Skip to comments.
So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^
| 1/22/04
Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: Keith
He can certainly encourage the state legislature to impeach. Plus, there's an even bigger problem at the federal level that needs to be addressed.
961
posted on
01/22/2004 12:06:35 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
("I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid"-Qadafi)
To: ohioWfan
Read the post you replied to and try again.
962
posted on
01/22/2004 12:07:33 PM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
To: Wolfstar
Great post!
Great President!
To: exmarine; zook
This is "Free Republic" remember? Maybe you would be more comfortable starting your own website - might I suggest some titles: "Communist Dictatorship", "Thought Police Central", "Beserkly University"... Maybe you could try that line on Jim Robinson or the Admin Moderator. Go ahead...e-mail them and see if you can shut someone up because you don't like what they have to say.Jim Robinson did exactly that in 2000. He banished a large number of Brigadiers for advocating just what you propose.
964
posted on
01/22/2004 12:08:06 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
To: thoughtomator
I would rather we impeach the five justices who upheld CFR.
To: My2Cents; Old_Professor
The Dems in the Senate, plus Lincoln Chaffee, Olympia Snowe, and Chuck Hagel, represent a non-conservative majority. Re-elect Bush, and put about 6 more Republicans (primarily from the open Southern seats) in the Senate, and let's see what happens in the next four years.
Please don't list Hagel in the same breath with those others.
Nebraska, despite being an all-Red state, has its little tradition of producing prairie radicals and cranks independent thinkers. Hagel fits the pattern. You might feel better if you realize that the Dims hate Hagel's junior senator, Ben Nelson, just as much as you apparently hate Hagel. Personally, I blame George Norris and William Jennings Bryant. My dad and grandfather did too.
Hagel used to be reliably rightwing when he associated more with Helms. But every now and then, when the rest of the current GOP stumbles into idiocy, he takes the proper stand on an important policy question. But even a blind squirrel occasionally finds an acorn...
To: ohioWfan
As I have said before it does not matter. I live in TX. If Bush is in danger of losing this state he has lost half the south, all the northeast and the dems have made inroads in the west. If Bush absolutely needs every possible vote in TX he has already lost the election.
967
posted on
01/22/2004 12:09:05 PM PST
by
RiflemanSharpe
(An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
To: skip2myloo
The biggest obstacle to getting more conservative bills to the President's desk is the United States Senate. The Dems and Republican moderates outnumber the conservatives by a comfortable margin. We've got a long way to go before that situation will change, if it ever does. You're right that electing more conservative representatives would help, because the House is the place where conservatives can have a very real impact on national policy.
968
posted on
01/22/2004 12:09:54 PM PST
by
Wolfstar
(George W. Bush — the 1st truly great world leader of the 21st Century)
To: BJClinton
"Now, back to our debate about fiscal conservatism, you seemed to avoid the fact that being a true fiscal conservative is the real litmus test."With all due respect, I didn't avoid your "true fiscal conservative" litmus test. In fact, I pointed out that liberal, radical pro-abortion Presidential candidates such as former Governor Howard Dean would score higher on your "true fiscal conservative" test than would those conservatives among us who would sign legislative bans on abortion, sign tax cuts into law, withdraw from the U.S. - CCCP ABM treaty, kill the Kyoto Global Warming nonsense, diss the International Criminal Court, cut rubbish regulations like co2 &logging firebreak restrictions, etc.
In other words, what you are asking for, i.e. fiscal conservatism, is something that could be found just as easily in a liberal pro-abortion, anti-defense candidate as in a pro-life, pro-defense President.
So your key litmus test has nothing to do with Conservatism per se...
969
posted on
01/22/2004 12:10:25 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Mo1
The gay guys that took Texas' sodomy law to the USSC.
970
posted on
01/22/2004 12:10:50 PM PST
by
looscnnn
("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
To: exmarine
What other president went to Mexico and addressed the crowd with "fellow citizens of the world"? You get globalist from that? A polite greeting - a variant that every president uses.
With your reasoning, JFK was stating his desire to bring back the Third Reich or Nixon was a Chinese agent or even worse, Reagan was working to establish the Workers Paradise!
To: BureaucratusMaximus
Go third party, like myself you can not hurt Bush. But we may wake him up.
972
posted on
01/22/2004 12:10:56 PM PST
by
RiflemanSharpe
(An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
To: Bikers4Bush
If he uses an executive order to institute the illegal proposal (as a senators aid said he is planning to do)Utter rubbish.
973
posted on
01/22/2004 12:11:33 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Diddle E. Squat
Nice try. No cigar.
To: My2Cents
It's only upsetting in that it doesn't belong here and does more to divide conservatives than honest disagreements about policy.
Believe me, once I log off today I won't give it a second thought.
975
posted on
01/22/2004 12:11:43 PM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
To: Your Nightmare
Bush promised to run based on Education and Health issues. It seems that he kept his promise.
976
posted on
01/22/2004 12:12:23 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Poohbah
He banished a large number of Brigadiers for advocating just what you propose Actually there where and are only seven of them. They just have a variety of screen names and accounts as their disposal in an organized attempt to smear the omnipotent leader.
977
posted on
01/22/2004 12:12:23 PM PST
by
riri
To: exmarine
"Religious Freedom is already being assaulted by courts (while the spineless jellyfish of a GOP sits on their hands!). Ever hear of the Constitution - the exclusions clause (Art. 3, sec. 2). Congress has the authority and power to limit the courts jurisdiction on a number of issues - yet they don't do it. Why?"Congress and its actions/inactions might be just a wee bit beyond what one can reasonable expect in scope from our President...
978
posted on
01/22/2004 12:12:40 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: looscnnn
The gay guys that took Texas' sodomy law to the USSC. So you are saying that Bush was is favor of them?
979
posted on
01/22/2004 12:13:21 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: Wolfstar
When I say Congress, I use the generic term meaning the whole of Congress which includes BOTH houses.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson