[xrp]

OUR NATION MUST DEFEND THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE.

I find it absolutely fascinating that people on a conservative forum strongly advocate governmental interference in a personal/religious issue.

[NeoCaveman]

I find it absolutely fascinating that people on a conservative forum strongly advocate governmental interference in a personal/religious issue.

As conservatives we believe in conserving thousands of years of civilzation as is, not experimenting wildly.

[JohnnyZ]

YEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH

[Petronski]

I find it absolutely fascinating that people on a conservative forum strongly advocate governmental interference in a personal/religious issue.

Insofar as government defines marriage, it MUST do so correctly.

[Ophiucus]

I find it absolutely fascinating that people on a conservative forum strongly advocate governmental interference in a personal/religious issue

I strongly agree. That is the antithesis of conservatism.

[logician2u]

I find it absolutely fascinating that people on a conservative forum strongly advocate governmental interference in a personal/religious issue.

Not all that surprising, considering some of these folks have no problem with the gummint looking over your shoulder as you surf the Web, just to make sure you aren't seein' somethin' you oughtn't.

[Ciexyz]

OUR NATION MUST DEFEND THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE.

I find it absolutely fascinating that on a conservative forum people strongly advocate governmental interference in a personal/religious issue.

Let me explain it to you. Judicial activists are attempting to redefine our society. They are abusing the power of the bench. Some of our founding fathers feared this possibility but went along with the system of three branches of government without instilling safeguards to prevent the judicial branch from becoming a tyranny. The constitutional issue is what attracts conservatives to this issue.