[rdb3]

This isn't about what he wants, it's about what we want.

I can't believe I'm reading this. He's the guy you want, but he has also asked for his name not to be written-in for President.

Has common sense departed the fold? Has myopic pig-headedness invaded the spirit here?

You all have the right to do as you wish, there's no arguing that. But he isn't on the ballot (for President), does not wish to challenge the sitting President for the Oval Office, and has expressed his desire not to have his name written-in on the ballot.

Question: If you can't respect this man's wishes, why should anyone respect yours?

[Consort]

I agree. If he's not running, he can't lose. If he's written in, he will be a loser.

[Howlin]

Oh, I'd say you're safe to assume that..........LOL.

He said "We decide??" They obviously want the ISSUE more than they want a solution, don't you think?

I'm bookmarking that.

[Southack]

Tancredo says "I support George W. Bush for President in 2004."

Tancredo says "Do not write my name in on the 2004 Presidential ballot."

That's too clear, however, for those disrupters who desire only to stir up the Bush-bashing pot.

It seems that some people still haven't learned the lessons of supporting at all costs a right-winger purist like Goldwater in 1964.

Some people never learn. Fortunately, Bush will win so big in 2004 that such small numbers of non-learners won't make a difference.

They would have changed history had they been this active back in 2000, though.

[Texas_Dawg]

Question: If you can't respect this man's wishes, why should anyone respect yours?

Damn.

Ouch.

Game over.