximus
Keep whatever you want! I just stated what I believe and don't see the need -- if you do, keep it. I think it is much ado about nothing since the President has not stated he is going to make the AWB harder.

I guess I don't have a right to my opinion without ridicule. Don't think macho types are into milk and cookies either!

My Dad had rifles, shotguns, and I think a handgun but you know what he wasn't macho about it and used them for hunting. Automatic weapons he was not in favor of owning because they could fall in the hands of people not qualified to use them. Guess he should be serving milk and cookies too?

227 posted on 01/23/2004 8:50:17 AM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom
Get your facts straight. The so called "Assault Weapons Ban" does not cover automatic weapons. With the exception of governmental approval, fully automatic weapons were banned from public ownership in 1934.
239 posted on 01/23/2004 9:12:52 AM PST by kildak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

To: PhiKapMom
Keep whatever you want! I just stated what I believe and don't see the need -- if you do, keep it. I think it is much ado about nothing since the President has not stated he is going to make the AWB harder.

I guess I don't have a right to my opinion without ridicule. Don't think macho types are into milk and cookies either!

My Dad had rifles, shotguns, and I think a handgun but you know what he wasn't macho about it and used them for hunting. Automatic weapons he was not in favor of owning because they could fall in the hands of people not qualified to use them. Guess he should be serving milk and cookies too?

Whatever...some people shouldn't have internet access/an automobile/alcohol/etc either, those things have fallen into the hands of people not qualified to use those things too.

You miss the point...if conservatism is about preserving the Constitution, preserving our freedom, and preserving our rights as free U.S. citizens; an AWB is not the solution to having assult weapons fall into the hands of crimminals (which they already do...and no ban is going to change that anyhow). The solution is to prosecute and punish those who commit a crime with an automatic weapon. Lock them up, send them to the electric chair, have them rot away in prison to suffer the consequences of their actions. Out of all the "reforms" we've been seeing out of this administration (Campaign finance, Medicare, and now immigration) the two that are needed the most, and the two that the Republicans (up to this point) have been soft on, are Tort Rerform and Judicial Reform (i.e. getting judicial vacancies filled, by conservative judges; whatever that means now). Any other solution doesn't cut it...its just a delusional government usurping of power band-aid on an obvious problem. Have criminals suffer for their actions...leave me alone with my right to defend myself and my family. There's nothing "macho" about that, unless you consider preserving and protecting the life of yourself and your loved ones "macho".

240 posted on 01/23/2004 9:13:05 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (Principled conservatives need not apply...we're all centrists now. Shut up & pay your taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson