Skip to comments.
Bush steps up attack on women's rights
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^
| 1/23/04
| CHRISTINE R. CHARBONNEAU
Posted on 01/23/2004 3:50:02 AM PST by ppaul
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: imintrouble
What a great story!
Thanks for sharing it.
BTTT
21
posted on
01/23/2004 5:15:37 AM PST
by
ppaul
To: cpforlife.org
FYI
22
posted on
01/23/2004 5:17:30 AM PST
by
ppaul
To: ppaul
Sure, women have the right to murder their own children because they are inconvienant.
Yea, (censored) right.
I'm waiting for some ACLU type to say that murder is legal since we can kill the pre-born.
23
posted on
01/23/2004 5:31:02 AM PST
by
Maigrey
(Watchin' Rats with the Mute Button ON!)
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: ppaul
Other than killing their babies there are a few other womens rights that need to be revoked.
25
posted on
01/23/2004 5:50:40 AM PST
by
biblewonk
(I must try to answer all bible questions.)
To: ppaul
I hope this writer never does have children --- feminists are too evil to be mothers.
26
posted on
01/23/2004 6:37:01 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: ppaul
They deserve th eright to make their own decisions--I agree
That is why I urge our public schools to teach abstinence.
Never met a woman who became pregnant with her legs closed.
Modern science is beginning to affirm what the writers of
the Bible understood without benefit of modern science--
life begins at conception. This is not a wart--nor a tumor
to be removed with no loss of life. It is a clear violation of the Declaration of Independence declaraiton
of an "unalienable right to Life." And there is NO "womans'
right to choose" seen in th elanguage used in the US Constitution.
To: ppaul
Thank you so much for your nice comments. I had a bit of a cry writing that because I think of all the "beauties" who have never been given the choice. Whenever I see the little one who is now eight years, and listen to her unnerving curiosity about "things", about "people", about how "the world works", and strangely enough watching her savor a huge ice cream cone in the heat of the summer -- I realize what a terrible mistake it would have been to destroy her before she had the opportunity to experience her own life and wisdom.
And unknowingly, the young beauty has taught her mother and yours truly a wonderful lesson about the sanctity of life.
There is a psychological impact on any woman who has an abortion for whatever the reason, and she carries that scar for the rest of her life unless she lacks the ability to be in touch with her conscience.
In the cases now of incest or rape an immediate medical intervention can take place prior to the sperm fertilizing an egg.
Again, abortion is not birth control. It certainly isn't a woman's primary choice.
The first choice should be empowering women (and men's respect for women - which real men have) to allow the decision to be the best and highest for the parents to be and the child to be created. That is our REAL CHOICE!
To: ppaul
Christine R. Charbonneau is CEO/president of Planned Parenthood of Western WashingtonPlanned Parenthood, NOW and NARAL kill more black people in a week than the Ku Klux Klan killed in one hundred years.
29
posted on
01/23/2004 7:36:24 AM PST
by
reg45
To: ppaul
It's hilarious that the leader of the abortion industry (providing baby murder on demand) is allowed to present herself as a champion of "rights" instead of a shill for her industry.
Of course her lies and misrepresentations don't do her article any good, either.
30
posted on
01/23/2004 7:49:07 AM PST
by
jimt
To: ppaul
Women deserve nothing less than the right, respect and freedom to make their own life decisions. Of course without a birth right it will be impossible to guarantee [female] babies any rights.
To: jimt
It's hilarious that the leader of the abortion industry (providing baby murder on demand) is allowed to present herself as a champion of "rights" instead of a shill for her industry. You'd think the anti-capitalist, "tax the rich", left would get it: These abortion mills are in it for the money - and lots of it.
Evil, evil, evil.
32
posted on
01/23/2004 6:10:34 PM PST
by
ppaul
To: ppaul
... a woman's right to choose ... They always forget the 2nd half of that phrase: "... to kill their babies."
If there are any "pro-choice" people on this thread, you obviously are either 1) evil, 2) uninformed, 3) have never touched a pregnant woman's belly, 4) have never had a baby. Sorry for being so crass about it, but I put it in those terms so that you might see your wrongness clearly, and ask the Lord for forgiveness. The "life" side is so clean and right and true....
33
posted on
01/25/2004 6:04:22 AM PST
by
Theo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson