Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
Clearly my litmus test correctly identifies President Bush as someone who will sign legislation to ban abortion.

As you said, he will clearly also sign legislation abridging free speech, as the CFR does. He is not conservative, a conservative conserves the Constitution. He clearly will not do that. He clearly is not upholding his oath of office. I call for his impeachment.
858 posted on 01/22/2004 11:28:08 AM PST by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies ]


To: Final Authority
LOL!
860 posted on 01/22/2004 11:29:29 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]

To: Final Authority
ROFLOL!!!!!
863 posted on 01/22/2004 11:30:14 AM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]

To: Final Authority
Bush signed CFR, and that was an egregious error.

But, I think he was victim of a series of political miscalculations.

I believe Bush made a deal with McCain, because McCain has not criticized Bush or his administration since the ink was dry on CFR.

I think Dubya said, 'John, if you can get that bill to my desk, I'll sign it, provided you never speak against me again.'

Bush didn't believe McCain could get that bill through a Republican Congress, but he did - and Dubya had to keep his word.

And, I don't think the Republican Congress thought Bush would ever sign the bill if it got to his desk.

The next miscalculation was Bush believing the SCOTUS would overturn the law on Constitutional grounds - but, they didn't !!

884 posted on 01/22/2004 11:37:08 AM PST by skip2myloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]

To: Final Authority
"As you said, he will clearly also sign legislation abridging free speech, as the CFR does. He is not conservative, a conservative conserves the Constitution. He clearly will not do that. He clearly is not upholding his oath of office. I call for his impeachment."

No, I didn't say that Bush would abridge free speech, and neither did the Supreme Court say that, though if you have an issue with CFR you might start *there* since they are supposed to be the watchdog for such things (or does that not advance your petty little agenda as much as directly bashing Bush per your handlers' instructions)?!

But just to chap both you and your activist friends, if you do somehow manage Bush's impeachment, please note that I will be smoking a fine stogie with President Dick Cheney, laughing our arses off at fools such as yourself who would engage in radical fringe activities such as calling for Bush's impeachment that wouldn't even advance your anti-Republican agenda in the slightest.

885 posted on 01/22/2004 11:37:15 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]

To: Final Authority
I call for his impeachment

I was more-or-less with you up until there. Sorry FRiend, but that's just loony.
906 posted on 01/22/2004 11:45:07 AM PST by BJClinton (Vote Democrat, it's easier than thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson