Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: Texasforever
Please crawl back under your rock. Thank you.
1,661 posted on 01/23/2004 2:43:16 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Death is certain; little chance of success; what are we waiting for???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1660 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Please crawl back under your rock. Thank you.

You are already sucking on it so no thanks.

1,662 posted on 01/23/2004 2:45:44 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1661 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
What's the matter? Can't stand that some conservatives are unwilling to put up with all the Bushit? Can't stand that some people aren't falling in behind you?

What's the matter? Are you so intellectually void you failed to notice sarcasm? What's the matter? Are you so wrapped into your childish "righteousness that you failed to notice you are being held in utter contempt? What's the matter? Are you so guilty about your wrongheadedness , you cannot admit someone else just might be right? What's the matter? Are you so lacking in cognitive thinking skills you have to immerse yourself in middle school histrionics? Bah,you are an oxygen thief.

1,663 posted on 01/23/2004 3:04:15 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1649 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Texasforever
If you say so, Bush-lover. By the way, I find it so sweet the way you're taking up for gatorbait. Why is it that you all are so thin-skinned and bent out of shape over some conservatives making a principled choice to vote third party? Are you all really that controlling?

Is your career as a professional seventh grader so taxing that you must resort to poorly reasoned innuendo? You remain an oxygen thief.

1,664 posted on 01/23/2004 3:06:51 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1656 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Texasforever
No nitwit. Gator and I were at each other's throat last night On this subject? I doubt it; you both seem pro-Bush.

Far better that, than being pro-loser .Enjoy your growing marginalization,Rocks.

1,665 posted on 01/23/2004 3:12:48 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1659 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
Hey,dc , how goes it? Things are quiet here, market kind of sagged a little with Kerry's unexpectedly good showing in Iowa, but I except them to stabilise.

Anyway, nice seeing you again.
1,666 posted on 01/23/2004 3:20:00 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1616 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Instead, he cuddled up with the Brady Bunch on the AWB.

He has done this how?

1,667 posted on 01/23/2004 3:23:17 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1639 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Yeah, that's the same one. I've already conceded two points, one he went way downhill toward the end, and two - my memory is somewhat diminished :-)

Don't beat me up too badly, please.

Still, at one time most folks considered him a firebrand conservative - even with my advancing dementia, I'll never forget that mushroom cloud ad.

Wanna beat me up about Dirksen too ??

1,668 posted on 01/23/2004 3:23:44 AM PST by skip2myloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1650 | View Replies]

To: skip2myloo
Still, at one time most folks considered him a firebrand conservative - even with my advancing dementia, I'll never forget that mushroom cloud ad.

God,Skip,we're both (ahem) old ! I remember that particularly nasty hit vividly. Lyndon only had to run it once. Goldwater was a firebrand then, but ,it seemed after being destroyed in 64, he sort of became lost.

Why did you have to go and remind me about that ad? Now my joints ache.

Enjoyed the spar, more later? :- )

1,669 posted on 01/23/2004 3:31:22 AM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1668 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Despite the source, its a good read, -- offers sage warning to those unwilling to compromise, from either side of the aisle.

From DU - [excerpt] The Goldwater Syndrome

November 16, 2002

By Mike McArdle

In your heart you know he’s right. — 1964 Barry Goldwater campaign slogan

In 1960 the Republican Party lost an extremely close election. After 8 years of the party holding the White House a sitting Vice President was defeated by a narrow and disputed margin. Many in the party insisted for years afterward that the election had been stolen. In the mid term elections in 1962 the President campaigned hard for his party’s candidates in spite of an international crisis that dominated the Fall headlines and partly as a result the Democrats gained Senate seats to the further disappointment of the Republicans.

Does any of this sound familiar?

There is a catastrophic mistake that parties make every once in a while and it always results in an electoral disaster. The reasoning that leads to the disaster goes something like this and it comes from one frustrated wing of the Party:

The worst mistake any party can make is to conclude that the way to electoral success is to seek ideological purity and drive from the party those who are diluting your message. In the wake of a close, disappointing loss it’s easy to look for scapegoats and point fingers but it’s a catastrophic political strategy. It can euphemistically hide behind words like “our core voters stayed home” or “we need to motivate the base” but it’s still the Goldwater syndrome.

Barry Goldwater enunciated the “we lose because conservatives fail to vote” theme in a speech to the 1960 Republican Convention. It made him a hero to the growing conservative western base of the Republican Party. Barry got a further boost when the party’s most prominent eastern moderate contender, New York governor Nelson Rockefeller, left his wife for a younger woman. When the politically astute Richard Nixon decided to defer another Presidential run the path was clear for Barry’s fanatically dedicated followers to propel him to the nomination.

Barry believed in an aggressive approach to confronting communism backed by military force whenever necessary. He wanted to give tactical commanders the right to use nuclear weapons if they saw fit. He wanted to drastically cut back on government programs and proposed selling the Tennessee Valley Authority. He even suggested making Social Security optional. A staunch believer in states rights Barry voted against the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964.

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."

— famous line from Goldwater's acceptance speech.

That line brought down the house at the Republican convention but it scared the daylights out of millions of voters. The Democrats found it easy to paint Barry as a maniac who could easily bring on a nuclear confrontation, a thought that a horrified a nation that had lived through the Cuban missile crisis only two years earlier.

The Democrats gleefully produced a “Go with Goldwater” button that featured a mushroom cloud and created one of the most famous negative TV ads in campaigning history. A pretty little girl holds a flower in the middle of a field as a narrator in the background intones a countdown. As the countdown reaches zero the little girl and the field are obliterated by a mushroom cloud. The Democrats apologized but only after the networks ran the controversial ad over and over.

In your guts you know he’s nuts. — Democratic parody of the Goldwater slogan.

1,670 posted on 01/23/2004 4:37:55 AM PST by skip2myloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1669 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Selective reading, and a bit of revisionist history.

Whether the rest of the people in here wish to believe spin instead of the plain facts is not my problem, the fact that you just notified me that you are in government t at one level or another, and that you blame GW Bush for being responsible for ending your career makes you suspect.

That was the head of the Budget committee (D) crediting a Republican with taking actions to bring about a balanced budget, and a newspaper article acknowledging the fact that Bush paid a high political price for his part.

The Dims cut the budget BEFORE Gingrich led the Senate...but, as a politician, you're not one to let facts get in the way of spin.

This guy was giving Bush I credit while standing in a Democrat celebration of a balanced budget with Clinton taking credit for achieving it.

I guess Democrats always praise Republicans and give them credit for things other Democrats are trying to take credit for.

What an evil man!

Yeah, right....

1,671 posted on 01/23/2004 5:19:16 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1635 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I NEVER voted for a Democrat, in a national election. I voted for Reagan, Reagan, Bush I, Perot (at this point I take some responsibility of electing Clinton), Dole, Bush II. I only wish there was a Republican running this time.
1,672 posted on 01/23/2004 5:21:52 AM PST by LandofLincoln ((the right has become the left))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1518 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
OK...let's limit the parameters of my post to the last twenty years, before that, expenditures during wartimes outpaced Bush's under wartime.

We are HARDLY at war.

1,673 posted on 01/23/2004 5:23:07 AM PST by LandofLincoln ((the right has become the left))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1518 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
"They have voted against Bush's conservative policies for much of the last session and those prior."

They are called RINOs. In no way is Bush a conservative nor is any one of the individuals that grow government and stand for Liberal policies.

I keep watching Lieberman and I am hard pressed to find a difference between GWB and Lieberman. They seem like the same candidate to me.
1,674 posted on 01/23/2004 5:40:51 AM PST by CSM (Council member Carol Schwartz (R.-at large), my new hero! The Anti anti Smoke Gnatzie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1384 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
How' that?

Executive Order Establishing Office of Homeland Security
Executive Order
Establishing the Office of Homeland Security and the Homeland Security Council




By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Establishment. I hereby establish within the Executive Office of the President an Office of Homeland Security (the "Office") to be headed by the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security.

Sec. 2. Mission. The mission of the Office shall be to develop and coordinate the implementation of a comprehensive national strategy to secure the United States from terrorist threats or attacks. The Office shall perform the functions necessary to carry out this mission, including the functions specified in section 3 of this order.

Sec. 3. Functions. The functions of the Office shall be to coordinate the executive branch's efforts to detect, prepare for, prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks within the United States.

(a) National Strategy. The Office shall work with executive departments and agencies, State and local governments, and private entities to ensure the adequacy of the national strategy for detecting, preparing for, preventing, protecting against, responding to, and recovering from terrorist threats or attacks within the United States and shall periodically review and coordinate revisions to that strategy as necessary.

(b) Detection. The Office shall identify priorities and coordinate efforts for collection and analysis of information within the United States regarding threats of terrorism against the United States and activities of terrorists or terrorist groups within the United States. The Office also shall identify, in coordination with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, priorities for collection of intelligence outside the United States regarding threats of terrorism within the United States.

(i) In performing these functions, the Office shall work with Federal, State, and local agencies, as appropriate, to:

(A) facilitate collection from State and local governments and private entities of information pertaining to terrorist threats or activities within the United States;

(B) coordinate and prioritize the requirements for foreign intelligence relating to terrorism within the United States of executive departments and agencies responsible for homeland security and provide these requirements and priorities to the Director of Central Intelligence and other agencies responsible collection of foreign intelligence;

(C) coordinate efforts to ensure that all executive departments and agencies that have intel-ligence collection responsibilities have sufficient technological capabilities and resources to collect intelligence and data relating to terrorist activities or possible terrorist acts within the United States, working with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, as appropriate;

(D) coordinate development of monitoring protocols and equipment for use in detecting the release of biological, chemical, and radiological hazards; and

(E) ensure that, to the extent permitted by law, all appropriate and necessary intelligence and law enforcement information relating to homeland security is disseminated to and exchanged among appropriate executive departments and agencies responsible for homeland security and, where appropriate for reasons of homeland security, promote exchange of such information with and among State and local governments and private entities.

(ii) Executive departments and agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law, make available to the Office all information relating to terrorist threats and activities within the United States.

(c) Preparedness. The Office of Homeland Security shall coordinate national efforts to prepare for and mitigate the consequences of terrorist threats or attacks within the United States. In performing this function, the Office shall work with Federal, State, and local agencies, and private entities, as appropriate, to:

(i) review and assess the adequacy of the portions of all Federal emergency response plans that pertain to terrorist threats or attacks within the United States;

(ii) coordinate domestic exercises and simulations designed to assess and practice systems that would be called upon to respond to a terrorist threat or attack within the United States and coordinate programs and activities for training Federal, State, and local employees who would be called upon to respond to such a threat or attack;

(iii) coordinate national efforts to ensure public health preparedness for a terrorist attack, including reviewing vaccination policies and reviewing the adequacy of and, if necessary, increasing vaccine and pharmaceutical stockpiles and hospital capacity;

(iv) coordinate Federal assistance to State and local authorities and nongovernmental organizations to prepare for and respond to terrorist threats or attacks within the United States;

(v) ensure that national preparedness programs and activities for terrorist threats or attacks are developed and are regularly evaluated under appropriate standards and that resources are allocated to improving and sustaining preparedness based on such evaluations; and

(vi) ensure the readiness and coordinated deployment of Federal response teams to respond to terrorist threats or attacks, working with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, when appropriate.

(d) Prevention. The Office shall coordinate efforts to prevent terrorist attacks within the United States. In performing this function, the Office shall work with Federal, State, and local agencies, and private entities, as appropriate, to:

(i) facilitate the exchange of information among such agencies relating to immigration and visa matters and shipments of cargo; and, working with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, ensure coordination among such agencies to prevent the entry of terrorists and terrorist materials and supplies into the United States and facilitate removal of such terrorists from the United States, when appropriate;

(ii) coordinate efforts to investigate terrorist threats and attacks within the United States; and

(iii) coordinate efforts to improve the security of United States borders, territorial waters, and airspace in order to prevent acts of terrorism within the United States, working with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, when appropriate.

(e) Protection. The Office shall coordinate efforts to protect the United States and its critical infrastructure from the consequences of terrorist attacks. In performing this function, the Office shall work with Federal, State, and local agencies, and private entities, as appropriate, to:

(i) strengthen measures for protecting energy production, transmission, and distribution services and critical facilities; other utilities; telecommunications; facilities that produce, use, store, or dispose of nuclear material; and other critical infrastructure services and critical facilities within the United States from terrorist attack;

(ii) coordinate efforts to protect critical public and privately owned information systems within the United States from terrorist attack;

(iii) develop criteria for reviewing whether appropriate security measures are in place at major public and privately owned facilities within the United States;

(iv) coordinate domestic efforts to ensure that special events determined by appropriate senior officials to have national significance are protected from terrorist attack;

(v) coordinate efforts to protect transportation systems within the United States, including railways, highways, shipping, ports and waterways, and airports and civilian aircraft, from terrorist attack;

(vi) coordinate efforts to protect United States livestock, agriculture, and systems for the provision of water and food for human use and consumption from terrorist attack; and

(vii) coordinate efforts to prevent unauthorized access to, development of, and unlawful importation into the United States of, chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosive, or other related materials that have the potential to be used in terrorist attacks.

(f) Response and Recovery. The Office shall coordinate efforts to respond to and promote recovery from terrorist threats or attacks within the United States. In performing this function, the Office shall work with Federal, State, and local agencies, and private entities, as appropriate, to:

(i) coordinate efforts to ensure rapid restoration of transportation systems, energy production, transmission, and distribution systems; telecommunications; other utilities; and other critical infrastructure facilities after disruption by a terrorist threat or attack;

(ii) coordinate efforts to ensure rapid restoration of public and private critical information systems after disruption by a terrorist threat or attack;

(iii) work with the National Economic Council to coordinate efforts to stabilize United States financial markets after a terrorist threat or attack and manage the immediate economic and financial consequences of the incident;

(iv) coordinate Federal plans and programs to provide medical, financial, and other assistance to victims of terrorist attacks and their families; and

(v) coordinate containment and removal of biological, chemical, radiological, explosive, or other hazardous materials in the event of a terrorist threat or attack involving such hazards and coordinate efforts to mitigate the effects of such an attack.

(g) Incident Management. The Assistant to the President for Homeland Security shall be the individual primarily respon-sible for coordinating the domestic response efforts of all departments and agencies in the event of an imminent terrorist threat and during and in the immediate aftermath of a terrorist attack within the United States and shall be the principal point of contact for and to the President with respect to coordination of such efforts. The Assistant to the President for Homeland Security shall coordinate with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, as appropriate.

(h) Continuity of Government. The Assistant to the President for Homeland Security, in coordination with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, shall review plans and preparations for ensuring the continuity of the Federal Government in the event of a terrorist attack that threatens the safety and security of the United States Government or its leadership.

(i) Public Affairs. The Office, subject to the direction of the White House Office of Communications, shall coordinate the strategy of the executive branch for communicating with the public in the event of a terrorist threat or attack within the United States. The Office also shall coordinate the develop-ment of programs for educating the public about the nature of terrorist threats and appropriate precautions and responses.

(j) Cooperation with State and Local Governments and Private Entities. The Office shall encourage and invite the participation of State and local governments and private entities, as appropriate, in carrying out the Office's functions.

(k) Review of Legal Authorities and Development of Legislative Proposals. The Office shall coordinate a periodic review and assessment of the legal authorities available to executive departments and agencies to permit them to perform the functions described in this order. When the Office determines that such legal authorities are inadequate, the Office shall develop, in consultation with executive departments and agencies, proposals for presidential action and legislative proposals for submission to the Office of Management and Budget to enhance the ability of executive departments and agencies to perform those functions. The Office shall work with State and local govern-ments in assessing the adequacy of their legal authorities to permit them to detect, prepare for, prevent, protect against, and recover from terrorist threats and attacks.

(l) Budget Review. The Assistant to the President for Homeland Security, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (the "Director") and the heads of executive departments and agencies, shall identify programs that contribute to the Administration's strategy for homeland security and, in the development of the President's annual budget submission, shall review and provide advice to the heads of departments and agencies for such programs. The Assistant to the President for Homeland Security shall provide advice to the Director on the level and use of funding in departments and agencies for homeland security-related activities and, prior to the Director's forwarding of the proposed annual budget submission to the President for transmittal to the Congress, shall certify to the Director the funding levels that the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security believes are necessary and appropriate for the homeland security-related activities of the executive branch.

Sec. 4. Administration.

(a) The Office of Homeland Security shall be directed by the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security.

(b) The Office of Administration within the Executive Office of the President shall provide the Office of Homeland Security with such personnel, funding, and administrative support, to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, as directed by the Chief of Staff to carry out the provisions of this order.

(c) Heads of executive departments and agencies are authorized, to the extent permitted by law, to detail or assign personnel of such departments and agencies to the Office of Homeland Security upon request of the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security, subject to the approval of the Chief of Staff.

Sec. 5. Establishment of Homeland Security Council.

(a) I hereby establish a Homeland Security Council (the "Council"), which shall be responsible for advising and assisting the President with respect to all aspects of homeland security. The Council shall serve as the mechanism for ensuring coordina-tion of homeland security-related activities of executive departments and agencies and effective development and implementation of homeland security policies.

(b) The Council shall have as its members the President, the Vice President, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Transportation, the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Director of Central Intelligence, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security, and such other officers of the executive branch as the President may from time to time designate. The Chief of Staff, the Chief of Staff to the Vice President, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, the Counsel to the President, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget also are invited to attend any Council meeting. The Secretary of State, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, and the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy shall be invited to attend meetings pertaining to their responsibilities. The heads of other executive departments and agencies and other senior officials shall be invited to attend Council meetings when appropriate.

(c) The Council shall meet at the President's direction. When the President is absent from a meeting of the Council, at the President's direction the Vice President may preside. The Assistant to the President for Homeland Security shall be responsible, at the President's direction, for determining the agenda, ensuring that necessary papers are prepared, and recording Council actions and Presidential decisions.

Sec. 6. Original Classification Authority. I hereby delegate the authority to classify information originally as Top Secret, in accordance with Executive Order 12958 or any successor Executive Order, to the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security.

Sec. 7. Continuing Authorities. This order does not alter the existing authorities of United States Government departments and agencies. All executive departments and agencies are directed to assist the Council and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security in carrying out the purposes of this order.

Sec. 8. General Provisions.

(a) This order does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or equity by a party against the United States, its departments, agencies or instrumentalities, its officers or employees, or any other person.

(b) References in this order to State and local governments shall be construed to include tribal governments and United States territories and other possessions.

(c) References to the "United States" shall be construed to include United States territories and possessions.

Sec. 9. Amendments to Executive Order 12656. Executive Order 12656 of November 18, 1988, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows:

(a) Section 101(a) is amended by adding at the end of the fourth sentence: ", except that the Homeland Security Council shall be responsible for administering such policy with respect to terrorist threats and attacks within the United States."

(b) Section 104(a) is amended by adding at the end: ", except that the Homeland Security Council is the principal forum for consideration of policy relating to terrorist threats and attacks within the United States."

(c) Section 104(b) is amended by inserting the words "and the Homeland Security Council" after the words "National Security Council."

(d) The first sentence of section 104(c) is amended by inserting the words "and the Homeland Security Council" after the words "National Security Council."

(e) The second sentence of section 104(c) is replaced with the following two sentences: "Pursuant to such procedures for the organization and management of the National Security Council and Homeland Security Council processes as the President may establish, the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency also shall assist in the implementation of and management of those processes as the President may establish. The Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency also shall assist in the implementation of national security emergency preparedness policy by coordinating with the other Federal departments and agencies and with State and local governments, and by providing periodic reports to the National Security Council and the Homeland Security Council on implementation of national security emergency preparedness policy."

(f) Section 201(7) is amended by inserting the words "and the Homeland Security Council" after the words "National Security Council."

(g) Section 206 is amended by inserting the words "and the Homeland Security Council" after the words "National Security Council."

(h) Section 208 is amended by inserting the words "or the Homeland Security Council" after the words "National Security Council."

GEORGE W. BUSH
THE WHITE HOUSE,
October 8, 2001.

1,675 posted on 01/23/2004 5:54:23 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1219 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Please see post 1,675.
1,676 posted on 01/23/2004 5:55:23 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1276 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait
Thursday, Jan. 8, 2003 5:43 p.m. EST Vicente Fox: 'We're Going for More' Than Bush Plan

Mexican President Vicente Fox said Thursday that while President Bush's plan to liberalize U.S. immigration law was a good start, he intends to press for further reforms that would loosen restrictions on Mexican immigration to the U.S.

"We're going for more. We're going for more," Fox told reporters while visiting a Mexican shelter for street children.

While announcing his intention to press Bush to go even further, Fox praised the president for taking "a great step forward," adding that he deserved partial credit for the breakthrough.

"It is an achievement of the measures we have been taking during these [last] three years," he told the Associated Press.

In a 2000 interview, Fox outlined his goal for fully open borders between the U.S. and Mexico within 10 years.

"I'm talking about a community of North America, an integrated agreement of Canada, the United States and Mexico in the long term, 20, 30, 40 years from now," he told PBS's Jim Lehrer "That may mean in 10 years we can open up that border when we have reduced the gap in salaries and income."

Seriously now, do you think this man would be spouting this stuff if it were not already a done deal under the table? Did Bush or the priminister of Canada rush to contradict him? There's more, such as how he and Bush discussed these goals before Bush was governor of Texas.

1,677 posted on 01/23/2004 5:57:33 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1652 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
So, failing to utterly support and vote for Republicans is the same as belonging to Al-Qaeda?

Simply put, you either don't read well or you don't understand that words have explicit meaning.

You can say we're at war if it pleases you. But most Americans simply don't think that.

Nearly two thirds of Americans, in the latest poll, say they "support the Iraq war." That's just the *Iraq* war, let alone the war on terror. You say most Americans don't believe we're at war? Who have you polled? Your buddies in your basement Green Lantern fan club?

1,678 posted on 01/23/2004 6:01:11 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1525 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
"The Dims cut the budget BEFORE Gingrich led the Senate..."

Must be a slip of the keyboard, I know you know that Newt never led the Senate, right ??

1,679 posted on 01/23/2004 6:11:19 AM PST by skip2myloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1671 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez; Nanodik
From Clinton, we learned that the word is can have a multitude of meanings.

From Bush and his supporters, we've learned that a $1 TRILLION dollar increase in the federal debt isn't really a $1 TRILLION dollar freakin' unbelievable, outrageous increase.

Oh no, it's a smaller percentage of the GDP than was spent from 1982 to 1992.

Clinton never would have dreamed that anyone that called themselves Republicans would be gullible enough to fall for that one. LOL!

Bush has also shown that many voters that call themselves Republicans will believe that a proposal to pardon all of the illegal aliens in our country and allow them to stay isn't really an amnesty.

That one probably still has Clinton speechless.

The only regret Clinton probably has, about all of the fooling around he did in the 'Oval Orifice', is it could have been him that thought this crap up, if he'd of spent that extra time thinking about how to fool the Republican voters.

ROTFLMAO!

1,680 posted on 01/23/2004 6:13:19 AM PST by 4Freedom (America is no longer the 'Land of Opportunity', it's the 'Land of Illegal Alien Opportunists'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1512 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,641-1,6601,661-1,6801,681-1,700 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson