Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam; little jeremiah; Cronos
BUMP.
Jives with supposition that the IndusHarappan peoples stretched far north into the mountains from the Bay of Cambay / Rann of Kutch and the Indus Delta area.
3 posted on 01/20/2004 3:34:05 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: swarthyguy
This discovery is in the Gulf Of Kutch.

Lost Civilisation From 7,500BC Discovered Off Coast Of India


5 posted on 01/20/2004 3:39:37 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: swarthyguy
I remember reading that the Harappan civilisation had extensive trade with the Sumerians -- mayhaps the Sumerians were Dravidians -- they certainly weren't Semitic. This would tie in with the extensive history of the belt from present-day Syria to the Gangetic valley. The theory of Aryan invasion is also being discounted -- there's no proof of any massacres as would be expected in an invasion site.

It would be within the realms of possibility that both Sumeria and Mohenjodaro-Harappa were formed at the same time -- c 6000 B.C. or earlier. The Harappan would have failed due to drought and the peoples moved further east and south. TheSumerian, weakened by this disappearance of a trading partner slowly succumbed to the Semitic/Amorite tribes that had been living in the valleys, outside the cities. in the Harappan context, the Aryans would have been the nomads trading with the city dwellers, so pushign Aryan origin in Eastern Iran (land of the Arya) and the Western Indian sub-continent.
23 posted on 01/20/2004 11:07:35 PM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson