When Bush Loses In November, He Will Have No One To Blame But Himself

Chuck Baldwin Ministries ^ | 01-23-04 | Baldwin, Chuck

[Theodore R.]

When Bush Loses In November, He Will Have No One To Blame But Himself

By Chuck Baldwin

Food For Thought From The Chuck Wagon

January 23, 2004 Let me be the first one to say it: President Bush is on track to lose in November, and it won't matter who his Democratic opponent is. His fabrications, deceptions, and prevarications are just too much to stomach. His duplicity rivals anything in the previous administration, a Republican name plate notwithstanding.

It's hard to think of anything this president has done right. His policies are every bit as socialist (or fascist) as the most liberal Democrat. We have lost more freedoms during the last three years than we had lost during the previous thirty! Even though Bush has enjoyed Republican majorities in both houses of Congress, neither conservatives nor constitutionalists can point to a single victory Bush has given them. Not one!

Babies are still being aborted at an escalating rate. The Bush administration has done as much (or more) to promote the homosexual agenda as any Democrat. Bush has proliferated the growth of federal spending and corresponding federal deficits to levels not seen in decades. Furthermore, he has created the embryo of a giant Orwellian police state while at the same time offering amnesty and legitimacy to foreign criminals who have invaded our country. If all of that isn't bad enough, Bush even threw his support behind the Clinton gun ban!

Due to Bush's dismal record, the Democratic nominee (whoever he is) will have to work at losing this election. The facade of a "wartime" president is wearing thin. Moreover, gas and oil prices have skyrocketed since oilmen Bush and Cheney rode into Washington, D.C. In addition, without a willingness to cut spending, Bush's tax cuts are a fraud! And now Bush wants to spend an additional billion dollars annually (where this money is coming from nobody knows) to send men to Mars. Get real!

Beyond that, Bush has repeatedly stated that his war against Iraq was fought for the purpose of "enforcing the demands of the United Nations." Now, isn't that lovely? Does he really expect us to re-elect him President of these United States after hearing that he ordered more than 500 brave, patriotic Americans to die in Iraq on behalf of the UN? Does he think we are a bunch of morons? He must.

G.W. Bush deserves to be a one-term president. And the truth is, the nation won't be worse off with a Democratic replacement. At least with a Democrat in the White House, Republicans in Congress might decide to actually oppose liberal policies.

With a liberal Democrat in the White House, a president might get 40% of his agenda through Congress. Bush, on the other hand, will get 80% of his policies through Congress, and Bush's policies are every bit as bad as any liberal Democrat's. So, you tell me who is actually "the lesser of two evils."

(If you would like to track the ongoing Bush record, go to http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/bushrecord.html.)

Therefore, when Bush loses in November, he will have no one to blame but himself.

© Chuck Baldwin

[BigSkyFreeper]

That asshole is "the base":

[socal_parrot]

I didn't agree with Arnold Schwarzenwhoozit and everything he stand for. A lot of people who voted for him didn't either. I voted for the candidate who thinks the closest to me and has the best chance of winning. If all who didn't agree with 100% of Arnold didn't vote for him, we would still be talking about Gov. Davis or worse yet, Gov. BustaMEChA.

Republicans who stay home or vote for a third party rather than Bush only serve to elect a Dem.

[sinkspur]

I didn't vote for him before. Because of principle, I can't vote for him this time either. Tancredo will be a write-in candidate on my ballot.

Figures. You're votin' for a guy who will vote for Bush.

[deport]

I have been looking into the Constitution Party and it has been a tough time getting info or insight.

---

Maybe they aren't wanting to disclose they have a candidate by the name of "Clymer" running for VP.....

[suzyq5558]

since his entire mission in life seems to be to trash George W. Bush.

Ive had that impression of Mr.Baldwin for a long time now. and he seems to have gone over the edge like dem party.

[Cultural Jihad]

The democrats are going to pull out the stops to mobilize their voters like you've never seen. They're not going to be the sit-at-home, unmotivated individuals you saw in 2000.

And we're probably seeing all that Soros' money can buy right here on the 'UberConservative' threads of FR.

[The KG9 Kid]

This guy is a smiling face for the KKK.

No thanks.

[BigSkyFreeper]

I can't believe anyone would believe he's as credible as he seems. He trashed Bush on 9/11 when the rest of the country came together as one.

[sinkspur]

I've got a shiny 1999 Caymen Islands quarter (I guess it's a quarter - it says "25" on it) that says he loses. I've been dying to unload it, but have never been able to. I'm willing to wager it.

I've got a Benjamin Franklin here that says you're wrong. That's $100.

Well? Feelin' lucky, punk?

[Cicero]

This is nuts. George W. Bush is no more responsible for the continuing legalization of abortion than Chuck Baldwin. He has done what he can.

[Theodore R.]

Did Bush sign the spending for Planned Parenthood -- was it $250 million or thereabout?

[dighton]

Baldwin is working for the Constitution Party. He should disclose that in every column.

Is this true?

Yes. Baldwin's mug is on their homepage, and has been for quite some time.

[CougarGA7]

Because it hasn't. My life is no different today than it was before the Patriot Act was enacted.

I never have had anything to hide.

[Dead Corpse]

Well, I sure as hell can't vote Libertarian this time around now can I? They've all tossed the baby out with the bathwater over the Iraq War. That is one bridge that party can NEVER rebuild with me.

RLC members for candidates are about all I got left.

[luvbach1]

Dems would have no problem with most the "deficiencies" enumerated, and rarely mention them. They think Bush is far right conservative and they want to move the country in the opposite direction. Don't laugh, you know that's what they say.

[BigSkyFreeper]

Yes, it's true, Baldwin is part of the enemy within.

[Theodore R.]

Bush's remarks on abortion sound encouraging. Do you think that he will nevertheless name a pro-abortion Supreme Court justice as did his father with David Souter?

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

That asshole is "the base"

He no doubt thinks so. Of course, he also thoughtfully examined whether GWB was the antichrist, if I remember correctly.

Some "base".

[truth_seeker]

"G.W. Bush deserves to be a one-term president. And the truth is, the nation won't be worse off with a Democratic replacement."

What you get is Bush or a Democrat. Those are the ONLY two available options.

People who don't understand that waste a lot of time, bemoaning same.

I don't want any of the democrats in charge of national security.

[Paul Atreides]

I just wish that the people who think that the President should think 100% like they do just run for the office themselves. That way, they can throw away their votes for even more of a principled reason.