Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,881-1,9001,901-1,9201,921-1,940 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: Godebert
I got that you don't like GWB ~ he needs no defense and I will not play your childish games.

He'll be re-elected in a landslide.

Enjoy your misery!
1,901 posted on 01/24/2004 4:17:39 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1900 | View Replies]

To: blackie
What's amusing is that I'm asking valid political questions while you're the one just playing the "childish games". Why don't you just answer the questions? Is the truth too painful for you to handle?

1. Did George Bush place his hand on the Holy Bible and swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America?

2. Did George Bush say he thought the McCain/Feingold Campaign Finance legislation was un-Constitutional?

3. Did George Bush then sign that legislation into law abridging our 1st Amendment rights?

4. Did George Bush keep his word and uphold his sworn oath?

We're all waiting for your answers.

1,902 posted on 01/24/2004 4:36:54 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1901 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn
Uh, I forgot. Tried to look up your question so I could answer it and oops, no luck. Maybe one of us will figure it out.
1,903 posted on 01/24/2004 4:42:22 PM PST by Marysecretary (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1878 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
I got that you don't like GWB ~ he needs no defense and I will not play your childish games.

He'll be re-elected in a landslide.

Enjoy your misery!

Psssst ~ you .05% third party fringees are hilarious.

I'll be voting for GWB ~ who will you be voting for? :)

1,904 posted on 01/24/2004 5:32:14 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1902 | View Replies]

To: blackie
I am leaning toward the Constitution Party. GWB is just to liberal for me.
1,905 posted on 01/24/2004 5:35:48 PM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1904 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
Howard Phillips (if he runs again) is good man ~ I met him in '00 in Jarbidge, NV when we opened a road that Clintoon had closed.

He isn't electable, though.
1,906 posted on 01/24/2004 5:39:21 PM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1905 | View Replies]

To: blackie
A vote is not ever wasted if you vote for who you think is the best. And secondly, how can we truly get conservative elected if we continue to vote for the lessor of two evils not matter how liberal they are. If we start a shift to the right the GOP will follow.
1,907 posted on 01/24/2004 5:42:33 PM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1906 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
I expect all third parties to suffer decline in participation in '04. Libertarian, Constitution, Greens, Reform (hahaha), you name it.

The political dynamic doesn't favor the emergence of a new party. Neither major party is weak enough. And the American system works against the viability of more than two parties, unlike parliamentary democracies who always spawn more than two.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to discourage you. But you have to be realistic. To be honest, I think the only way we will see one of these parties rise in prominence is if they first elect local officials and send reps to Congress.

Hey, it's possible. Isn't it Vermont that has that socialist (so-called independent) in Congress? So, if a blatant Red can get elected to Congress, it's not beyond the realm of possibility that any one of the third parties could do the same.

And there are also practical demographics to consider. Any of these third parties could devise a strategy to concentrate their efforts overwhelmingly on some of the rural states. These would be states like the Dakotas, Montana, Wyoming, etc. They would offer the best possibility of electing local officials and congressmen. You'd have to be determined and in it for the long haul but it could be done. The same way the granola-crunchers invaded Vermont twenty years ago and have kept the socialist Saunders in Congress now for, what, 10 years or more.
1,908 posted on 01/24/2004 5:50:40 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1905 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
President Bush is on record as saying " I feel some sections of this Bill are unconstitutional" If you want to make a point, at least keep your facts straight. You are venting your anger over this, against President Bush and I have never heard one thing from you about the ruling of the SCOTUS. on this issue. While I disagree with their decision, it makes your argument moot, for as it stands, the CFR law is constitutional.!!
1,909 posted on 01/24/2004 5:52:31 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1902 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I think you are right. But I will vote my conscience anyway. I can no longer stomach holding my nose while voting. Besides for me it does not matter. I live in TX. If GWB is in danger of losing TX he has already lost to many other states to have chance of winning.
1,910 posted on 01/24/2004 5:54:38 PM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1908 | View Replies]

To: blackie
" Psssst ~ you .05% third party fringees are hilarious. I'll be voting for GWB ~ who will you be voting for? :)"

Well....I won't be voting for any politician that signed mCLame/feinGold and supports banning semi-automatic rifles.

1,911 posted on 01/24/2004 5:57:59 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1904 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
"You are venting your anger over this, against President Bush and I have never heard one thing from you about the ruling of the SCOTUS. on this issue. While I disagree with their decision, it makes your argument moot, for as it stands, the CFR law is constitutional.!!

Ya....it's Constitutional according to the five leftist justices. The same five that would probably say a complete ban on all civilian ownership of firearms is Constitutional. Besides....we expect the leftist scum to crap on our rights....but Bush is the one who handed them the Constitution to use as toilet paper.

1,912 posted on 01/24/2004 6:07:21 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1909 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
If we start a shift to the right the GOP will followYour 2% of the vote will start a shift to the right? Naivete at best! Ask the primary voters who voted and nominated Barry Goldwater, what they think now?(hint: I am one of them) The only way to hold power, and too advance any part of one's agenda in this country, is to get elected.

The LP party voter's in SD cost Thune the election, even though their candidate dropped out and endorsed Thune. Three thousand still voted for him, and Thune lost the election by just 527 votes. I am sure these voters at least, like their tax cuts.!!<sarcasm

1,913 posted on 01/24/2004 6:12:06 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1907 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
You may be right but in the Presidents election my vote does not count. I will of course vote Rep down ticket. They are the most Conservative.
1,914 posted on 01/24/2004 6:14:02 PM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1913 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
we expect the leftist scum to crap on our rights

I have no disagreement with your right to disagree on an issue, but you will not help yourself or this country by being a 2%,

1,915 posted on 01/24/2004 6:18:04 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1912 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
Well...we don't plan on staying at 2%. Our numbers are swelling every day as Bush continues his march to the left.
1,916 posted on 01/24/2004 6:21:25 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1915 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
I will of course vote Rep down ticket. They are the most Conservative.

Glad to know you are voting in Texas. President Bush will now go from 64.000000000234% to64.0000000000233% of the vote.

1,917 posted on 01/24/2004 6:23:28 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1914 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
Our numbers are swelling every day as Bush continues his march to the left.

I do not care how old you are Godebert, you will not live long enough to see 5%...LOL

1,918 posted on 01/24/2004 6:26:50 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1916 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
You might not being typing "lol" this November.
1,919 posted on 01/24/2004 6:29:56 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1918 | View Replies]

To: blackie
"He'll be re-elected in a landslide. "

Man, I hope you're right. I've been pretty confident. But I see so many people on FR with their heads in a real dark wet place.

More than ever, if Bush loses, America loses.
1,920 posted on 01/24/2004 6:30:00 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1896 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,881-1,9001,901-1,9201,921-1,940 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson