[God is good]

I think the Democrat's main objection was that the Republican's did not spend enough. Maybe the Dems wised up when they realized they can spend more under Bush and the Republican congress than they could under a Democrat President. I hope the Republican's lose the majority in the Senate. Then maybe we'll have gridlock and less spending.

Bush made a promise to the American people to practice fiscal responsibility. He's a liar just like Clinton.

[johnb838]

The rats figure they can have it both ways now. Spend like sailors and then blame Booosh (and Halliburton) for being big spenders. It will backfire on them in the end.

[jgrubbs]

The omnibus bill containing seven of the 13 spending bills that fund the federal government is under fire from conservatives for increasing spending at a time of record deficits.

Democrats also are rallying against the bill because it fails to stop a new regulation that would take away overtime eligibility for millions of private-sector workers and because it would loosen rules on the concentration of media ownership of television stations.

[okie01]

"I hope the Republican's lose the majority in the Senate. Then maybe we'll have gridlock and less spending."

And more liberal, activist judges.

Is that what you want?

[m1-lightning]

I hope the Republican's lose the majority in the Senate. Then maybe we'll have gridlock and less spending.

Less spending toward conservative issues, you mean. The reason Democrats spend so much is because they 'buy their votes'. My governor has bitched about the Republicans in our state spending so much and has limited what they can spend but yet he holds no restrictions for money spent towards the gay community and labor unions.