"The party is NOT broken, much to your dismay, I am sure. 91% support this president and his policies."
Do 91% of the Republican party support this president? Yes, his source showed that. AP and FoxNews has it 86-89% now.
Now to the part your atrophied grey cell is having a difficult time understanding: "91% support this president and his policies." A general statement of the support. Of course they support his policies if they approve of his job - if they hated his policies, they wouldn't approve."
Next, the article goes from general to specific. Policy A has x% support, policy B has y%.
No where was it said or implied that 91% supported 91% of his policies or 91% supported 100%.
It is a general point followed by specific points. It's how you write an article.
The fairy tale or straw man was yours. In your rabid desire to discredit anything Bush, you set up a false premise and demanded proof for something you knew was false and then accused Howlin of deceit when he failed to prove your false premise.
Perhaps you initially misread - or you were being intellectually dishonest as he responded.
Try to read through your optorectumosis.