Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,901-1,9201,921-1,9401,941-1,960 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: blackie
He'll be re-elected in a landslide.

I agree, he'll be re-elected in a landside.....
but, no money or vote from me this time.

1,921 posted on 01/24/2004 6:32:48 PM PST by RightWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1901 | View Replies]

To: zook
You're one of the few people who knows how to correctly spell "loses". You must have gone to some good schools.
1,922 posted on 01/24/2004 6:35:09 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1920 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
I may not, but if I am unable too, we will both be losers, and so will this great country.! The only reason the left has any fight left in them is because they have the Judges. They know this, and they are using them like no other time in our history. We get the Judges, we've got their jugular.!!!
1,923 posted on 01/24/2004 6:39:45 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1919 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
You're only fooling yourself. Your numbers aren't swelling anywhere.

The teens and young adults of America are far more Conservatives than their parents' generation and wonders of wonders, are supporting President Bush in record numbers.

1,924 posted on 01/24/2004 6:39:57 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1916 | View Replies]

To: zook
I doubt that it will be a landslide, but we MUST all work to help re-elect President Bush, as though our lives depend on it, because they do .
1,925 posted on 01/24/2004 6:42:32 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1920 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
I live in TX. If GWB is in danger of losing TX he has already lost to many other states to have chance of winning.

(grin) Yeah, I've in a state far Redder than Texas. Like you, I have the luxury of principled dissent without consequence.

Well, no one can say we're not honest about it.
1,926 posted on 01/24/2004 6:48:14 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1910 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
Well, I think I did, though I can't say excellent spelling is my forte. (or is that "fortay?")
1,927 posted on 01/24/2004 6:49:49 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1922 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
You're one of the few people who knows how to correctly spell "loses". You must have gone to some good schools.

He can spell 'loses' but not 'smithereens'. Look back on the thread for other examples.
1,928 posted on 01/24/2004 6:50:53 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1922 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
"The teens and young adults of America are far more Conservatives than their parents' generation and wonders of wonders, are supporting President Bush in record numbers."

Last I heard they were still watching MTV, playing video games and smoking their 420 or whatever they call dope these days. Most of 'em couldn't even tell you which country we fought to gain our independence, and haven't a foggiest clue what the 2nd Amendment is.

1,929 posted on 01/24/2004 6:52:04 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1924 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
I don't know what you're reading, but it certainly hasn't been FR lately.

And, 20 and early 30 somethings aren't watching MYV, smoking dope, and playing video games...are they ? The ones I know aren't and the ones going to CPAC aren't and the ones in the recently posted articles aren't either.

1,930 posted on 01/24/2004 7:06:40 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1929 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I don't much care. Enjoy your wallow .Change your screen name to John Kerry or something like that. You are far too narrow in your thinking.
Have fun on LP.
1,931 posted on 01/24/2004 8:14:43 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1898 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Your 'response' was five unrelated sentences, posing as a paragraph. And it didn't address that I exposed your previous clumsy dissimulation about Tancredo and Bush's attempt to pre-empt Congress on the amnesty issue.

Perhaps incoherence really is your strongest possible argument at this point, given the collapse of your premise.
1,932 posted on 01/24/2004 8:57:15 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1931 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
You did not expose or address anything,except you own irrelevance. You are not even smart enough to understand you are dismissed. As stated, get a new screen name ,like intellectually dishonest paranoid. Go away, you're a pimple no longer worthy of merit. Do you understand that? It's a simple concept, even a tin foil hat wearer like you can understand that concept,hopefully.

Let me know whrn the illegals over run your neighborhood so I can go hire a few. I have some yard work and housepainting needing attention.

1,933 posted on 01/24/2004 9:44:05 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1932 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
You did not expose or address anything,except you own irrelevance. You are not even smart enough to understand you are dismissed. As stated, get a new screen name ,like intellectually dishonest paranoid. Go away, you're a pimple no longer worthy of merit. Do you understand that? It's a simple concept, even a tin foil hat wearer like you can understand that concept,hopefully.

Let me know when the illegals over run your neighborhood so I can go hire a few. I have some yard work and house painting needing attention.

1,934 posted on 01/24/2004 9:44:23 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1932 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Tancredo is supporting the president.

And your screen name is an INSULT !

1,935 posted on 01/24/2004 9:45:58 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1932 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Drat, I do so hate the dreaded double post.
1,936 posted on 01/24/2004 9:46:00 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1934 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
You are not even smart enough to understand you are dismissed.

Dismissed? What are you, the queen of England?

I notice you can offer only insults now that your argument has crumbled.
1,937 posted on 01/24/2004 10:56:27 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1934 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Tancredo is supporting the president.

For re-election? No doubt. He's a practical party man.

Supporting Bush's don't-call-it-amnesty plan? Not a chance. Who is sticking the biggest knife in it? Tancredo.

Try to keep up. We just had a fresh thread on it, Hastert mentioning that his introductions of immigration reform legislation are stillborn because of opposition. Here's a clue: Hastert is not referring to the opposition of Dimocrat congressmen.
1,938 posted on 01/24/2004 11:07:23 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1935 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; Cincinatus' Wife; All
From another thread, think about it - you really want to give any of these liberals these slightest chance in hell of getting to the White House (or to the Senate for that matter) ??

The danger is palpable

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1064775/posts

Excerpt from Hillary Clinton and the Radical Left Hillary Clinton and the Third Way***For these self-appointed social redeemers, the goal-"social justice"-is not about rectifying particular injustices, which would be practical and modest, and therefore conservative. Their crusade is about rectifying injustice in the very order of things. "Social Justice" for them is about a world reborn, a world in which prejudice and violence are absent, in which everyone is equal and equally advantaged and without fundamentally conflicting desires. It is a world that could only come into being through a re-structuring of human nature and of society itself.

Even though they are too prudent and self-protective to name this future anymore, the post-Communist left still passionately believes it possible. But it is a world that has never existed and never will. Moreover, as the gulags and graveyards of the last century attest, to attempt the impossible is to invite the catastrophic in the world we know.

But the fall of Communism taught the progressives who were its supporters very little. Above all, it failed to teach them the connection between their Utopian ideals and the destructive consequences that flowed from them. The fall of Communism has had a cautionary impact only on the overt agendas of the political left. The arrogance that drives them has hardly diminished. The left is like a millenarian sect that erroneously predicted the end of the world, and now must regroup to revitalize its faith.

No matter how opportunistically the left's agendas have been modified, however, no matter how circumspectly its goals have been set, no matter how generous its concessions to political reality, the faithful have not given up their self-justifying belief that they can bring about a social redemption. In other words, a world in which human consciousness is changed, human relations refashioned, social institutions transformed, and in which "social justice" prevails.***

17 posted on 01/25/2004 3:40:41 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

1,939 posted on 01/25/2004 4:00:51 AM PST by skip2myloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1925 | View Replies]

To: skip2myloo
They never stop.
1,940 posted on 01/25/2004 5:16:18 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1939 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,901-1,9201,921-1,9401,941-1,960 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson